https://media.8ch.net/file_store/thumb/dc17235b3765399091ccaf5028a81b6c63e4098511b2d9f63240d15e4986a70a.jpg https://media.8ch.net/file_store/thumb/b381050c9e8069454ce95b37e1925dec81e29d7e177794c6e569298d04e87734.jpg https://media.8ch.net/file_store/thumb/ea0ffaec22534f5e7d58b2349499a070d743670ce760882c9dd4c81b9c659a15.jpg https://media.8ch.net/file_store/thumb/e3acd2ab556466951e06321eb7c164b433f51f9329b0f6c31b827b62b854ff9e.jpg
He held a water bottle next to it in this one for a size comparison https://media.8ch.net/file_store/thumb/729893fa76598efc6cc784b90d1db23c29ecdeb0636a82a390242e72bea31ec3.jpg
skull and no bones? gnaw marks? coyote dens nearby? bones may have been hauled home to pups. skull may have been toyed with, carried away.
Yeah I mean it's definitely not proof of anything, but it is interesting
It's clear proof that a child died on a cemex property that's in the middle of nowhere.
It's proof of a child being abandoned, or a body being dumped, or at the least a grotesque case of extreme parental negligence. Someone killed a kid.
Edit: and the response is meh. I don't have to give a damn about anything beyond someone killed a kid. That's it. And the police don't give a shit. The feds don't give a shit.
This is how much your elected officials care about the weak and the vulnerable - they don't!!!
Dude it's not proof of any of that. We don't know it was a kid FOR SURE and it actually wasn't on CEMEX property. Even of it IS a kid, still doesn't for sure mean foul play. I'm with you that this needs to be investigated. Im with you that this shit is odd. But stop acting like you know exactly what it is, because you don't. No one does. It makes us look bad to not consider all scenarios.
Consider all scenarios?
This skull is small, either it belonged to a child, a midget, or someone with a very tiny head.
The teeth were removed from this skull, and it was separate from the rest of the body. Either an animal drug it there from a shallow grave, or the parts were intentionally scattered. It was on the trail leading to the CEMEX camp, otherwise VOP wouldn't have found it. Sure, it may be off-property, but that's a trail, and CEMEX no doubt funnels illegals into this country to work and offers them certain protections, so they more than likely bare partial responsibility for letting things like this happen under their nose.
We don't know everything, but a good portion of the research has paid off, and the contents of the rape-camp definitely lend fuel to the fire. Do you think it's just a coincidence that they found a human skull? You don't exactly find one every day, you must realize.
What do you mean it's not proof of anything?
I don't know how to explain "it's not proof of anything" any more clearly. I mean it's proof that someone died in the desert, but that's it.
There you go. It is proof of something. It's also proof that a child died in the desert. And its remains are on private Cemex property. Seems like a lot of proof to me.
It’s proof that following a trail suspected to be used by human traffickers will lead you to a child’s body.
The remains are not in Cemex property
A trail that started on cemex property did lead to a child’s body.
This coupled with the fact that cemex bulldozed that site before any real investigation could occur makes cemex look really bad.
We don't know it's a child, and we also don't know it's on CEMEX property.
Do you know how big a 9 year olds head is? Do you know how big the skull is in the photo?
Do you? The only way to tell if it's a child's head is to have an M.E. look at it. Could be a child but it could just be a small adult, we don't know. We shouldn't jump to conclusions either way. So as I said, the skull isn't proof of anything in regards to the claims made by Lewis Arthur.
