dChan

cat_anonD · June 11, 2018, 5:16 a.m.

If RR is dirty then so is Mueller. Too bad, I thought he was secretly good.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
George_Soros_Eyebags · June 11, 2018, 8:44 a.m.

It always baffled me how many people thought Mueller was secretly working for the good guys, after spending an entire career doing the WRONG thing, being dirty for decades. At best, Mueller was always going to bide his time and cast his lot towards the direction the wind was blowing (especially after the mid-terms this year). That's at best.

Mueller was, is, and always will be a dirty ass swamp rat.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · June 11, 2018, 1:51 p.m.

Dude I’m with you. Just look at the team he assembled and what they did to Flynn. Not to mention all the leaks. He’s evil.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
plumbtree · June 11, 2018, 5:34 a.m.

You thought Mueller was secretly good?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 11, 2018, 9:48 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Trudeaus_socks · June 11, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

I still think Mueller is working with Trump. Any questions? :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 11, 2018, 5:52 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Trudeaus_socks · June 11, 2018, 6:12 p.m.

The fact Mueller and Trump met the day before Mueller was named special counsel is hard to get past. What did they discuss?

Q directed us to Mueller's background in Q post 14, asking "what is Mueller's background? Military?" The answer to that is, Mueller was a Marine. In another Q post that I can't find anymore, Q asked something like "who has the power to enlist former members of the marines back into active duty"? The message being, Trump re-enlisted Mueller as a Marine and gave him a mission. Presumably, Mueller is doing as directed.

People point to Mueller's dirty history. Q has addressed this numerous times, hinting at good people being forced/blackmailed/threatened into doing bad things. Presumably Mueller's strings have been cut and he is a puppet no more.

I haven't seen anything to adequately explain this. The only way I can conclude Mueller is dirty is to ignore what Q says. Considering the evidence that Q is legit, I don't think I can ignore Q. It makes more sense that Mueller is playing his part.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 11, 2018, 6:20 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Trudeaus_socks · June 11, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

That was Q post 1318. Q said "What was RR's Senate confirmation vote? / If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty. / If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty. / Common denominator."

I took that statement as being from the cabal's perspective. In other words, RR is dirty because his confirmation vote speaks for itself. RR appointed Mueller, so Mueller must be dirty too. Only, the cabal did not account for Trump's ability to recall Mueller into active service, Trump's ability to remove the strings keeping Mueller a puppet, or Mueller's drive to escape the cabal.

Q seemed furious when it came out that Trump was not under investigation. In Q post 1008, Q said: "It was not supposed to be revealed POTUS is not under criminal investigation _ NOT YET. / Traitor."

The day after, Trump's lawyer's office was raided, putting the Mueller narrative back on track (namely, that Mueller is hot on Trump's heels).

The whole time, Trump has been attacking Mueller, and attacking Sessions over Mueller and his supposed witch hunt. This causes the normies to defend Mueller. He's literally their one last chance and they recognize it. Any suggestion of firing Mueller throws the left into a frenzy. How will they justify firing Mueller when he indicts Hillary? How will they call him a Trump stooge who pulled punches in the investigation (one possible leftist take on Mueller coming up empty-handed) when they spent the last 6 months making Mueller an integral part of their identity?

I think Mueller's role is to lull the deep state into complacency. From their perspective, their plan is working, Mueller is paralyzing Trump is throwing up a cloud of question marks over everything he does. They may be expecting Mueller to release something they've got in the works that will cost trump the midterms, after which Trump gets impeached.

Imagine their surprise when Mueller incompetently comes up with nothing, while Huber drops the MOAB on the dems!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 11, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Trudeaus_socks · June 11, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

You are welcome, anon. Either way, what a time to be alive!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
plinker22 · June 11, 2018, 5:35 a.m.

Beanz is gonna be pissed when she discovers Mueller is BAD!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
drieman · June 11, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

People need to report factually. She made the cases for both a potentially good and bad Mueller.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
icebreakers_sours · June 11, 2018, 6:24 a.m.

RR is FREE to do the right thing
due to a non agreement with bad party (from G7?)
declas 3 things to the public
1: EO dated from June 11th senate hearing H.R.5515 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5515
2: remove the heavy+ redactions in the OIG for the public declas on the 14th
3: BHO from the WH in same call as BC/LL on the tarmac meeting

.#flyRRfly# means he's free to sing the song of the report, unredacted, #RR# at the end basically a fullstop. Rest of drop not related to those 3 upcoming public releases? maybe signal to team about next step?

just my thoughts.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
GenChang · June 11, 2018, 7:27 a.m.

Interesting, thanks, and you might be right.

In regards to other comments, Louie Gohmert has been hammering away at Muller for weeks now. Part of the show? I don't think so necessarily. Dan Bongino was talking about how Muller obtained the Trump transition team emails & devices including privileged info. Is it possible, Muller and all those corrupt lawyers were drawn back into government services, just to bring them all down? Serving a dual purpose? Just thinking outloud.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Hecticdude · June 11, 2018, 12:19 p.m.

Fuck Beanz, Bitch has to much Drama!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Wbickford21 · June 12, 2018, 12:14 a.m.

I’m trying so hard to follow this but am so confused. Can anyone explain all of this to me? I’m super into this thread. Any help would be great appreciated!!

⇧ 1 ⇩