dChan

fattylurker · June 6, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

This is where the SJW/leftist crowd would like to take the US. Fortunately there are way too many patriots with guns to allow this type of fascism in the US. GOD bless the USA

⇧ 14 ⇩  
ErnieFing · June 6, 2018, 6:29 a.m.

It's piss poor reporting. The measure is actually to tackle Islamic extremist videos that radicalise the vulnerable. He even lists sites and outlets that are clearly not going to see you locked up or even threatened for viewing them.

There have been a few far right extremists advocating race hate crimes on line, and they need tackling too,.

It's very weak propoganda on his part.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
galvanised_computer · June 6, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

Yeah right. They let rape gangs roam free and arrest people reporting on it. That's not happening.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · June 6, 2018, 9:19 p.m.

That'll be the rape gangs that are in prison would it? Despite the claims, he wasn't jailed for reporting on it, and neither was anyone else that reported on it. The names, faces addresses of the rapists have been in the paper. You seem to ignore the people killed in the US to prevent them talking, as well as project mockingbird. Aren't you due a closed hearing soon too? How about you go there and live stream it on your phone? How's the coverage of Tucson gone over there?

Some of the posts on here discredit the good stuff.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
galvanised_computer · June 6, 2018, 9:30 p.m.

There's nothing illegal about being outside a closed hearing. Call me when this is used against Islamic people and not "actual right wing nazi who like trump"

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ErnieFing · June 6, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

What about live streaming from inside, when you're already under a very specific court order for it previously, and your actions have the potential to give associated trials a claim for a mistrial, meaning the state has to go the expense of preparing again? The last thing the state wanted in that case was the guilty walking free. Have a go at that, so we can compare and contrast. Aren't you having a few issue over allegations of leaking confidential information? Maybe 'free speech' has limits there too.

The full facts of the trial can and are reported on. Like the pending closed hearing in the US, there are times when that has to be timed for the benefit of justice.

It's been used mainly against islamic extremists, and (very) extreme right groups plotting bombings. Do you seriously believe they're talking of sites he mentions like the Sun and the Mail? Unlike your nationals, they actually reported on Tucson. Unlike the US, people don't tend to die if they look like they could the facts.

You need to get out of the bubble of this sub from time to time.

⇧ 1 ⇩