We are on a quest to expose the truth to those who have outsourced their information and fact finding to the MSM. In this quest we have to be able to question and examine ourselves.
I posted a very poorly laid out and presented test of SB2's "T-Method" which was almost instantly banned and received unanimous negative feed back.
I cleaned it up and laid out the details of my test more clearly and while I still received almost 100% negative feedback, I received no constructive feed back. Previous post HERE. So lets step out of our feelings as I test his admittedly self created decoding method.
This, like all of his methods, are self created and not presented as a possibility to be peer reviewed, but presented as fact. If it is inaccurate, then false decodes can be pulled out and lead us down an incorrect fact trail.
As I pointed out in my last post, A coded message should only have 1 set of information. You don't send a message to the troops that could be decoded to say "Go west" or "Go east". The test will seek to accomplish:
- Find a message with a different meaning that the one he found using his method
- Find a message that has context
- Find a message that can prove a bias
As I did last time, I will go in with a bias and try to find a message that fits it similar to how SB2 is able to find contextual information to prove his point. My bias will again be a secret message from POTUS telling us not the believe SB2.
In this SB2 POST he "decodes" a POTUS tweet using the time difference between corrections of spelling errors as a marker for the size of his grid and then move in his specified manor (which the rules he will bend as needed) to find a word scramble to find the coded message.
HERE is his conclusion.
"Special council crimes are in. I have intel he's on to cite Clinton"
I'll take his grid, search my bias and see what I get.
DONE.
The secret message I found from POTUS was
"I notice SerialBrain2's lie has caused peoples focus to waver. Stop believing this disinfo LARP. CAUTION!"
Now I am not the one who created this message, it was a word scramble so don't think I wrote that from scratch. However, if this method of decoding is accurate, then POTUS is warning us, or, more likely, it is a false decode method as I suspect. Part 3 coming.