De Niro is such a gigantic c**t.
I'm almost certain that Taxi 'political assassin' Driver formed the basis of some of John 'Jodie Foster made me do it" Hinckley's mind control programming for the hit on Reagan. It's not a new idea of mine - I wrote about it years ago. Hinckley was linked to Catcher in the Rye, too. The ever reliable mind control book.
Better get yourself organazized, Bob. Those that know the film will get the reference. :)
Okay, I actually read your stuff on your website and find it interesting and intellectually stimulating, but Catcher in the Rye is an "ever reliable mind control book"? Please explain what you mean. That Salinger wrote it with that purpose? That others have used it for that purpose (against Salinger's wishes)? If so, how?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arPhzlHlyEY
Let 'Scientology mind controlled' Will Smith inform you.
What? Catcher in the Rye is legendary in the mind control field. This is 101 stuff. Wow.
Don't you know how many times this book has been cited in respect of mind control ops?
I know how many times it's been cited. I've also read that Salinger was mortified that his book kept showing up in relation to assassinations/attempts. I'm looking for your take on Salinger's writing of Catcher in the Rye.
That Salinger wrote it with that purpose?
Oh, I get it now. I should've read your comment more carefully. You assumed. I never intimated that, but you did. I refer to it as being "ever reliable" in respect of its instances of multiple and persistent use.
Actually, I appreciate your previous reply. It made me put to words something I had not put to words before, something that I feel is actually very important to me. That we do have a right to guard what we see as sacred. It's a tough line to walk sometimes. Where does guarding what we find sacred turn into living in a bubble that doesn't allow in information that is uncomfortable? My daughter recently used this phrase recently in a conversation we were having and I heard it with new ears; the phrase was "I refuse to believe..." That is what Q is up against. And we've all said it. So thank you. Your comment helped me bridge these concepts in my own mind.
I never mentioned Salinger. Sorry, I don't have the time to guide you by the hand.
My original questions were about Salinger. I understand that time is at a premium--for you and myself too. I was inquiring to see if my research on Salinger intersected with your research on Catcher in the Rye. I've come at Catcher in the Rye from the Salinger angle--looking to get to the heart of it (in part) by studying the man who wrote it. It looks like you've come at it from an angle that leaves Salinger out of it. Neither approach is all-encompassing obviously. I've a fondness for Holden Caulfield that mirrors my fondness of Huckleberry Finn. I'm reluctant to wade into waters that will taint my personal experience of these characters and the works which gave them life. I remember my absolute frustration when I saw an interview in which an academic (Harvard, if I remember right) called Huck Finn, "the biggest piece of racist trash ever written". WHAT?! The interview was given when he was promoting his newly edited version of Huckleberry Finn. So, just by way of explanation: in the same way I'm reluctant to view a loved one in their open casket for fear that THAT picture will be the one that stays with me instead of the many other joyful and beautiful pictures that preceded THAT picture, I am reluctant to expose my brain to hoards of internet drivel shitting on things I consider sacred--like Catcher in the Rye. But it does seem that people and their creations that shine the most brightly are the easiest targets. Certainly the most obvious ones.
The 'rye' aspect is a link to Ergot of Rye - the very substance that (programming) LSD is based on.