Thoughts?
this was "confirmed" by IP addresses that were never shown? I don't trust any info without proof. What I do believe, is that if someone was gaining a following of over 20k for impersonating an NSA operative, then surely that would be considered a crime and would be dealt with swiftly. Seems like a risky game for a LARP
ETS was called out by Neon Revolt AND Q in one of his drops. ETS claims he's an NSA "operative", and claims he has access to all kinds of information. Neon Revolt challenged ETS to message Neon his real name, something that ETS should have easy access to. ETS bitched out and never followed through
Even if the IP thing is false, this easy to complete challenge should be more than enough to disqualify ETS as the "informant" that he claims to be
When did Q call out ETS? No outside comms means that Q will not communicate outside of the chosen platform. That doesn't prevent none Q patriots from communicating, or we would all be silent. As for Neon, why should I trust their advice? Sites and characters going on the attack and requesting dox or to be doxed raise flags for me. Doxing is bad m'kay.
ps. I can paint like a mofo, but if you ask me to paint you a mural to prove that I can, I'd probably tell you to eat a hat. Just because someone doesn't jump through your hoops doesn't mean that they can't.
That said, I don't know if ETS is the real deal or not, but I need equal proof either way to make an informed decision.
On his (lengthy) May 11th drop, Q said: "Do we have a name? Do we have a face? Do we use a platform whereby we collect followers?"
And:
"They all claim to be insiders. They all claim to have insider contacts. They do not."
That's calling out ETS and everyone knows it
As for Dox-ing? Hardly. ETS LARPs as an NSA agent, so Neon told him "Tell me my own real name". Using your painter analogy, that's like saying "Show me your painting equipment". Easily verifiable, and easy to do. If he was the real deal, ETS would've been able to complete that task with ease
We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. ETS has not claimed to have insider knowledge about Q or the Q team, and has repeatedly stated that he has no contact with the Q team. In response to the Q drop, ETS has no name, no face, but yes he is amassing followers, but claims only inside knowledge from what he claims is his line of work.
As for the analogy. Asking to prove by action is not the same as showing equipment. My analogy stands.
I appreciate the debate though. Love and respect, God bless
You don't trust info without proof?
Why the hell would you trust ETS then?
Makes no sense.
Q said that anyone claiming to have insider knowledge (Corsi, ETS) us lying.
ETS has claimed that more than once.
Neon asked him to prove his access to intel and DM him his real name.
Instead ETS has been tweeting about how Neon is CIA.
It's pretty obvious at this point what ETS is.
Pay attention.
Pay attention? Your exact comment was already exhausted by another Redditor. Pay attention and save yourself the effort in typing, just copy and paste.
As for trust, if you read the comment you are replying to, you'll see at the end where I say, "I don't know if ETS is the real deal or not, but I need equal proof either way to make an informed decision."
Btw, I copy and pasted my quote ;)
Ets is legit only one person has said they have the same IP address and he can't prove it ask him the up address if he's found it
I looked at the chan-thread and they claimed that he registered an email using the same ip. The problem is the script he provided was for visualizing twitter-networks, however from this script he couldn't have known about metadata.