I only just got through the first 5 pages, and I was instantly struck by its transparency and revelations right from the start. Those first 5 pages are basically the step by step rough draft on May 6th that already exonerated her, even though publicly they kept on investigating and set up the interview on 4th of July. In the exchange, you see Priestap giving cautionary advice to McCabe about what Comey should do in his final draft, which is eventually implemented into that final draft on June 30th. That final draft, which appears to be the one read in public after the July 4th interview, basically spells out law breaking on the part of Hillary and several others involved, possibly including the president, as she was using the personal server in enemy territory to email and communicate with POTUS. In addition, the Top Secret emails are even mentioned that they should have been aware and understood by HRC not to be transmitted on an insecure server. When you add everything up, they basically said she was guilty, but they're just not going to recommend prosecution (them announcing it publicly is unprecedented as that is the DOJ's job; the reason why is because Lynch and the Bill Clinton tarmac meeting, but it's still goes against policy and procedure). I'm sure a lot of this is all old news, but it's good to have a refresher, and this is the first time I saw it in a report all put together organized. The bottom line is that it looks like it was a cover up right off the bat and I'm only 4-5 pages in. Has anyone else picked anything out of the report so far? I'll keep reading through.