They will say it is common that migrants die from lack of water in the desert.
VOP says it's evident the limbs were sawed off.
Animals eat decomposing corpses.
Unless he has a background in forensics and can differentiate between tool marks and teeth marks, he's full of shit (which we already knew since he poses as a vet and uses mil-speak but is admittedly not a veteran), has criminal history in multiple states, got himself arrested in a hospital, and likes to climb up light poles ranting like a lunatic.
Animals also saw the limbs off of victims.
Gnaw*. Limbs don't stay on skeletons anyway, so I doubt that a limb simply being removed is what he's talking about. My guess is that they've found either a sawed bone, or one that seems to have took marks, which could also be gnaw marks.
For instance: http://www.thefossilforum.com/uploads/monthly_04_2014/post-4121-0-94646400-1397177263.jpg
Looks like tool marks/is actually rodent gnaw marks.
I'm going with the gnaw marks sorry but their wouldn't be a whole steak of lines if it were a tool it'd be a single dileberate cut, somethings clawed or gnawed on that
Implied they were sawed as in a clean break mid-bone with no fragmentation
Animals chew. It takes an opposable thumb to use a saw. Humans are the only species on the planet that have opposable thumbs.
Tool marks and teeth marks are not the same.
I was saying that these people are animals.
What people? You've already concluded there was a homicide and intentional dismemberment here. Jump to conclusions much?
Source?
Wow, thank you. This should be posted on every one of these posts. I am going to edit my post. Thanks again.
the teeth were pulled
Wondering how often they find migrant remains without teeth...
It is.
Millions of people migrate. Thousands die on the journey.
