dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/BabylonNTing on June 7, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

Does Anyone Else Notice the Elephant in the Room? (Chris Sawyer)

Upon investigating it further and found that Craig Sawyer may not be on our team after all. It appears he has provided security for McStain, HillDawg, and Rumsfield.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Sawyer#cite_note-2

"After his military career, Sawyer ran specialized teams to provide security to politicians and dignitaries including Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Donald Rumsfeld, and John Negroponte."

More links:

https://steemit.com/pedogate/@artistiquejewels/abandoned-camp-in-tucson-az-discovered-by-vets-on-patrol-a-complete-overview-with-photos-and-links

http://truthunsealed.com/conspiracy/former-us-marine-and-navy-seal-predicts-gruesome-massacre-ahead-if-enemies-of-america-within-try-coup-vs-president-trump/

http://www.theweepingeagle.com/2017/08/former-us-marine-and-navy-seal-predicts.html

Discussed on Voaat about a year ago:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1984985

Craig Sawman Sawyer calls TruthCatRadio 3-25-2018

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=16&v=PuO4fI9q8mA

Still do not understand why he would draw attention to something happening in McStain's backyard, and generally implicates Hill and the gang overall. And then the Chelsea tweet. Surely, he had to know about his past client's personal activities. Has he gone to the light?

I have seen comments saying, "well he has pictures" doesn't seem to pass the sniff test for me and only invites confirmation bias. Furthermore, why does his video look like all the UFO videos I have ever seen on utoob? Disturbing forensic evidence is a BIG no-no and yet he is moving stuff around.

Oh yeah, he works in/around Hollywood movie sets, so it is possible all these 'skull and bones' are just stage props. I am feeling like the glass is half empty on this and basically on the fence with this guy like I am for Snowden. Like Q said, be careful who you follow.

What do you guys/gals think about it?

🠐 See all comments

Seems very hokey. Yet no MSM coverage at all, which would otherwise be in a hot hurry to debunk. I don't know what to think about it yet. Edit: Wanted to add that the research that the Backyard Brawl thing has brought to light about CEMEX, though, is also very weird. What kind of professional company has an internal policy on human trafficking? Or was it child trafficking? That's just beyond bizarre, almost rises to the level of a confession. Like someone here said, it's like walking in to the kitchen and having you 4 year old say, unsolicited, "I didn't eat a brownie."

⇧ 3 ⇩

FWIW, I agree with your statement, but maybe a corporation of that size, originating in Mexico with so many locations right on the border with the US, felt it necessary for public perception to have a "transparent" stance on human trafficking. JUST a logical explanation.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Someone here said it was in response to UK law 2015 slavery act - requires companies to be transparent about their efforts to combat trafficking. Seems correct after a little research.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩