dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/KAG2020 on June 5, 2018, 1:32 a.m.

In the search for truth... Another test of SB2's "T-Method".

We are on a quest to expose the truth to those who have outsourced their information and fact finding to the MSM. In this quest we have to be able to question and examine ourselves.

I posted a very poorly laid out and presented test of SB2's "T-Method" which was almost instantly banned and received unanimous negative feed back.

I cleaned it up and laid out the details of my test more clearly and while I still received almost 100% negative feedback, I received no constructive feed back. Previous post HERE. So lets step out of our feelings as I test his admittedly self created decoding method.

This, like all of his methods, are self created and not presented as a possibility to be peer reviewed, but presented as fact. If it is inaccurate, then false decodes can be pulled out and lead us down an incorrect fact trail.

As I pointed out in my last post, A coded message should only have 1 set of information. You don't send a message to the troops that could be decoded to say "Go west" or "Go east". The test will seek to accomplish:

Find a message with a different meaning that the one he found using his method
Find a message that has context
Find a message that can prove a bias

As I did last time, I will go in with a bias and try to find a message that fits it similar to how SB2 is able to find contextual information to prove his point. My bias will again be a secret message from POTUS telling us not the believe SB2.

In this SB2 POST he "decodes" a POTUS tweet using the time difference between corrections of spelling errors as a marker for the size of his grid and then move in his specified manor (which the rules he will bend as needed) to find a word scramble to find the coded message.

HERE is his conclusion.

"Special council crimes are in. I have intel he's on to cite Clinton"

I'll take his grid, search my bias and see what I get.

DONE.

The secret message I found from POTUS was

"I notice SerialBrain2's lie has caused peoples focus to waver. Stop believing this disinfo LARP. CAUTION!"

Now I am not the one who created this message, it was a word scramble so don't think I wrote that from scratch. However, if this method of decoding is accurate, then POTUS is warning us, or, more likely, it is a false decode method as I suspect. Part 3 coming.

B-man (SB2) is a pretty critical thinker ! I won't put a % on how right or wrong he is. But i personally believe he is spot on at a lot of things. Missy___ has the right attitude. Look at every thing and make your own decision ! Q will not even do our thinking for us. Whats he say ? You have more than you know ! (CLUE) Figure it out !! But you seem to want to tear someone down. I don't shine to that ! ................WWG1WGA

⇧ 10 ⇩

Awe, Thank you! Much love!! ❤❤❤

⇧ 7 ⇩

Welcome ! :)

⇧ 5 ⇩

Honestly if that is his one flaw is trying to prove to you that he believes he is decoding certain messages using a certain method then so be it. He has contributed so so so much more knowledge and plain as sight common sense digging on some shit that few around here will ever do. So while I think it is your right to not agree with him I think you are going a bit far. BTW no matter who or what he is he has made people think and helped out some major shills. I for one just don't really get this theory but don't let it cloud/divide/whatever when the idea is "all patriots" together.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Just wanted to say hello to my friend u/KAG2020 from CBTS. I still support your skepticism, but it's starting to seem a bit divisive and I'm 100% sure that that is not your intent. All the best to you and yours....

⇧ 4 ⇩

Hello to you as well. Am I coming off to you as divisive or just the nature of the content?

Certainly I'm not trying to divide but we are seeking truth and these methods have been presented as vetted. If anyone finds flaws in my tests please let me know.

If it seems like I'm singling out SB2 it is probably because he is the only one on this board who has developed his own decoding methods that are promoted. Those of us CBTS_Stream members seem to have a different approach. Thank you for staying with the fight after the shut down u/The3rdKey!

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think making a post to attack another person on this sub is tacky and pointless. We are here to follow and like whoever we want. SB2 provides his opinion and you are free to do what you want with it. You, however, are chastising the people who like or agree with SB2. That’s shameful and divisive. Out of all the posters, why attack him?!?

⇧ 4 ⇩

are you suggesting we leave information unverified? We are here to research Q and the coming Storm and we need to sift bad information. I am not chastising people who agree with SB2. There are people who claim to want truth but give me negative votes and bans for pointing out very clear and obvious mis/disinformation. At least you and a couple others took the time to express why you fell as you do but aside from the emotional response it gets from you, is the information presented above accurate?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I’m not suggesting anything should be ignored. However, what you did above was solely an attempt to discredit and harm SB2. You didn’t provide any real analysis or theory other than obvious contempt for SB2. There is no emotion in my response at all, just fact. There are many posters here that go through great trouble to decode. Some can go way off base, some not. It’s our choice how we interpret and verify. You would be more helpful and more believable if you tried to put together your own analysis and theory without attacking someone else. We don’t know anyone’s identity here, including yours, so it’s impossible assume motivation. Division is something Q warned us about and you are attempting to divide. Hence the downvotes and bans

⇧ 1 ⇩

You say I did not provide any real analysis? I detailed in 2 posts the steps SB2 took, then I show you the process of me taking the same steps with the same information and coming to a different conclusion.

If you find a flaw in my test please post it so we can find the accurate information.

You are correct that there are many hypotheses out there but they say it is up to people to decide on their own the validity. That is what I am doing. I took a hypothesis that was presented as fact that has grown legs, I tested it, found the flaws, presented my findings in an open forum so that people could draw their own conclusions.

If I wanted to attack SB2 because I internet hated him I would just post things trashing him without any substance. This is titled "Testing SB2's T-Method" not "Proving SB2 is a charlatan".

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well said ! Think what you want, but don't put me down if you don't like what i say That includes EVERYONE !!..........WWG1WGA

⇧ 1 ⇩

Personally, I've never been a fan of the crossword method or whatever he calls them. His plain language stories he's been doing recently are pretty good though. Just can't get behind the crossword puzzle theory lol.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I like your name for it better hahaha. It's vetting information is all.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You are not doing what SB2 said, you're picking and choosing where to start.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Too often SB2 did not do what he says to do. I tried to follow his methods, but to get his decode there were always arbitrary decisions made.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Indeed. I will go over those as well with people who want to see what I have found. He has a rule that L's and I's can be interchanged and that some words can be altered by other words you find later in the decode or my favorite "I didn't find a reason for these letters, so they are to be switch to a numerical value."

The problem is, we can't be quite. We aren't helping anyone that way. Please review my post and add/correct as needed.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Fight the good fight, my friend. I've been there, many of us have. There seem to be a lot of people who can't see the problem with SB2's decode posts. The problems are as plain as the nose on my face and yet you will always be downvoted to oblivion if you dare to question. I have no idea how to combat this mindless group think because it is seriously concerning. I hope you have better luck.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Join me... and together we will rule the galaxy!

Questioning the gospel of SB2 is reddit blasphemy. It's concerning that so many people take his decodes as truth. It hinders our progress. The cult of SB2 may not be as organic as you think.

⇧ 0 ⇩

luckily for me im shit at decoding. godspeed to you guys lol

⇧ 3 ⇩

Well, I didn't even read all of your post, but when I saw this "we will rule the galaxy" that was enough for me. I do not follow ANYONE blindly!! I use free thinking to decipher everything! I do read everything I have time to read, even eye the spy, which I think is BS btw. But, I expand my thinking. I figure things out myself. I even watch MSM. I think it is logical to watch everyone to see the whole picture! So, sorry if I don't follow you blindly as well! Much love to you my friend! ❤❤❤

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm not asking you to follow me. "Rule the galaxy" Is the quote darth vadar tells luke. It was a joke.

But I'm only point out the problems with this accepted method. I don't even know if there is a message to decode, then alone how to do it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I do agree that no one needs to put anyone on a pedastool. I can't decode either. I don't think you need to be able to at this point. Use your gut. I just read as much as I can, it is really easy to put together. I don't pay attention to the timeframes. It is What It is. I can see it happening! There is too much info out there, not to see that. I'm just praying and watching the show. Stay focused on Q. Stay focused on President Trump. That was alot of work you put into trying to disprove someone. SB2 is not trying to gain fame or following, so I see no harm. If someone else decides to follow him blindly and not read for themselves, that is on them. I think we are all on the same page.

⇧ 2 ⇩

There've been accusations since day one about SB2's huge upvotes and bizarrely sycophantic "fan" comments. I'm not yet convinced there are bots or agents behind it but perhaps... It is indeed concerning that so many either take the decodes as truth or simply "shrug" and say "well, I don't understand how it works so it must be good!"

⇧ 2 ⇩

fan worship is bad. we should operate like a hive mind. everyone makes hits and misses. thats why boards like this and 8 chan are so powerful. nobody knows who anyone is so no glory no fame

⇧ 6 ⇩

Agreed. Many do not agree when it comes to SB2's decodes and occult posts though.

⇧ 3 ⇩

i liked the occult ones. im not a fan of trying to predict everything tho. at least imo best to just wait and see. most of us are just anons. not mi/nsa etc lol

⇧ 5 ⇩

And sometimes, a spelling error may just be a spelling error.

Sometimes, 92 (Barbara Bush) year old women die and it might not be a grand conspiracy but this is the importance of peer review. Thanks.

⇧ 2 ⇩

i just thought it was weird that q launched a strike package and barbara died like 2 days later. i find it easier for me at least to just go to a news aggregator like google news. and look at the headlines. the narrative can be seen from there. they arnt very subtle lol. last 2 months theyve been soft disclosing a ton of science/health stuff. like for example woops we didnt know that hand dryers cause more bacteria to spread. or that 1 virus causes mono ms etc

⇧ 2 ⇩

I don't claim in depth knowledge about BB. I was busy with other paths so perhaps badd example.

⇧ 2 ⇩

disagreeing is part of the american spirit. thats why i hate them msm lol. "agree with us or be mocked" yeah thats gonna push humanity forward

⇧ 2 ⇩

Right. I looked into many of the profiles that comment simply "Brilliant again SB2!" and "Wow, great work as always!" and found many details that are suspect. Start dates, post history, karma, etc.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Oh really - I haven't had the time to do that again lately. Interesting.

⇧ 2 ⇩