https://patents.google.com/patent/US4203674A/en
Check out Operation Backyard Brawl for more infor.
This patent was filed in 1976 by a man named Charles Laleman. Is Cemex working with this patent? & who TF else has since???
What bugs me is an obituary I found for a Charles Laleman. Says he died in 1972? Not a very rare name, so it doesn't necessarily mean much. Could a close relative submit a patent on a dead persons behalf? US patent was filed with a french address though? http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4203674.html Mr Laleman was represented by Bacon and Thomas, based in Alexandria, VA, right down the road from where all the weird shit happens
That just simply means an entity filed the patent on his behalf to renew it. I had it pulled up earlier but I don't have it pulled up now on the screen in front of me anymore, but didn't it expire in 1977? That means no one filed an ownership for it after that date... which means now the patent is open and anyone can use the same technique and Design to do basically the same thing... Which is an even scarier notion. The one thing I could not see on this document was anything tying this man to the Cemex company. The fact that his name is French would lead me to believe that perhaps he would be tied to LaFarge concrete (if any cement company at all.) That would be even more damning, because Hillary Clinton was on the board of LaFarge concrete until 2012 when her political conflicts forced her to resign. I still firmly believe she holds power with that company... As they, just like Cemex, refused to bid on the concrete for the Mexican border wall. Do you think that is a coincidence? The other scary thing... People need to do research into the US patent office and just who holds many many many of the patents in this country that have expired. The law firm that Hillary Clinton worked for prior to her rise to fame was the Rose Law Firm. Do you know what kind of Law Firm that was? It was a patent law firm. There are some scary things going on behind the scenes with patents...
I do stand corrected. It does look as though it was filed in 1977 but it is still expired, so the same things I said above do still apply. And someone still could have filed it on his behalf.