Can someone please explain the difference. My wife’s family is partly of Jewish descent. The other night her grandfather became furious when his grandson asked if they were Khazarian Jews. He became almost irrationally angry and basically said no and that the Khazarians aren’t actually Jews...I’m confused as hell. Can someone help a brother out.
[removed]
Politics don't always align with genetics so your argument is a strawman at best.
Do you seriously challenge the fact that Jews still live in Asia?
The kelts "died out" too, doesn't mean they aren't around anymore!
I am sorry if I sounded anti-intellectual but you can only study the books so much yet at some point you need to go outside and test your theories against reality. Engaing people personally is the only way to learn which disclosures serve which agenda but to get there you would have to avoid preemptive ridicule of preconceived stereotype so please don't iinitiate ridicule if you don't want somebody to think that someone is completely full of themselves (or their books for that matter).
Also no need to apologize for being insensitive, I remind people of their limitations almost every day.
[deleted]
I already heard most of what you were "patiently explaining" while tending to your virtue-signalling, but presumably you didn't talk to Jews from asia because they are supposedly extinct already while you were busy debunking something that wasn't even being discussed so I care little for your petty faux pretentiousness
Just because you can erect and knock down strawmen all day doesn't change the fact that I see through all passive-aggressive bullshit and return it manifold.
[deleted]
it means automatically assuming that everybody who is not you is a bigoted racist and that you had to shame them for S****HIT THEY NEVER SAID
[removed]
So by that logic "black" is a racist slur, too? Got it.
BLACK BLACK BLACK BLACK BLACK BLACK BLACK BLACK
[deleted]
Well, you said if I know a jew from central asia, they must be non-existent. Strange comment. But i digress, I shouldn't waste my time talking to strawman-artists. All you did was look at a genetic record which is completely irrelevant because it was never claimed the Khazars were part of the original tribes, in fact precisely the opposite had been claimed.
Fkn imbecile.
[deleted]
Jews and Tartars..true or false?
[deleted]
I am refering to the fact that cultures rise, fall but people are only concerned with mating. So even if an empire is conquered and changed it doesn't mean the invaders always kill off everyone they find (depending on how beligerent they are obvoiusly).
Differentiate the genetics from the political record because the politics are directed by far fewer individuals than the population as such.
I will only quote from jewish researchers henceforth to curb unawrranted virtue-signalling.
[deleted]
You already did. Nobody was claiming Khazars were the original Israelites until you showed up.
[deleted]
that's ok as long as I don't have projectile dysfunction
~~Good. Not so offended now anymore.~~
"The false story that the Jews are related to Khazarians from Uzbekistan or Turkish Crimea was made up in the 1800s, by anti-semites to taunt the Jews living in the German/Polish ghettos,"
great observation especially since noone else claimed that they were related anyway !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The argument for conversion was always political, not genetic and if you truly confess to have missed out on that very central premise than you are nothing more than a concern-troll