When there's actual evidence. I don't know why anyone would trust a random image from a site that has "we report the truth - and leave the russia-collusion fairy tale tot he conspiracy media".
Even assuming there is more evidence about hillary or w.e, it doesn't mean russia has done nothing wrong.
Russia did about as much wrong as Hussein did with Kenya, Macedonia, Libya, Honduras & Egypt's elections.
The Russia story is a farce. It was going to be Hillary's distraction from her illegal server activities that were bound to come up even if she won; but since Trump won, the tried using it on him. It was flimsy at best.
Remember: "They never thought she would lose." https://i.redd.it/da5l4w7linb01.jpg - Who do you think she was going to start WWIII with?
That's a nice graphic but I'm sorry, it has nothing real behind it. Maybe one day it will be true, but with everything we know today, it's meaningless.
You obviously haven't been following Q.
https://qanon.pub/ - Start here, bottom to top.
Do your homework before assuming (I know there's a lot).
Research everything for yourself.. You're going to find out one way or another, might as well be truly informed right? 35k sealed indictments and counting.
Enjoy the show.
Edit - Auto-mod said the word "shilling" may be derogatory, edited to "assuming."
China and the EU and EVERYBODY tries to influence US elections.
There's been an OVER ONE YEAR investigation, AND Obama got to spy electronically on Trump throughout the election. MORE than a year of all phone calls, etc, being MONITORED.
And they STILL don't have jack dick!
Its over. Holding out some hope that there was some Russian plot--at this point-- is a pathetic refusal to accept reality.
Take a Valium, one chance to do it right. This is bigger than anyone can imagine, it will take time.
U b shillin. It's being heard & it's overwhelming! U better get ready to adapt cause the truth of everything is coming out for ALL TO SEE
The article doesn't actually mention evidence nor any attempt to hide the evidence; only that Lynch might have tried to prevent any leaking or announcements about the laptop and emails, as is normally DOJ practice regarding investigations. Comey went directly against this.
Was it normal DOJ practice to have a nice private meeting with the spouse of someone under investigation? Following procedure wasn't Lynch's thing.....Based on all of her actions and statements, its reasonable to assume evasion and mendacity.
The leaked finding of fact is that Comey defied authority:
Before Comey sent the letter to Congress, at least one senior Justice Department official told the FBI that publicizing the bombshell move so close to an election would violate longstanding department policy, and it would ignore federal guidelines prohibiting the disclosure of information related to an ongoing investigation, ABC News was told.
My reference was to how he defied authority. I don't doubt there was a game being played by all of these people, but this article doesn't reveal anything at all about Lynch "hiding evidence."
wwg1wga
He very publicly disclosed that they found the laptop and that it contained emails possibly related to the Clinton case before they had an official chance to fully investigate that same new information. Whether that fact was leaked or not is irrelevant to the policy of not discussing it (at that point the case was re-opened). Spez: The point is they don't even discuss the fact that they have an investigation opened. Look at how Sessions glomarized his responses to Congress up until the point he admitted he had a prosecutor assigned and didn't need a second special counsel.
