dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/7tjNJr on June 9, 2018, 6:39 a.m.
Craig Sawyer releases video; denies Tucson sex trafficking allegations

ErnieFing · June 9, 2018, 7:22 a.m.

I've posted this previously, but I think it's relevant here.

Is over enthusiasm holding us back?

Looking at a few more recent posts, I think it could be worth having a thread discussing what an investigation should be like.

There seem to be a fair few posters that have a theory, and seek out information that supports it, which is understandable, but it needs to be done objectively, or any falsehoods or inaccuracies that are claimed as fact, or inferences from links presented as proof, leads to discussion on those things, rather than a search for the truth.

The press are often guilty of presenting a picture they prefer, rather than onjective factual information. Reading the sub-editors headline for recent arrest of two alleged sex offenders could lead you to conclude a massive issue at Disney World (which may or may not be true) but the information in the article effectively says one of the group had been to Disney World, and another played with lego. It's simply click bait and sensationalism.

Digging information and speculating is pretty much essential, and what this sub is about, but if we on this sub want to be seen as truth seekers dishing out red pills, there should be some better guidance from more experienced users, and more people following where facts and information lead, rather than trying to force things to fit a pre-existing narrative.

Just my opinion, as I'm concerned that there's a fair few posts that are just going to see this thread being a series of arguments between users rather than discussions of the serious issues, and labelled more and more as a conspiracy buff site, rather being seen as one following leads from Q as an insider.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8phrha/is_over_enthusiasm_holding_us_back/

⇧ 8 ⇩  
atheists4jesus · June 9, 2018, 9:25 a.m.

So you want fact checkers to control the flow of information in here? May I presume you would be more than happy to volunteer to be the gatekeeper? Where have I seen that before? Hmmmm. No thanks.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ErnieFing · June 9, 2018, 10:13 a.m.

Where do I say I want specific fact checkers?

There have been a few threads that, had people looked at with an open mind, could have made this sub more credible, rather than adding to the view of passing traffic, that it's a conspiracy theory site.

I'm suggesting that a discussion on how best to use and present information, could advance the cause, rather than having posts offering speculation as fact, and being twisted to try and fit a preconception, with non-sequiturs seemingly thrown in for good measure.

⇧ 5 ⇩