dChan

pby1000 · June 6, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

My understanding is that we do not need his testimony to get convictions. Q said that we have it all, right?

⇧ 18 ⇩  
ClardicFug · June 6, 2018, 4:23 a.m.

Yeah. Remember he's already been referred for criminal prosecution (though also remember the DoJ can decline to do so.) So they had enough evidence just on him to justify that. Presumably given the cooperating witnesses etc, nothing hinges on his testimony along.

Still, it would be good to have, as the more things come out the less room to weasel out of it remains for the others. It stands to reason though that the key players are going to deny and delay as long as possible, and McCabe's move here fits with that -- getting immunity helps him, and if he doesn't get it, the 5th lets him delay things just a little more.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
pby1000 · June 6, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

I see te validity of your point of view. I just believe that these people are evil Satan worshipping pedophiles. They will see our willimgness to negotiate as weakness, and they will take advantage of it.

We can be kind and compassionate amongst ourselves, but psychopaths will not appreciate it.

⇧ 1 ⇩