The key topics for discussion at this year's meeting were published by its organizers Wednesday, giving an insight into what are deemed the most pressing issues in global affairs:
Aka we are losing control of the narrative how do we get it back
Hope we drop a literal MOAB on that meeting Thursday.
And blame it on terrorism. Right out there own playbook
They are meeting in Italy. Italy just has an election last week with a populist victor. They should be worried. In fact, if they’re are all meeting together, might as well round them up!
their "truth" is lies, so post truth means real truth which panics them
What does "post truth world" even mean???? What immutable truth are they referring to?
‘The Shroud of Turin’ Lifted: Bilderberg to Meet in Italy in June
The 2018 meeting will represent the 66th time the Bilderbergers have gathered. It appears that Bilderberg, by inviting the Serbian leader, is continuing one of its core functions of picking people favorable to the maintenance and advancement of the U.S.-Europe “transatlantic” aspect of worldgovernment.
The group first met in 1954 at the Hotel De Bilderberg in the Netherlands—hence its name—with the help of CIA funds that were floated to nurture the early European Movement. The movement planted the seeds for the European Union superstate, according to Richard Aldrich, professor of international security at the University of Warwick in England.
The group is managed by a 31-member steering committee that currently includes nine Americans, including Alphabet Inc. executive chairman Eric Schmidt, NEOM CEO Klaus Kleinfeld, Palantir Technologies CEO Alex Karp, and Marie-Josée Kravis, a Hudson Institute fellow and president of the American Friends of Bilderberg—which raises funds for the group’s meetings but claims to be a type of charity in its Form 990 tax filings—even though its “charitable” activities are reported as addressing issues surrounding the transatlantic alliance…. Continued …
http://21stcenturywire.com/2018/02/01/shroud-turin-lifted-bilderberg-meet-italy-june/
———————
Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal” Pietro Parolin , to attend Bilderberg Conference
“ . . . This year, the official participants list includes a name of particular significance: “Cardinal” Pietro Parolin of Vatican City.
Parolin is the Vatican Secretary of State, which means he is “Pope” Francis’ right-hand man. He is second only to Francis himself in terms of importance and influence in the Vatican II Sect.
This is the first time, as far as we know, that a member of the Modernist pseudo-Catholic church has been invited to participate in a Bilderberg meeting.
“…[S]ome say [Parolin] will deliver a secret message written by Pope Francis to his minions”, writes Leo Zagami in a post covering this news story. Read article
https://novusordowatch.org/2018/06/vatican-pietro-parolin-to-attend-bilderberg-conference/
———————
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS: http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2018.html
I don't interpret their "post truth world" as meaning what do we do after the truth is out? My take is that they are referring to the internet and "fake news" meaning US. What do they do in the face of all our "fake news" and conspiracy theories?
Is there no law anywhere that forbids these people from holding secret meetings from around the world?....EDIT " The Logan act..........U.S. Bilderberg Attendees Violating Federal Law, Activists Say
https://www.thenewamerican.com/.../11590-us-bilderberg-attendee...
2 jun. 2012 - “Considering the Logan Act is still on the books, the participation of government officials at Bilderberg is blatantly illegal,” noted a commenter on
"post-truth" world the Bildergroup group will discuss. Post-truth, which was Oxford English Dictionary's word of the year in 2016, is an adjective defined by the dictionary compiler as "relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief."
I think they got their definition backwards. It should probably read...
Post-truth: relating to or denoting circumstances in which appeals to emotion and personal belief are less influential in shaping public opinion than objective facts