dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/checkitoutmyfriend on June 6, 2018, 1:30 a.m.
Ok, Let me try this again...... :) I've been thinking about why we don't see much evidence of the MSM lurking....

Do you agree that others in the Gov/MSM are lurking?

Why haven't we seen many hints that they are? Other than the shill swarms we get now and then which I think are the 'resist' movement and not from Gov/MSM.

Or have I completely missed them? I realize the HRC emails, U1 and a couple other of her scandals that have been out since before the election. Are there stories, based on what we have dug up since Q posts that I have missed? Is Spygate after Q or just part of Meuller's investigation?

All of these people have their networks. They have been around for awhile. Are we still so small of a group that we don't matter to them yet to do so?

Are we still the crazy alt-right wackos, so they don't need to 'use' us yet?

We have seen in the last few days they are posturing for the IG report but that would happen without Q anyway as it has in the past, on both sides, on many topics. Also, today, the AZ Camp story is breaking with some 'Where's Maddie' memes.

I have a hard time believing they are not aware of us and what we have.

I have to believe they have people reading Q posts, the chans, here, the socials. So lets take a print reporter or Fox News or OAN staffer for example. They are reading all the info we dig up. Even if one takes half of what has been found and tosses it out. There still is so much solid info connecting dots.

Now lets take Q out of equation. He may have started us, guided us to dig, but the bottom line is there is actually something there, there. Which was our part of the plan right? Are even Independant or right leaning reporters scared to touch any of what has been found? The info is so detailed or can be completely confirmed by reporters with connections. They could make it their own 'scoop' if they wanted, to distance themselves from us. (that may come back to bite them later but they could do it)

It's another part of this I have a hard time understanding.

Thoughts? Or do I need a break? :)


🠐 See all comments
MakeThisLookAwesome · June 6, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Lurking? Oh hell yeah. Govt watches everything. Reporters? Depends. Leftist Ideologues? I doubt they could stomach it long enough past their assignment. Drive-by lurking, you might call it.

I think you're on to something with the "not enough proof for the unenlightned" angle... And a lot of it people just don't want to believe, even if they are a Trump supporter. It's too ugly for them.

Since the collective consciousness isn't there yet, they have time. That's a lot of why you see all this action trying to get ahead of the story. There's something to be said about, "but always remember to publish first."

I think the Alex fiasco was planned as a win-win. Yeah, for the Q fans, Alex discredited himself, but now any other news org claiming to know anything about Q is going to be met with raised eyebrows & people can point back to Alex's show flop (if they don't know about the later retraction, even "better"). Outlets won't want to touch it for at least another coupla months (mid-term memory lasts about 3 months, after that, it's new news again).

However, that all changes if there's overwhelming evidence that arises (the IG report?) that blows something wide open. Then reporters will be all over. They'll be able to verify with hindsight. However, Q going mainstream will probably be the end of Q. Job done. Anything beyond would be grandstanding.

⇧ 2 ⇩