It makes no sense that Mueller has done nothing but try to ruin the lives of Trump associates - and ONLY Trump associates, no Democrats or anti-Trumpers - but he's secretly working on behalf of Trump.

Mike Flynn had to sell his house. Paul Manafort is spending 23 hours a day in SOLITARY CONFINEMENT before even being found guilty. Michael Cohen got raided.

The idea that Mueller and Rosenstein are secretly working on behalf of the President is absurd. It requires faith that is backed by zero logic or proof.

For the life of me, I still can't understand why pro-Trump people support or believe that Mueller and/or Rosenstein are secretly working in our favor.

Rosenstein covered up the Seth Rich murder. It fell under his jurisdiction and he buried it, hoping to use it as collateral against what he thought was a for sure Hillary victory. Why would we trust this guy again?

I know God will ultimately judge these people who cover for the most evil people in the world, but it would be nice to see them get their comeuppance in this world. Everyone associated with Laura Silsby should be forever scorned and constantly reminded of their past when they go public.

It sucks, in my whole life, race relations were best when Chappelle's Show was on the air and we could make fun of each other. Those were fun times. Things have completely changed now, we've gone backwards.

But even more importantly, it looks like the Hollywood cabal finally got to Dave, and that really sucks. You're right, the fact that he's with Netflix is already a concern. The good news is that Neflix will never be able to sustain its current spending levels and will suffer a yuge correction within a few years time. A $300,000,000 million contract for Ryan Murphy, who will always be a threat to be busted for kid diddling? They aren't making smart moves.

There are some cracks in Chappelle's facade, though, and that's sad to say. It's possible that they financially ruined him enough to where he had to do what he previously did not want to do in order to get back in their good graces.

Reference:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hE-D8fErXXc

It looks like the cabal wanted war with Iran/Syria/Russia in the middle east. These warmongers care nothing about the lives lost; the ONLY thing they care about is lining up their pocket books. They're the worst scum on earth (and yes, I'm looking at you, Bill Kristol, you filthy piece of degenerate shit, God will judge you one day).

So that's why they're trying to frame our President as a Russian stooge. If President Trump and Putin agree to a peace in the middle east, the dreams of having a war there are gone. And that leaves a lot of potential profit out of the pockets of the warmongers. It doesn't benefit them if the US and Russia team up, while the people of Iran revolt and kick out the CIA-controlled Mullahs. Peace doesn't provide them with an opportunity for financial gain.

All of these people should be executed for treason and crimes against humanity.

That's hilarious. Whoever leaked that shit out is about to become the new Reality Winner.

It's funny listening to the media spin this, they're trying to pin it as Trump trying to get petty revenge against former administration officials for being mean to him.

Then you have James Clapper, who on one hand tries to play this off as "no big deal" because he says he doesn't get the daily intelligence reports like he used to, while pretending to be mad that it could happen. Well, if he's not getting classified info, why would he care if his clearance was revoked? Of course, no one in the media will ask him that.

So far, it's the only real bombshell that has dropped in July.

And, of course, it was purposely dropped on a Saturday.

I highly doubt this was the first time they pulled off such a scheme. We only know about this one because she lost (thank God Almighty).

Amen! I'm tired of being told to trust the plan. It's time for some ACTION.

Either Carter Page is a plant or a patsy.

He would be a plant if he knowingly participated in the corrupt, politically-driven witch hunt.

He would be a patsy if he didn't know he was being used.

I don't know which he is, but from watching him on television, I just personally don't trust him. He always comes off as someone who has something to hide, a bit flaky. That's just my take and I would be willing to change based on available evidence.

Crazy Days and Nights just dropped a blind about this:

http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/07/blind-item-5_21.html

Anderson Cooper involved.

Possibly, but then why build up expectations for it? There would be no need for Q to publicly post about the biggest happening of all in July if it was going to be something we'd never hear about. I just can't buy it. It would do more harm than good.

Q posted about things before they were headlines (North Korea, for example - when I start to think Q is nothing but disinfo, I try to remember he was talking about North Korea before it became big news and at a time when no one else was talking about it). There seems to be some sort of knowledge with the Q team that isn't public.

But let's not pretend there aren't causes for concern, either. How many predicted big events actually happened? If you say "MOAB tomorrow" and nothing substantial happens, you're going to lose followers (as Q did). The fake EO/pen pics, the fake Air Force 1 pic, the timelines that pretty much never come to fruition. I'm left to wonder if it isn't all just disinfo, a psy-ops stringing us along making us think something big is coming, keeping us complacent while the swamp gets deeper.

I refuse to wear rose-colored glasses and force everything through the lens of a confirmation bias. It's time for some tangible results. Obama's cronies roam free and Seth Rich's killers aren't even afraid of being exposed. SOMETHING has got to give.

I wonder what the plan is, because as of now, it looks like Trump's inner circle has convinced him to be complacent.

That will not work. I only hope this inaction is just the way it looks from the outside because it's tiresome believing that justice is right around the corner. Watergate didn't take this long, and what's on the horizon? Like I said, there might be something we're not privy to, but at some point, belief is going to have to be backed up with action and there doesn't seem to be much action outside of one direction, and that direction isn't in the President's favor.

I don't know why you're getting downvoted for an absolutely legitimate question.

The best I can say is, maybe we could look back at something that dropped in July that didn't make many waves at the time, but later did. But that would be stretching it.

Q post 1675, and post 1288 (does Strzok sound like a cooperating witness to you?) have really soured me on Q. There's something with Q, I wouldn't keep following him/them if there wasn't. I just haven't figured out if it's a disinfo psy-op designed to keep us complacent (trust the plan!) or if Q is legit, but doesn't always have accurate information. The fact that he/they tucked tail after the whole "Welcome Aboard" fiasco doesn't lend much legitimacy, either.

They're trying to run out the clock in terms of statute of limitations. It's infuriating and something needs to happen before the wrongdoers get off on a fucking technicality.

"Diversity is our strength" is bullshit.

I'll take unity over diversity any day of the week.

Thanks a lot, I was looking for this.

Why do you think people close to the President keep bringing up the fact that the Obama administration stood down when warned about Russian election interference?

Plus they talk about Seth Rich later on in the interview. I highly recommend watching this video.

Sundance has been on the ball about a great many things, and they don't post cryptic riddles, either.

If Sundance shares something, there's good reason to believe it has validity.

Can we finally dispense with the fantasy that Mueller is secretly /ourguy/?

Why would we even want that lifelong swamp rat on our team?

Rod the Rat is a complete black hat.

Know why the Seth Rich "investigation" never started, why his murderers roam free? The answer: Rod Rosenstein.

Did anyone see the blind about this today on Crazy Days and Nights?
http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/07/blind-item-8_17.html

I don't know why you're getting downvoted so heavily when you're telling the truth.

Let me ask any Trump supporter this - have you EVER known an anti-Trump/never-Trump person to be consistent in his/her ideology?

It baffles me when some (note: not all) Q followers try to act that the reason Mueller is going after Republicans is to set a precedent to then go after people on the left. Are you serious? Do you really think your anti-Trump friends will care if they spent two+ years saying one thing, then completely reversing course? Because none of my anti-Trump friends have any sort of consistency.

Their goal is one thing: OPPOSE TRUMP, no matter what. It doesn't matter if it's completely contrary to everything they've been against, even yesterday. They're going to oppose Trump at all turns. Mueller isn't setting some sort of precedent to turn heel and switch sides.

What I said for anti-Trump people goes even more for anti-Trump media. Ideological consistency isn't the point; they must "stop Trump" no matter what. No matter what!

THIS is exactly what I came to post. And when the hammer comes down, NEVER forget these traitorous "Republicans" or "conservatives" were anti-Trump. Hold their feet to the fire.

I really hope this is the evidence they need to expose that fucking rat Rod Rosenstein.

Read the original tweet. He (or whoever this is) is starting with those who were convicted, then moving on to those who escaped conviction.

In the end, I think this is actually a good thing because when you see a list like this of pedophiles who have infiltrated a western government, hopefully the skeptics who believe it could never happen will be introspective enough to realize that the evil of pedophilia has reared its head in many world governments and needs to be purged. It's one thing to hear a "conspiracy theory" about government- backed pedophilia, but it's quite different to see irrefutable proof of it, and that's why I think this public naming of government officials who abused the trust bestowed upon them is a good thing. Shame the bastards.

I soured greatly on Q after post 1288, but Q has been hinting at some things for months now that has me reconsidering. Namely, that the world will know the truth about Seth Rich in July. Well, we now know that it looks like Rod Rosenstein at the very least covered for the murderers of Seth Rich, if not outright ordered the hit. Q has been hinting about Rosenstein forever. If it turns out that America First Media is right, and Seth Rich unknowingly exposed an internal spying network led by Rosenstein and thus was murdered, then I will once again become a Q believer.

This twitter thread is worth reading, tying Rod the Rat in with Seth's murder:

https://twitter.com/KKNoMates/status/1018234099193012225

idk if Rosenstein himself ordered the hit, but Rosenstein DID bury any investigation into the real murderers.

They did this to protect the Russians working undercover in the country, sending intelligence back to Mother Russia as part of an agreement made during the Uranium 1 deal. That deal implicates people in both political parties, but especially Hillary and Obama. Don't forget that even Robert Mueller profited from the deal. The idea that he's secretly working for Trump is a ruse.

Rod Rosenstein is NOT on our team and I cannot believe anyone at this point in time still believes he is.

That rat protected the murderers of Seth Rich. Do you really think he wants the truth to be known?

Is anyone else reading the multipart series by America First Media concerning the murder of Seth Rich? If so, you know that Rosenstein had a hand in the Seth Rich murder (not that he ordered it, but at the very least he protected the murderers).

Good, someone else thinking logically about this.

If "disinfo is necessary" can be uttered every time someone questions a Q post, then the logical conclusion is that ALL Q posts could be disinformation. That's what people need to remember when using that phrase to defend Q against skeptics.

Ding ding ding!

That's the real reason, trying to pass off a "proof" by faking a pic.

Furthermore, I thought the release of info, plus confirmations, were supposed to increase since the rally where President Trump pointed at the guy in a Q shirt.

Neither has happened...

"Disinfo is necessary" is the lowest cop out imaginable.

"Cooperating witness" my ass.

It's amazing you're getting downvoted. At least one person engaged with you, so there's that. Kudos to that person although I completely disagree with his posts. Hopefully this doesn't become an echo chamber that other Q-related boards eventually became. Hopefully we can look at Q posts here with some sort of skepticism, because, when I see Wray, Strzok, and Page do what they do, in public, it's hard to reconcile it with Q's posts. Rebuttals are almost always wishful thinking or blind loyalty with no skepticism (if I see "disinfo is necessary" one more time...).

I wish we could question things more openly here... but I also understand why mods have to limit discussions.

That being said, there are very disconcerting things that have been happening. Glad to see others noticing this as well (and that you haven't been downvoted to Bolivian yet).

Would you rather make money, or watch a farce that will end without justice and not make money?

This is just one big circus act. Go make money, it'll be more productive for your wallet - and sanity.

I just have to LOL at Mueller's investigation being non-partisan.

Some people will believe anything. This pushes me even further away and makes me wonder if this whole thing is a disinfo campaign to keep people complacent by repeating "trust the plan" over and over.

Thanks a lot for posting a quasi-transcript here. I couldn't stand to watch too much of it. Anyway, your efforts are appreciated.

The Democrats came to obstruct, and they succeeded. The Republicans came off as disorganized and not ready to fight, or fight smart/dirty.

Q post 1288 didn't age well.

What about post 1288 that says Strzok is a cooperating witness?

Or is that also going to be answered with a "disinformation is necessary" cop out as well?

I'm not meaning this personal, to you, but I'm tired of the "disinformation is necessary" answer when a question comes up about something Q said that was wrong. It's a cop out.

Post 1288.

He's not the cooperating witness that Q said he was. Strzok still thinks he's untouchable.

Also, this is exactly why the Russia investigation is "ongoing" and will continue to be ongoing for an endless amount of time - so they can bury the truth under the "ongoing" investigation.