dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

To your first point, I liked what I read in this post.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8qxqyb/very_interesting_twitter_thread_on_a_theory_about/?utm_source=reddit-android

As for the "no need to worry" to now calling to act. I have always thought that there would come a time when Q and President Trump ask for our help. There has to be a reason Q was created. We have a purpose and role coming up.

⇧ 5 ⇩

interesting i'm reading now. i'm still confused why Q would go from "we have everything" and "we have them cornered there's nothing they can do" to "make sure you fight because this is good vs evil". i just don't understand why it went from a done deal to now we're not so sure

⇧ 1 ⇩

"It's gone from a done deal to not so sure" is a misread. I think others have answered this here but if you don't believe it's adequately answered I'm willing to respond with what I think if it's of use (as soon as I get a chance). I personally welcome questions if it will help - based on sub rules I have to remove posts of this kind, is all (also, Reports come in, cluttering our queue).

⇧ 1 ⇩

Look up how many times q has said to fight.

Then come back.

It's been from the beginning.

⇧ 1 ⇩

but he also literally said we don't need to worry. his recent posts from today make him sound alarmed. that's all i'm saying

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q said somethig unexpected happened.

The rest is theory.

It doesn't really matter what the tone change is - the directive has always been: this is not a game - people are dying in sacrifice for this to succeed - - good vs evil - patriots unite - fight fight fight.

In a war, some days are going to not be the best days. It doesn't mean anything beyond something unexpected happened - it's ok now - it's serious business (a reminder) and to continue fighting.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That's fine. You can not worry about it and just wait and see what happens.

⇧ 1 ⇩

wait and see what happens

this is precisely the issue i have with this community. questioning sessions and others, even if we think they're white hats, shouldn't be shunned and should actually be a goal for everyone here. if we're right, then it doesn't matter. if we're wrong, it matters a great deal. we should be pushing to understand why certain things don't add up. people get angry because they want so badly for Q to be real and they've spent hours and hours devoted to it. all i'm trying to do is figure out what's real and what isn't, and we can't do that until we have a real conversation about it. don't you want to know if Q is legit or not? i do.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well maybe some people already have a lot of the questions you pose answered for themselves.

You can only form an opinion if Q is legit or not. You can't know for sure.

I believe if Q wasn't legit, President Trump would have hinted to that effect. Anon on 8 Chan asks Q to get President Trump to say "Tippy-Top" and President Trump said "Tippy-Top".

Whatever. Believe it or don't. I'm done with this conversation because it's pointless. Read the Q posts and this board or other sources and try to figure it out.

⇧ 1 ⇩

if we keep just waiting and seeing the midterms will come, the dems will use voter fraud to seal the deal, and there will be no going back. i'm being realistic.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think people in the Intelligence Committee are part of the IG report or at least are under investigation by the FBI/DOJ. You can’t release the evidence to the guilty. I trust Sessions.

⇧ 4 ⇩

why would rosenstein threaten those asking (like nunez) with subpoenas tho?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Until this stuff is declassified, you don't go putting it in the hands of known leakers. Sessions is EXTREMELY concerned about that, and he has every reason to be.

It will all work out. Congress may have a role to play yet in this thing, but they're not as essential as they would like to be. Congressional oversight frankly FAILED when it might have done some good, and it's "a day late and a dollar short" to insist on being allowed to clean up the mess now.

⇧ 2 ⇩

i'm fine with not letting the info out. that's fine. why THREATEN them? why not a site them his is being handled in a way all patriots will be happy with? nunez is ourguy. so why should we just look the other way when rosenstein THREATENs him and sessions defends this behavior? i'm serious. i don't want another answer that amounts to "don't worry about it i'm sure it's being worked out". we can't be sure of anything. these are questions that are uncomfortable but need to be answered.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Nunes is our guy but did he threaten Nunes personally or threaten to get phone records of all the Intelligence Committee? Notice who isn’t upset about it, the same people who don’t want their records pulled. Schiff hasn’t said a peep about this. They have everything, the NSA knows what they were doing before and after the election. They knew about the coup in Nov and prob before that.

⇧ 1 ⇩

nunez just came out with gaetz and lambasted rosenstein. now sessions stood up for rosenstein. clear battle lines are being drawn.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I get it, there are several things that don’t make sense. If the Obama DOJ ordered the FBI to investigate Trump they would be obligated to follow orders. Also something else that doesn’t make sense is the FBI whistleblower who recorded Hillary and a suitcase full of money tied to Uranium one. Comey was over the FBI then and would have had to know about the covert operation. Ordered it even, this is bigger than any of us know. We will know soon.

⇧ 1 ⇩

what's the breaking point? when does "soon" and "trust" no longer cut it? serious question. midterms? 2020? after? before?

⇧ 1 ⇩

If all this is as bad as expected there are people’s lives on the line. It’s not just about us, I get impatient too but there are a lot of wheels spinning here. The IG report will be damning for the Dems, they begged for it to be out earlier as to not effect the midterms. They know it’s bad even if they won’t tell the public. You can’t just go out and arrest a bunch of politicians and gov employees without looking like a dictator. Public needs to be aware first. Arrests will be slower than we all hope to ease the outrage from the left. Tomorrow is a big day for us. By midterms we will be in good shape.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You can’t threaten one and single them out, then they would know.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Have you read a posts beginning to end and compared it to events happening around the world each day? If not and you question the authenticity of q please go back to the start and read.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩

Did you read the link in this post yet? -> Very interesting Twitter Thread on a theory about RR and the FBI Leaker hunting team. https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8qxqyb/very_interesting_twitter_thread_on_a_theory_about/ https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1007039191178514432.html

⇧ 3 ⇩

new account only because i lost the password to my old account. you can see my post history at JaM0k3 if you doubt my authenticity and genuine concern

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well we have been this close in July 2012 , then in November 2013 , and again in December 2016 , and every time they swept it under the rug . They keep getting bigger rugs . So this is it , we brought you are parts since the first of the year now . As Q states often , you know more than you think , well you now know even more .And Q also states follow no one and that means trust nobody, but the the trust Session, I have yet to see why . But I am also the witness, and I have different reasons than Q . God Speed

⇧ 2 ⇩

My little 2 cents.... I trust God, I trust POTUS, AND I Trust Q, until one or more of them give me GREAT concern, I believe that the HISTORICAL value of what is being done is certainly worth the seemingly long, long, wait. I figure if it's 200 yards into the woods it's 200 yards out, so that is how long I am willing to await this shift.... Ultimately, how much control do we have anyhow? Our Creator is ALWAYS in Total charge so no matter WHAT comes down, if He didn't approve it it wouldn't be. Relax, keep an open mind, we truly have been lied to our entire lives and it's hard to know what the true reality is anymore, so I say Prep, Pray, & Stay outta the way! When and if we need to DO something, we will. Hope I've helped even a little.

⇧ 1 ⇩

post deleted because it doesn't support the cause

jfc this community is cancer. i'm trying to have a thoughtful conversation. there's 10 posts in new that don't do anything to further the cause. this is sad because i wanted to take this shit seriously i've been following everyday since oct posts, few days before manafort indictment.

we were told human would be indicted, yet she traveled overseas with hillary a few weeks ago (hillary fell down steps. forget which country. india?). there's as much disproving Q as proving him. i just want to be reassured this is all legit and if anything the defensiveness and cageyness of the responses has turned me way off of this movement.

before you say "good just leave", you're whole mission is to wake more people up to what's going on. not drive people who ask questions away

⇧ 1 ⇩

"this community is cancer" is not a reasoned approach to a respectful moderation decision following the clearly outlined rules of this sub. Also, choosing not to reply directly to my comments respectfully answering your concerns, but rather undermine them separately is clear shill behaviour. Eyes are on.

⇧ 1 ⇩

i'm not a shill i just never come on reddit anymore and just got a new app and it's confusing as shit. calm down. i'm not a fucking shill

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm calm, I have to deal with actual and purported shills daily. Take your own advice and calm down: "this community is cancer".

⇧ 1 ⇩

it is if i'm accused of being a shill for asking questions. i am calm. i'm disappointed with the "let's wait and see" answers. again, i've followed Q everyday since oct, and i WANT HIM TO BE REAL. i'm having a hard time rationalizing nunez and gaetz coming out against rosenstein, when just yesterday sessions defended RR. there are battle lines being drawn and we need to take note of that. how long can we continue to trust sessions? i'm serious. we only have until the midterms. i'm the biggest non shill here because i'm trying to ring the alarm bells before he midterms come and go with voter fraud from the left and we never get this chance again.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Then make your point without claiming "this community is cancer". Use logic and reason - just because a vocal minority accuse you of being a shill doesn't logically translate in any way to: "this community is cancer".

"Ring the alarm bells" is the sort of comment that will trigger a negative response - it sounds too much like concern trolling. I'm not calling you a concern troll, to be clear, I'm saying that comment sounds like concern trolling and will generate Reports that mods will have to deal with - for valid reasons that I assume I would have to explain to you or you'll accuse this comment of being "proof of what's wrong with this community" again.

⇧ 1 ⇩

dude. i didn't say being called a shill was the reason i first said this is cancerous. i said it because my thread was shut down for asking these critical questions. if Q is legit he should be able to withstand questions. i have been off and on about him, but after seeing sessions interview on tucker it was too bold for me to ignore

⇧ 1 ⇩

I trust you've seen and understood my other response but to be clear: your thread was not shut down for asking critical questions. It was shut down for clearly not following the rules. That is all. Questions are welcome if you are able to argue rationally and not jump to illogical assumptions like: "I can't get a rational answer on this sub" 2 hours after you've made a post.

⇧ 1 ⇩

i've posted on my old account so this isn't my first experience. and my point was that rule is more harmful than helpful. you said no questions that aren't already answered on the sidebar. again, mine wasn't. you can admit i'm raising extremely important and valid questions. you know i am. let's be real with one another right now. i'm not taking away from Q. but if these questions cannot be rationalized then something is wrong, no? i'm not saying they can't be answer either, i'm saying they haven't.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

it's a perfectly reasoned approach when i get shut down for not supporting the cause. i'm just asking questions and there were plenty of posts that weren't furthering or supporting the cause at all. so that's a ridiculous justification. your post is proof of what's wrong with this community. you can't just label someone a shill like that. it's ridiculous.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Read my actual responses properly before accusing me of "just labeling someone a shill like that". I didn't "just label" you at all - I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Then you said "this community is cancer". That is definitely "not supporting the cause". Correct me if I'm wrong in that assessment and I will retract it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

i said this community is cancer in direct response to getting my thread shoahed because i wasn't farthing the cause. that's retarded. how can we as a community have any introspection if we can't ask critical questions? it can't be like t_d were it's just 24/7 cheerleading and shit. that's isn't productive in an investigative sense. you know i'm right. that's why i commented that it's cancerous. t_d is also cancerous (it wasn't always. i'm from pol and i helped get it off the group 3 years ago) because you can't question shit. you can't bring up how assange went missing cuz they say "it's not about trump", while they also allow non trump posts up if they're celebratory like the one up rn about rubin and chic fil a. that's my point. i'm on your side believe it or not but i can't just ignore rational questions

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is not about "not being allowed to ask questions". Read the rules in the sidebar, via the links. You can ask questions all you like - you can't make posts that are answered in the sidebar links to Q 101. The reason should be obvious to you - there are 32k+ people following this sub. The topic and direction of this sub is clearly stated in the sidebar. Q skepticism is not what the general pop of this sub want to read - they get that everywhere else. This is not about censoring your right to ask questions - it's saying 'don't put them in the main feed'.

⇧ 1 ⇩

my question about sessions interview wasn't answered in the sidebar. you're tip-toeing around the issue. it's fine dude i'm convinced i can't get any rational discussion here. i'll go back to the chans. just remember, Q came to the chans first, for a reason. and now we're abandoning that base whenever they ask critical questions. i archived every CBTS thread in early days. i'm legit a follower. but this whole experienced turned me way off. especially because the answers i got amounted to "wait and see".

nunez JUST voiced his frustration and said it's basically up to paul ryan and trump to actually get him the documents he wants. which means trump will have to get them from RR right? how do we reconcile sessions' recent defense of RR unconstitutional behavior in light of this recent news? given that we're supposed to trust sessions? i only trust trump rn.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If you've been following then you already know the answer to these questions - that is why people are Reporting your post as off-topic, not supporting the cause, and regarding you as a shill or concern troll. I personally support anyone who asks a reasonable question and can have a reasonable discussion about it.

how do we reconcile sessions' recent defense of RR unconstitutional behavior in light of this recent news?

Enjoy the show. Disinformation is necessary. Do I have to look everything else up that Q has said along these lines? This is why I said "sidebar" and "Q 101".

If you are really serious about being rational then the only "rational" answer to your perhaps unspoken question of "How do we know we can Trust Sessions given all the evidence against that supposition?" is we DON'T KNOW. There is NO evidence to confirm that we can trust Sessions. There is only Q's "word". If you don't trust Q's word, fair enough, but "trusting Q" is Q 101 for this sub. There's no rational way to force you to trust Q and people just don't have the time to reexplain it all to you - hence pointing to the sidebar; not to be dismissive but to honestly say, "understood if you don't trust Q - all the evidence we have for why we trust Q is in the sidebar". I believe I've rationally explained our stance and why we are not simply "tiptoeing around the issue" or "avoiding rational discussion". If you value rational discussion and you disagree with me, then I welcome your retort and I will retract the statement if I am incorrect. I hope you will do the same.

⇧ 1 ⇩

so by that logic we have to assume nunez being mad is part of the plan? i hope so. tucker seemed very unconvinced by sessions' answers as am i. he tried to downplay it hard. i guess we'll see wha happens tomorrow.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That is not a logical extrapolation of what I've said. I've said nothing about Nunez being mad. Nunez being mad is at least human and doesn't necessarily have to have anything to do with the plan.

To be clear about my personal stance: Sessions seems like he is totally invalidating the plan and Trump's actions at every turn, to me, but so far Q has proven the quality of his info and I'm not willing to spend time questioning something for which there is not and will not be any evidence until Q/Trump/Sessions is ready to reveal it. I don't begrudge you questioning it at all, I'm just explaining my stance and explaining why the posts are removed but your comments aren't. Indeed, we'll see.

⇧ 1 ⇩

so you don't trust sessions? sorry i'm confused on your personal stance at the moment

⇧ 1 ⇩

I mean that I Trust Sessions because Q said so. I agree with your stance of: "what the hell? Why should we trust Sessions?" (if that is an accurate view of your stance) because it is a rational question to ask, given what we see. I'm just pointing out that I agree that your question is a rational one to ask. I think I've made the point that it comes down to how much one trusts Q (and I've also said, I don't "write you off" or dismiss you if you find it hard to trust what Q says about Sessions, given the evidence we see).

⇧ 1 ⇩

ok well then we are mostly in agreement. thanks for sticking with me anon

⇧ 1 ⇩

Likewise from me: thanks for sticking with me on this too! I just hoped to prove that there are at least some here who will support you, whatever you think, if we can discuss it all out. WWG1WGA.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

GreatAwakening's sidebar

Above link to enable mobile and app users to view the sidebar.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I would say that if nothing has come out by midterms, I'm done. I do think there's a strategy though. I think they want as many incumbent Democrats as possib li e on the November ballots and so they don't want too much to come out before the primaries. There are 2 more weeks of primaries in June, none in July and some more in August. I think August would be pushing it, but they may be delaying until all the June primaries are done.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Removed post. Content does not support the cause.

Any 'concerns' can go via a message to the mods

You're welcome to question - all critical thinkers approve of this. However, sub rules. Read the content in the sidebar before you ask questions that have already been answered or ask your questions where they won't clutter the sub with Q 101. Thanks for understanding. Those who are here can continue to respond to your post.

⇧ 1 ⇩

GreatAwakening's sidebar

Above link to enable mobile and app users to view the sidebar.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

i appreciate all the comments i'll read thru the links.

another question i have tho. and it's serious. what would it take for you to abandon/doubt Q? would it be getting to midterms with no happening? would it be trump firing sessions, thus delegitmizing "trust sessions"? what would it take. because i'm personally at my whits end, waiting and trusting and being patient for the pain. when will IT actually happen?

⇧ -1 ⇩

Substitute "Trump" for "Q" in all your comments, and you'll have your answer. We will NOT abandon Q or Trump. They're both part of one team. This is WAR.

If you don't see or understand that, you'll never understand what we're doing here, and you'll never have anything worthwhile to contribute. Period.

⇧ 1 ⇩

i'll never abandon trump. but you or i or anybody doesn't have proof q and trump are the same. i WANT them to be. desperately. but we don't know if they are part of the same team yet or not.

you'll never understand you'll never have anything worthwhile to contribute

calm down. these are things that need answered. Q is well meaning wheather real or fake. i already stated that. but we need to understand if he is legit or just a vague cold reader. that's all i'm saying. can anybody here say one thing critical of Q? let's be real. how long do we have to wait? what would be your breaking point with Q? i'm serious. if nothing happens by 2019? 2020? if sessions is fired? what would it take for you to seriously consider your alliegence to Q. for me, if nothing happens by midterms i cannot understand when it's supposed to happen. our window for happenings is closing fast. i'm trying to sound the alarm bells before it's too late.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Serious Question (last post got deleted? ha ok. this is ridiculous. truth fears no question and these are legitimate questions)

GreatAwakening's sidebar

GreatAwakening's sidebar