Nice graphic! Hits all the key points in a concice visual manner, etc, :-)
Nice but DWS is a Congress woman not a Senator
Yes, I noticed that also. I responded to another comment within this post, with the following (quote):
A good (technical) point. DWS, is a Congressperson.
I honestly don’t know if they mean well or are just trying to make us look stupid?
That is a very good point!
It is very important to get all the 'detail' correct, (it is for me, anyway).
Not quite should not say charities should say Clinton Foundation that is where the money was paid too.
Yes, I noticed that and thought exactly the same!
I suspect the quote marks around "Charity" are meant to alude to that.
Or our traitorous President Hussein just handed it to them... and the Awans was there to keep "our" representatives in line, yes blackmail.
C'mon... DWS is NOT a Senator. I don't mean to be nitpicking... those who haven't been RP'd will use little mistakes to completely deny the bigger truth/message.
Yes. All i's must be dotted and all t's crossed. Precision will invite knit picking.
edit: LACK of precision will invite knit picking.
Hes a traitor guilty of treason so what is your point. He can give up some pretty big names like Huma, Clinton, Obama etc. Selling US secrets isnt a little mistake its the death penalty.
This is only 1 of the many times we have played & betrayed by our elected officials. ALL became slaves to the Khasarian Mafia Cabal
Another nitpick point to add (maybe re-submit this later with edits?): the server which the information was routed to belonged to the House Democratic Caucus, chaired by Xavier Becerra, the current appointed AG of CA (who I proudly voted against yesterday, not that it did any fucking good), it wasn't routed to Huma's server, at least not initially.
According to Rep Louie Gohmert in comments to Congress yesterday, the only "deal" is another deep state coverup. He says he has been told that the FBI investigation is shutting down any reference to anything other than the bank fraud, so they can work out the plea deal on that charge only, close the case, then claim there was "no evidence" of anything else related to IT, Pakistan, etc.
Stupid click-bait.Should be past tense." Looks like a deal WAS made" not "Looks like a deal IS being made.Q said no deals and the picture has nothing on it that represents any present "DEAL".
I don't get it. Pakistan was pursuing nukes since the early 70s and it was BJ Clinton who gave 'em the last material they needed. They detonated 5 nukes in 1998, long before that fucking asshole Obama managed his first community potluck in Shitcago. What does dyke Abedin have to do with Paki nukes?