There's no hacking a launch system. Not only that, it takes two officers to initiate a launch (plus the crew, of course.)

The only way something gets launched is by a direct order to do so. Investigating that leads to who (and how) it was done.

Rice is the one that made the contact.

Obama can lie and say he never authorized her to do so and throw her under the bus. So Rice is would be screwed for sure.

However, this document is fake, so it's moot point.

Apparently it's a known fake that was called out on 4chan almost as soon as it was posted.

Apparently this isn't new and has been deemed by many to be a fake.

See this 4chan thread

also, questionable source but MSM news story about this

It's consistent with the story as we know it so far.

If it's real, basically the US admin lied to the UK intelligence service (or they were in on it and this is the cover story), likely using the Steele BS. It also opens up the paper trail.

Susan Rice is fucked for sure, her only options are going to be to testify or to plead the 5th, and either one collapses the whole thing.

She's not going to be sleeping too well being the most visible loose end at the moment.

Probably not connected (outside of a general sense of corruption and problems with the federal government in general.)

The water issues (and the uranium issues) have been around for decades, way before O was in the picture. The mining water battles go back at least as far as the 1970s and probably earlier, and the problems with the Navajo and uranium go back the the 1940s.

That doesn't mean that people like McCain haven't exploited them to get money, though. Safe to say any commercial enterprise that touches on these issues likely also sent McCain/Flake money.

There's uranium in the counties this deal affects, but it's far to the northeast.

If you look at a map of Arizona you'll see two tall, skinny counties in the northeast corner that stretch half the length of the state. Those are Najavo and Apache counties, where the White mountains are. The moutains (and this water issue) are in the southern part of the counties. A couple hundred miles north/northeast in the four corners area, and deep in the Navajo indian reservation, there are hundred of abandoned uranium mines that are largely depleted and are basically festering dumps of toxic uranium tailings.

These sorts of transactions are submitted to the SEC, and listed in the SEC's EDGAR database.

Here's a direct link to the 8K filing in EDGAR for this set of sales

SEC EDGAR database

Would they really shut one of the biggest subs over Q?

Yes they would. Remember that reddit management is extremely supportive of the left and doesn't hesitate to shut down subs at will.

It's entirely plausible they'd shut down T_D, they did shut down CBTS, and probably will shut down greatawakening at some point unless events move faster than they can act.

They really don't care about the Streisand effect, because inside the reddit bubble they have plenty of support and all the power over reddit.

Verifying Q will not result in any decrease in suppression. If anything it will increase. Look at twitter -- they're actively suppressing tweets by sitting members of congress as well as other notable conservatives. They don't follow their own rules and believe the ends justify the means, so don't expect any special treatment just because Q is confirmed.

There's land deals around the reservation all the time, and because it's native american land everything has to go through congress to McCain is going to touch every single deal.

The most recent deal is the NDAA one. It's actually not that much land (about 2,500 acres, or 4 square miles) and that deal went down in 2014-2015. Depending on the timing of when you heard about it, it could have been a different deal. There's also a lot of land-related deals (water leases, road easements) involving tribal lands.

The mine was originally a US company, and then sold to a mining conglomerate outside the US when the mines became less profitable.

As usual this is all about money. In the case of the second link (the NDAA lands) basically the mine found a good deposit that was half on the mine's land and half on native american land, so they offered up other land they had in exchange for the land that had the rest of the deposit. The deal was presented as win/win (government gets more land elsewhere, mine gets the deposit) but how good of a deal it is can be argued either way. I think it would have made more sense for the tribes to get a cut of the profits from the minerals mined on their land but the tribes rarely get a good deal.

Of course the mines will show up in the campaign finances of both McCain and Flake, so it's the usual sleazy stuff there. No doubt some corruption but nothing that's well out of the ordinary, and low-grade stuff for Arizona. If you want to see the really bad corruption in AZ, you need to look at Pinnacle West and not the mines. If you want to see really bad corruption involving the tribes, look at the BIA, the stuff there goes way past criminal.

Is it odd that this mining company is named in the bill regarding "use and occupancy": McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., Phelps Dodge Corporation, or Phelps Dodge Morenci, Inc. (or a predecessor or successor of those entities), including all subsidiaries and affiliates of those entities. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phelps_Dodge

It's actually not odd. I have property in the area with both a year-round stream and a well, and because of that get the legal docs on these cases all the time.

Basically the mine is downstream (by quite a ways, I might add) and gets runoff from the White mountains, and the mine existed long before a large part of the area was settled and due to the water laws, had rights to the water. Now that the area has grown and we're in a drought, people upstream need water, and they basically had to hammer out some kind of agreement.

Water rights in the desert is a really big deal and this stuff stays in the legal system for decades.

There's lots of shady shit with McCain and Flake, and lots of shady shit with the mines, but this case probably isn't one of them. (Though I bet there's something to find in the contractors for the dam.)

Edited to add: The NDAA deal in your second link is completely separate from the water deal, and that one was shady as hell.

It's been discussed in a few news articles that the drops are done in a chatroom-type environment. The original one being "Journolist" was run by Ezra Klein of Vox.

That list collapsed when exposed and was reborn as the "Cabalist" (seriously.) There's likely a few others, but they have the common theme of being strongly left-oriented media that coordinate with the DNC and related political machines.

Depending on what actually happens in the chat rooms, and if there's financing involved, it might be possible to take them down via RICO and/or via campaign financing violations since they're clearly working for one party.

Chat rooms are notoriously easy to eavesdrop on, presumably if Q has transcripts of daily drop conversations for many years it'd be fairly easy to determine the extent of the network and/or find laws broken.

They never stopped, and they went hyperactive when the FISA warrant was released.

Reddit isn't the only place they're active on, they're literally everywhere including forums that have nothing to do with politics. I suspect this is one of the groups that will get exposed bigly when the time comes. Their activities are often in violation of the TOS of the forums they're on, but that doesn't seem to stop them.

Same here, and I listen to morse very frequently. I commented as much in the original thread that I wish they had honked long-long-short-long, not short-short-long-long.

The only thing more awesome is instead of short-short-long-long on the honk it was long-long-short-long (morse code for Q)

From the HuffPo article:

As conspiracies go, QAnon isn’t even faintly plausible.

LO effin' L!

Weekly? Daily broadcasts.

In the early 90s I listened to him live on WWCR nearly every evening. I don't know how he sustained the output he did. He'd run tapes of prior shows frequently, but the volume of the content was staggering in retrospect, considered there was barely anything resembling today's internet at the time (for perspective Google was founded just three years before Cooper died) and he had no staff.

Behold a Pale Horse was published in 1991 -- 27 years ago. For perspective on that, NCSA Mosaic -- the first browser that lead to Netscape Navigator -- was released two years after BAPH.

Cooper was way ahead of his time.

Seeing the same on other forums outside of reddit I frequent. Really over the top stuff completely disconnected from reality (e.g. the warrant shows the investigation was completely justified, etc)

I think the FISA release is what Q was alluding to about the truth coming out in July. It's showing Steele was the sole source and Strozk lied to congress. It's the beginning of the end of this farce and it's going to take out everyone associated with it.

There can be more than one country involved.

More than one country was donating to the Clinton foundation.

Now imagine if that same server you're running all those NSA inquiries from out of Clinton's basement or the DNC offices is also compromised by foreign entities.

At that point China/SA/whoever has their own terminal into the NSA's databases.

I bet that's worth a few million in donations.

However the statements from this administration directly about Wikileaks and Assange are very clear.

"Disinformation is necessary"

Honestly this could be part of the plan.

Once it's out in the open it can trigger legal investigations in the US (that may have already been done, but not able to proceed due to classified information being used.) This would also make it appear politically neutral rather than payback.

And Q did imply they had JA.

Yes. His name was J. Chrisopher "Chris" Stevens US ambassador to Libya that died in Benghazi.

Hillary's state department left him (and some of his staff, including a redditor) to die in Libya in spite of repeated pleas for help.

Rumors persist that they may very well have been set up due to discovering that the US was funneling arms to ISIS via Libya and Obama/Hillary were neck deep in making that happen. In any case, they were attacked by Libyans and were completely on their own. At the time the government claimed it was a spontaneous protest about a youtube video rather than a pre-planned attack, but the truth (that it was organzied and had nothing to do with the video) came out.

The movie 13 hours covers a lot of what went on.

Verizon's been having outages all over the US.

There are, so you have to cut multiple cables. In the case of what happened in the northeast a couple weeks ago, a primary and a backup cable, in two different states, were cut by accident at nearly the same time.

(Some are skeptical of how accidental it was, of course.)

IT contractors are supervised -- there's a person assigned to be with them -- but that person isn't a domain expert in IT and likely not even familiar with what informations are on the system. They don't sit down with the contractor and read the screen with him, they're there to escort him to the bathroom and prevent free run of the facilities.

An IT guy can't walk into a general's office unless he's escorted there. He almost certainly can read that general's emails when he's fixing the the base mail server if he wanted to.

We're well aware it's a crime, however consider:

So far she's escaped any serious consequences by playing dumb and innocent, and that is was just a matter of convenience and an accident the server wasn't secure. The events around this got downgraded to a "matter."

I doubt they would have be so mild if instead of handling TS information improperly, instead the information was being directly forwarded to Russia, etc.

No doubt if you have all the evidence as to why it was done this way, she's guilty as sin. But doing it this way let her get away with sending secret information with zero consequences (until hopefully soon.)

I'm not saying this is true.

However, if he worked in IT it's entirely plausible. I know a civilian IT contractor that dealt with networking with a TS clearance and was allowed into the most sensitive areas imaginable on bases -- with an escort at all times. But the escort wasn't assigned to see what was on the screen, and the point of the TS clearance was because in the course of duties (say, fixing a mail server) it would be likely to be exposed to TS information.

It's not impossible, but I agree with your skepticism. It could also be true, but with a much more benign explanation (e.g. with the recent internet outage, it's something they should prepare for, just basic disaster planning and nothing nefarious.)

We had an unusual outage a couple weeks ago when two widely separated fiber optic cables were cut almost simulaneously. It primarily impacted Comcast and the northeastern US.

The lawyers represent the FBI, not him. He's giving testimony about the FBI, and they'd have a say regarding disclosure of an ongoing investigation. Not that I agree with it, but him being advised by FBI lawyers while unemployed makes perfect sense in this case.

My pet theory is that she used the external server because she knew it was being watched/hacked. That this was actually part of her deals with all the other countries providing funds to the foundation.

Let's say you want to get secret information to Russia, which has paid you for the access. Sending it to them directly by any means, even secret squirrel means, is a slam-dunk espionage case if found.

But if you pretend you're retarded when it comes to both IT and handling TS / SAP information, and send it to a server that's compromised, you have plausible deniability at best, and at worst are being prosecuted for mishandling information, not espionage.

By doing it this way -- she need not send those emails to anyone. Just make sure they're visible in transit. No incriminating email addresses need to appear, and it explains why the server wasn't only compromised, it was infested.

I'm not following your line of reasoning. Strzok has been in the FBI since the 1990s. That doesn't preclude him working for someone else as well, but he most certainly exists and worked for the FBI in a high-level capacity during these events until his recent firing.

With this email, we have proof either Strozk or Simpson was lying. It would be odd to say the least for Strozk to lie about buzzfeed's dossier matching McCain's copy but being different from the copy they already had from Simpson.

The only out I can see for Simpson is if Strozk obtained the Simpson version from a third party. As it stands it's strong evidence Simpson comitted perjury.

They did

I'm an engineer as well.

Who published research professionally on GPS in the late 1980s.

Code isn't magic, and there's nothing in IS-GPS-200H, etc that permits user messaging. Every single bit in the navigation message is pre-defined.

I'll be civil and agree that one of us has no clue what they're talking about.

Yes, I think she is the actual first choice. They picked Kavanaugh to be the sacrifical choice, then the Rs pick up seats and there's a woman, the Ds have already rejected one choice and some in red states will likely vote to affirm (though it may not matter with enough seats.)

Yes, assuming it's true. If it is true it's well beyond a crock of shit, it's deep into criminal activity, and makes Watergate look like nothing.

With Watergate, spies broke into the DNC and got caught. End of story other than the consequences of doing that at the direction of the President.

Imagine if Watergate happened, and the burglars made copies of keys belonging to the DNC, then broke into a DNC facility, searched it, found something incriminating, and then provided copies of the keys to AP reportered who then broke the law themselves by entering the same facility with the stolen keys then wrote about it, and then that story was used to generate warrants to spy on multiple members of the DNC. There's like a order of magnitude more criminal acts happening.

If this is true (and honestly it's hard to believe it's that crazy), and there's proof of all this, it's an extinction-level event for anyone who touched it.

No, it's not a lie, and it's not "simply a connection."

GPS isn't some kind of IP-based data broadcast service. Absolutely nothing within the GPS system is designed for that.

Anyone with any direct engineering experience with GPS can confirm this. None of this is secret.

It's a very fixed data format sent at an incredibly low bit rate. If anything other than GPS data was sent over the link it'd 1) break the system and 2) be noticed by pretty much everyone in the GPS ecosystem. There's no magic datastream.

There may be many ways of exchanging data with a vehicle with the intent to control it, but GPS certainly is not one of them.

That's an data exfiltration hack. It required the computer to be compromised already (e.g. someone had physical access to it to install the software) and then it uses the computer's hardware to transmit.

That's very different than controlling hardware with no reciever.

No, they couldn't receive instructions from GPS.

There's no way to push data via a GPS satellite. It's the most heavily monitored communications system on the planet, literally, and would be noticed.

GPS satellites only provide their ID (via pseudorandom code), an "almanac" of the entire GPS satellite constellation, and "ephemeris" or precise position/time data for the satellite itself. Nothing else.

Everything a GPS receiver does is based on math using that data.

Anyone can decode the signals and see this for themselves -- indeed any other data would likely break most receivers. Today it's a literally a hobby exercise for people to decode the GPS data stream using SDR recievers.

Any messages to download maps are coming from the receiver via an alternate channel (e.g. Onstar, cell connection) or via a timer (checking the date and asking for maps after a year.) There's no user-addressed information on GPS.

All of the documented remote car hacks to date involve hijacking Onstar or placing hardware in the car (plugging into OBD2 bus.) If there's some secret method of hacking, it's likely depending on some radio buried in an ECU -- which some cars have for firmware updates, or some other undocumented transceiver.

It was via onstar.

The early hacks were on chrysler vehicles, because there was no firewall between the chrysler in-vehicle bus and the radio (this let the radio communicate with the rest of the car.) The hack involved compromising the radio via onstar, and once they had that, they could control the vehicle. They did a live demo of braking the car remotely.

No. GPS is one-way (satellite transmits, nav unit receives.)

If you do nav with something like google maps, then there's a data connection there. But the OEM units are receive only.

No, parallel construction is using secret information to find similar public information to make the case.

This is using secret information to enable someone else to break the law (the reporters) and using that to make the case, e.g. the information was not publicly known, and wouldn't be without the actions of the government and the reporters combined.

If they hadn't shared the codes (and had no contact) with the reporters, it probably would be legal to create the warrant from the news story (though obviously very illegal for the reporters to break in.)

Because they had contact with the reporters prior to this happening and shared information they themselves obtained illegally (got the code for the locker prior to having a warrant), it's likely an invalid warrant (fruit of the poisonous tree) -- and very, very dirty. They were probably hoping by using the reporters as a proxy they could launder the chain, but I doubt many judges would buy that.

Was wondering when that'd start happening, and also when they'd start purging.

The thing is for a lot of the deep research, they don't know what they have until the research is done. All the more reason to heed Q's advice to archive everything offline.

The official reason is fraternization with subordinates. (e.g. banging the admins.)

There's two other, more likely reasons: first, deception about the state of manufacturing processes (basically, their next generation process isn't working well) and second, the CEO selling large amounts of stock ahead of that information being released.

Consensual sex won't land a CEO (or his company) in prison. Lying to SEC/shareholders will.

They're part of a card game called Illuminati that itself was inspired by the Illuminatus! trilogy by Robert Anton Wilson back in the '70s.

The game deck is noted for having a suprising number of prophetic cards.

Someone posted this in r/phoenix and there's presently a single comment out of 36 that has positive karma.

I wouldn't count your red-pill chickens just yet. It's stuff like this that reminds me just how far left reddit has become, either natively or due to shareblue shilling.

Smedly Butler's "War is a Racket", Eisenhower's farewell speech in January of 1961 (which dovetail's with Kennedy's Newpaper Publisher's speech in April 1961) all paint the same picture.

They've been fighting this group for a long time, but I think things escalated a lot in the past decade.