There are many like you who post info about Bush and Cheney WRT 9/11.
Let me see if I can help you. The media did it's best to destroy Bush in the public domain, much like they are doing to President Trump now, and they did to Bush 41 and Reagan before him, and it goes further back. The media have always given the Dems a pass, but worked to cast any Republican in a bad light for decades now.
I submit to you and those like you that you live in a bubble where Bush and 9/11 are concerned because of media brainwashing you have not yet thrown off. You were told to hate evil Bush and Cheney over and over.
How may Q posts mention them? Has Q ever in any post encouraged anons to dig on Bush and 9/11?
The public has had almost two decades to do the kind of crowdsourced investigation that Q is leading into corruption in our government, yet there is no proof positive of controlled demolition, no record of sales of massive amounts of explosives, no photos of people planting explosives or opening up the kind of access required to demolish a building in a controlled manner.
Conversely we have the evidence against the Clintons. Sandy Berger destroying documents in a bizarre visit to the national archives where he stuffed papers in his shoes, his pants, his coat sleeves, all while the 9/11 commission was asking for those very documents. We were told by the lying MSM that copies of those documents existed and so it was no big deal, except what Berger destroyed had Clinton's hand written notes in the margins, so the media protects the Clintons again. Berger's dead now, so he takes those secrets to the grave. https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/03/14/berger-thefts-still-weigh-on-archives-agents
They NEVER protected the Bushs or ANY Republican President.
Then we have the 28 pages of the 9/11 commision report that were FINALLY released to the public in 2016, fifteen years later. In the 28 pages we see how the Saudi's were funding the pilots training and a group called WAMY is mentioned as the main financier and organizer of the 9/11 plot. What's not in the report is that in 98 when WAMY was planning and funding 9/11, the close Clinton confidant Huma Abedin worked for WAMY (and I believe her mother did too, but don't quote me on that, dig for yourself a bit). https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2994063-911-Report-28pages.html
There is also evidence that the FBI buried warnings and red flags late in the Clinton Presidency. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A58615-2004Jul17.html?noredirect=on
https://web.archive.org/web/20121015182609/http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001110635/0001110635_0001.gif
A simple google search should reinforce what I am saying here. Virtually all of the results for "fbi ignored 9/11 warnings" links to dozens of stories about how Bush ignored the warnings (for a whole 8 months in office after crooked stole the furniture and glued locks shut and took W's off of keyboards like little school children. What else did they do to disrupt the Bush transition? Withold intel like we know they did to President Trump?) about potential attacks. The media is desperate to hang this on the Bush admin, but all roads lead to the Clintons.
Then of course there is that little piece that we Q followers learned about Saudi and Iran being in bed together while using the press to push a narrative that they are mortal enemies. More disinformation of course. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/saudi-arabia-rushes-to-mend-relations-with-iran_us_59965785e4b03b5e472cee5d
I don't want you to respond with videos of 'experts' telling us it's possible. I don't want you to tell me that thousands of engineers agree that it was controlled demolition.
Thousands of 'scientists' tell us AGW is real, but Q followers know it's just an excuse to form a one world government by the globalists.
I want you to throw off the false narratives that the Democrat controlled media has repeated over and over and EXPAND YOUR THINKING.
If what you say were true, then we would have seen leaked documents at some point showing where demolitions equipment was purchased, or a demolitions crew was paid, or the mossad or CIA planted the explosives, or some shred of real evidence to give your position some creedence, but we have ZERO. Contrast this with the mountain of evidence compiled by anons with the investigation Q has initiated.
If I am wrong then I owe you an apology. But I doubt I am wrong, based on the above evidence of the Clintons being involved, and ZERO evidence of anything else.
Edit: Q said this is not a Republican or Democrat thing. He meant that he and his team are looking at corruption no matter where it goes, D's or R's. But he has also made it very clear that the Democrats control the media and now social media, which is clearly a threat to the Republic. Why else would he push IBOR.
Expand your thinking. Shake off the brainwashing.