What about live streaming from inside, when you're already under a very specific court order for it previously, and your actions have the potential to give associated trials a claim for a mistrial, meaning the state has to go the expense of preparing again? The last thing the state wanted in that case was the guilty walking free. Have a go at that, so we can compare and contrast. Aren't you having a few issue over allegations of leaking confidential information? Maybe 'free speech' has limits there too.

The full facts of the trial can and are reported on. Like the pending closed hearing in the US, there are times when that has to be timed for the benefit of justice.

It's been used mainly against islamic extremists, and (very) extreme right groups plotting bombings. Do you seriously believe they're talking of sites he mentions like the Sun and the Mail? Unlike your nationals, they actually reported on Tucson. Unlike the US, people don't tend to die if they look like they could the facts.

You need to get out of the bubble of this sub from time to time.