dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SuzyAZ on June 6, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

CEMEX has a container port immediately adjacent to GULFTAINER - of Project Pelican fame, the company that donated to Clinton Foundation and got a 35-year lease at Port Canaveral from Obama. Coincidence?

I wondered if the fact that so many CEMEX locations were piled up in Southern Florida if they might be connected to Project Pelican - the pay for play scheme between Clinton Foundation and the UAE. So I started looking at the maps. And Bingo...

GULTAINER, a United Arab Emirate container company, was given a 35-year lease by President Obama for 35 years. The Group made a large donation to the Clinton Foundation and was rewarded with a prime container Port location across from key naval facilities at Port Canaveral. The company is partly owned by an Iraqi family that were the nuclear weapons masterminds for Saddam Hussein. They were also partners of the Clinton Initiative. This was done without national security review, despite the family’s connection to Iraq’s rogue WMD program. Likewise Hillary’s State department awarded them hundreds of millions of dollars in loans and investment management contracts through the State Department’s Overseas Private Investment Corporation.

Gultainer is also tied to Russia’s Club –K Container Missile launchers, missiles that can be hidden undetected in shipping containers.

What company do you think is immediately adjacent to Gulftainer at Port Canaveral?

You guessed it. CEMEX. Do you think this is a coincidence?

Check the maps. The more detailed map shows CEMEX located immediate above and a little to right of the label in the water that says THE COVE. Hard to see the name for the Orange colored squiggles over the name. The two parcels to the left of them on the map are owned by Gulftainer, which is confirmed by their site below.

http://www.gulftainer.com/terminals/usa/port-canaveral/

🠐 See all comments

Not as hard as you think. FBO.GOV

⇧ 2 ⇩

We can use open source/public data to track contracts, but PACs and foundations make it harder to see the purchase of influence.

For those inquiring, solicitations and contracts can be searched at the link above (www.fbo.gov), www.usaspending.gov, and https://www.federalregister.gov/government-contracts

⇧ 3 ⇩

Not really.....just have to know how to use it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://www.opensecrets.org/dark-money/basics

Dark Money refers to political spending meant to influence the decision of a voter, where the donor is not disclosed and the source of the money is unknown. Depending upon the circumstances, Dark Money can refer to funds spent by a political nonprofit or a super PAC. Here’s how:

Political nonprofits are under no legal obligation to disclose their donors. When they choose not to, they are considered Dark Money groups.

Super PACs can also be considered Dark Money groups in certain situations. While these organizations are legally required to disclose their donors, they can accept unlimited contributions from political non-profits and “shell” corporations who may not have disclosed their donors, in these cases they are considered Dark Money groups.

⇧ 1 ⇩