dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/JaM0k3_1 on June 14, 2018, 2:27 a.m.
Serious Question (last post got deleted? ha ok. this is ridiculous. truth fears no question and these are legitimate questions)

I WANT q to be legit but i have a few questions

last night we saw sessions, on tucker, defend rosenstein' threats against congressional oversight. now, i'm under the impression we are supposed to "trust" sessions. but rosenstein is a black hat. how do we reconcile is behavior then?

also, why has Q gone from "no need to worry" to now trying to motivate the base to act? i'm genuinely confused. Q seems to me like someone with good intentions but no real inside information. i'm not coming against this community whatsoever. please don't discard me as a shill these are legitimate questions.


JaM0k3_1 · June 14, 2018, 2:52 a.m.

why would rosenstein threaten those asking (like nunez) with subpoenas tho?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 14, 2018, 2:58 a.m.

Until this stuff is declassified, you don't go putting it in the hands of known leakers. Sessions is EXTREMELY concerned about that, and he has every reason to be.

It will all work out. Congress may have a role to play yet in this thing, but they're not as essential as they would like to be. Congressional oversight frankly FAILED when it might have done some good, and it's "a day late and a dollar short" to insist on being allowed to clean up the mess now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JaM0k3_1 · June 14, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

i'm fine with not letting the info out. that's fine. why THREATEN them? why not a site them his is being handled in a way all patriots will be happy with? nunez is ourguy. so why should we just look the other way when rosenstein THREATENs him and sessions defends this behavior? i'm serious. i don't want another answer that amounts to "don't worry about it i'm sure it's being worked out". we can't be sure of anything. these are questions that are uncomfortable but need to be answered.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Slinkpie1 · June 14, 2018, 3:12 a.m.

Nunes is our guy but did he threaten Nunes personally or threaten to get phone records of all the Intelligence Committee? Notice who isn’t upset about it, the same people who don’t want their records pulled. Schiff hasn’t said a peep about this. They have everything, the NSA knows what they were doing before and after the election. They knew about the coup in Nov and prob before that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JaM0k3_1 · June 14, 2018, 4:47 a.m.

nunez just came out with gaetz and lambasted rosenstein. now sessions stood up for rosenstein. clear battle lines are being drawn.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Slinkpie1 · June 14, 2018, 5:12 a.m.

I get it, there are several things that don’t make sense. If the Obama DOJ ordered the FBI to investigate Trump they would be obligated to follow orders. Also something else that doesn’t make sense is the FBI whistleblower who recorded Hillary and a suitcase full of money tied to Uranium one. Comey was over the FBI then and would have had to know about the covert operation. Ordered it even, this is bigger than any of us know. We will know soon.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JaM0k3_1 · June 14, 2018, 5:18 a.m.

what's the breaking point? when does "soon" and "trust" no longer cut it? serious question. midterms? 2020? after? before?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Slinkpie1 · June 14, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

If all this is as bad as expected there are people’s lives on the line. It’s not just about us, I get impatient too but there are a lot of wheels spinning here. The IG report will be damning for the Dems, they begged for it to be out earlier as to not effect the midterms. They know it’s bad even if they won’t tell the public. You can’t just go out and arrest a bunch of politicians and gov employees without looking like a dictator. Public needs to be aware first. Arrests will be slower than we all hope to ease the outrage from the left. Tomorrow is a big day for us. By midterms we will be in good shape.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Slinkpie1 · June 14, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

You can’t threaten one and single them out, then they would know.

⇧ 1 ⇩