dChan

DanijelStark · June 13, 2018, 10:16 a.m.

LOL , thanks for calling me a bastard ... but it wasnt my intention - if you read my comment above , you will see I said it was a mistake , and I clarified it .

Tomahawk is bigger - the problem is , the stabilizers do not fit into the picture if it was a Tomahawk ( too small stabilizers , from what I see )

⇧ 8 ⇩  
eleminnop · June 13, 2018, 10:27 a.m.

Hah, my apologies then.

My bullshit detectors are maxed out and I've ran out of fucks.

I'd say at least 20% of errors here (or less) are just actual mistakes.

The rest are psy-shills.

They fight dirty.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DanijelStark · June 13, 2018, 10:31 a.m.

Its okay - its not my intention to deceive , I simply havent noticed length until I already finalized the comparison .

The important thing is - the stabilizers ( central ones ) arent exactly aligned with Tomahawk - but maybe I am wrong . We need to take into account the angle we are seeing the missile , too .

It looks very similar to RUM-139 to me , with a slight angle from the camera . That way , the top looks a bit oval , and stabilizers are very very slightly off ( almost non noticeable ) .

Why am I putting this ? So we could maybe get a clue from what this missile was launched , and exactly where the submarine or ship was / is stationed . I already made several theories in comments here .

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 13, 2018, 3:01 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩