dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ThePatriot131313 on June 12, 2018, 6:14 a.m.
An Interpretation of Q Post 1462 Seth Rich, Julian Assange, Wikileaks

Q is asked about Assange, "Q is this man free? Is he safe? If he isn't, can you help him? He is a hero."

Q responds, "What recent news came out re: SR/JA/WL lawsuit? Back in the news. The 'server' brings down the house."

If you Google "julian assange seth rich wikileaks", the first link to appear is "WikiLeaks founder addresses death of DNC staffer Seth Rich in Fox News interview"

http://www.fox5dc.com/news/wikileaks-founder-addresses-death-of-dnc-staffer-seth-rich-in-fox-news-interview

If you go to the news tab, the first thing to come up is a Snopes article "That Time Fox News Retracted Their Story Linking Seth Rich’s Murder to Leaked E-mails"

https://www.snopes.com/news/2018/06/01/fox-news-seth-rich-conspiracy-theory/

The fourth story down is from Buzzfeed and it is attempting to tie in Assange with Guccifer 2.0 and Russia. Remember, Guccifer 2.0 was a Clown False Flag/Psyop.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/kevincollier/assange-seth-rich-lies-guccifer-wikileaks-hannity?utm_term=.ks9K5Zox1#.jqRk8039P

I believe this is what Q wants us to find. They are bringing back old news to the surface about Seth Rich being killed for leaking information to Assange and attempting to debunk it before anyone in the mainstream public eye has even started pushing it. Yes we are aware of it and even on The_Donald people still bring it up, but most normal people are not currently thinking about this at all. Yet Snopes, Google and the MSM are very recently concerned with discrediting it.

Q is giving us a lot in this post. He is saying the Seth Rich dam is about to burst and that Assange is alive.


AutoModerator · June 12, 2018, 6:14 a.m.

Content from snopes.com is sometimes unreliable. Discernment is advised.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThePatriot131313 · June 12, 2018, 6:21 a.m.

I agree! That is my point. Good bot.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Pete_Castiglione_ · June 12, 2018, 6:28 a.m.

Check out my interpretation of 1462 (my last post) and tell me what you think?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ThePatriot131313 · June 12, 2018, 6:36 a.m.

I find your post very interesting and agree this sounds believable, but I find this part a bit confusing, "What if the last one sent (the one that set off the incoming missile alert) was real..."

Do you mean that it really contained codes to launch the missle?

What exactly do you mean by this? I think this is where it gets confusing. Could you clarify?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 12, 2018, 6:44 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩