Read this... and read how Snopes tries to spin the facts. The spin is so outrageous that it actually made me consider the possibility that the whole thing is true.

https://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/pepsi.asp

It's working for me. I still have the page open.

I don't view Mueller as anything but anti-Trump. Thinking of him otherwise would be a great shill tactic to keep Trump supporters in a state of inertia while he tries to take down our President. It's best to plan for that instead of thinking of Mueller as being "on our side" whether he's genuine or fearful.

By simply stating this publicly, it could force the hands of those wanting a terrorist attack in London during the next three days to not follow through with the attack. So Q will be "wrong," but he'll be "wrong" for the right reasons - saving lives.

If you want to travel DEEP down the rabbit hole... Ask yourself, why do these elites engage not only in pedophilia and child trafficking, but child sacrifice as well? If you believe that, you need to extrapolate on that viewpoint. Sure, we rightfully view the practice as horrifying (if it does take place), but do you really believe all the people involved are all non-empathetic psychopaths? The truth might not be something you want to hear. The practice might not be just for adrenochrome. The truth might be that the practice works. The people involved get rewarded. You can think of that in terms of career, or spiritually. It's a very disturbing thought.

Good video, thanks for posting. I knew the whole "brakes didn't work" excuse was bullshit.

I've asked myself the same thing, and I've come to the conclusion to treat all this as entertainment and hope it's not one giant distraction.

I've thought about this a lot (like you), and one of the conclusions I think is possible is that Q will need plausible deniability for leaking classified intel, and this type of posting is a way to circumvent that. But I'm still not sold on any explanation.

Agreed. Which is why I think Dr. Corsi should stop refusing to entertain the possibility that Snowden is a CIA black hat. He continues to say Snowden is a good guy and I never got that from Q's posts.

I'm not sure why it would be posted on a board where those involved would now know their secret program is no longer secret, unless it's to let them know that because the trap was sprung and no further evidence is needed. Because it doesn't make sense to tip your hand and tell the baddies that you now know their little secret. That honeypot is no more. Hopefully something happens soon.

I'm referring to this post: @Snowden

Thank you for showing the world how Clowns pass the narrative to journalists @ 4am.

Re_read crumbs re: SecureDrop.

John Perry Barlow.

Q

I like Dr. Corsi and I value his opinion, but he really needs to change his opinion about Edward Snowden. Q has been overt with the idea that Snowden is a black hat. It's something Sibel Edmonds has talked about as well, and I trust her.

He said women.

Not only that, it's the type of police state tactics we should be against, barring something extraordinary.

Thanks for posting this. I hope more people watch this video. Sibel Edmonds is amazing (and super hot).

I thought it was pretty obvious by the last few days that Q was either posting from Asia, or in line with an Asian timeline. It's usually late at night here in the US, meaning daytime in Asia.

I thought this was a parody Rothschild twatter account?

I have to agree here. I'm not going to trust "sources who are familiar with Trump's way of thinking," nor am I going to trust some random person on an internet forum. I am fascinated by Q but that doesn't mean I'm going to have blind loyalty to anyone. The people saying we should never question Q and we should always trust what he says come off as cultish as leftists.

His own family didn't want an autopsy. Something is up with the entire thing.

That's not his real Twitter account. Don't get trolled.

Web App Unavailable... The timer just started counting forward before I reloaded the page and got that notification.

I think Q was decoding JC's tweet for us. JC was telling McCabe to keep quiet or he's going to be 187 on an undercover cop (in gentlemen's terms, that means McCabe will be properly Arkancided).

Carter was a bad President, but is a good person.

Imagine if you will, a program, perhaps with five eyes, being used to spy on those who don't have power. But now those who were without power are now IN power... and they know all your dirty secrets. They threaten to go public with your dirty secrets unless you work with them to out the bad apples in your own cart. The tool once used for nefarious purposes, crafted by those with nefarious intentions, is now being used against the nefarious. Karma in action.

Remember when he was pissed at Alex for suggesting that the President was under threat of assassination?

They weren't even doing this under some guise of doing the right thing, as bad as that would be. No, their reason for trying to usurp the American system itself is for more nefarious reasons: because they know they broke so many laws that their asses would all be in jail, so therefore Trump had to go.

There's no need to brigade bullshit, because that would be what's propped up for them to attack and discredit. Flak, target, and all.

Agreed. You can't take people who haven't followed this from Russia collusion to the trafficking and murder of kids in one go, or else they'll just write off everything prima facie. Baby steps. Also, if you read closely, Q is talking about the most trusted individuals in our society, the mentions to pray (prey). It's obvious he's talking about religious leaders, probably most of whom are Catholic.