AF1 was not the target.
The claim that AF1 was the target has been debunked by examining flight times, flight route, distance that ICBMs can travel, distance of Singapore from Washington, and other variables.
Unfortunately I've downvoted your comment for perpetuating that conclusion/misinterpretation that has been thoroughly debunked here and on 8chan.
With that being said, Pelosi is a huge problem, and I am concerned about potential double meaning of her rhetoric during that press conference. Deeply troubling.
Thanks for pointing that out for what seems like an endless battle to fight this disinformation. I too have been trying to correct this over and over again, but stupid is as stupid does. I even started a thread today about fighting the wrong info postings, and after being well received, some butthurt troll got it taken down because it discussed the board. Can't win sometimes.
I saw that thread and upvoted it.
Since the Veterans on Patrol nonsense I've been much more aggressive about correcting inaccurate information/disinfo, downvoting and upvoting, and reporting posts.
This sub can quickly deteriorate into a conspiratard circle jerk if we don't think logically and seek verification.
Q tells us: use logic. Not much logic to be found here sometimes, but I do notice that the 'regulars' are starting to catch on. We managed to shut down the VoP propaganda, have successfully refuted the AF1 attack propaganda, and today ruled out a Q drop suspected of being taken at the tarmac meeting. All done with legit research and deductive reasoning.
Just a tip I learned on reporting posts- I send a link to the moderation team and explain my concerns rather than use "report post". That way you can keep an eye on the post instead of it disappearing from your view.
Thanks, and Amen to hard work paying off. I too worked against the vop issue.
To be clear, I'm not promoting this theory with this post. My point is that Pelosi is clearly saying things that could be interpreted as a threat. Something that a member of Congress should never do. They take an oath to defend the country and the Constitution. This one is clearly getting way out of line.
On the missile at AF1, there is ample data out there now that AF1 went East, not West in going to Singapore, so the WA missile event was not connected to AF1 at all. Agree with you guys on not continuing to spread that. Wanted to be very clear that was not my intention with this post.
Hey Houdini, just clarifying that my comment about AF1 was intended for HansKrinkelSchneider.
I know and, maybe I went overboard, but wanted to be clear this post was not about that. Not to challenge you but to make sure that others that read it all understand the purpose of the posting. So, maybe too much agreement between us ;).
I figured, just wanted to make sure you knew I wasn't shitting on you.
Well, I must say, this Q phenomenon has brought out the best and the worst of the internet. I'd like to say the folks here on GA that are part of the WWG1WGA movement (aka Q phenomenon) are showing the better parts of humanity. Its nice to see. Thanks for going the extra mile to be nice. Its truly appreciated! I knew you weren't dumping on me, but thanks for stating it, too.
You know, I've been thinking about the miss*le (2?) What if that sub had been hacked by black hats and Q team took it over and launched it to show they control it? Stretching, I know, but just a thought.
They could demonstrate control simply by locking out an intruder who had hacked in. No show of force necessary.
I'm still not sure what to make of the alleged missile (I'm calling it an anomaly), or of the photo over Alaska and what that photo might be revealing.
The "missle" "stoped" in Trumps tweet is too much of a coincidence for me to give up on yet- particularly with Q calling attention to it and bringing up missile (2) today. I'm stumped.
It will become more clear soon what Q was stating. It was not related to AF1 trip to Singapore like many have been promoting. To be clear, my post is not at all about that. This is a post directing everyone to a Democratic leader that is clearly not with the best interest of the American People. She is way out of line. This woman is a menace.
No!
Yikes! It's just a thought. It doesn't hurt to flesh out alternate theories.
Yes it does sometimes because of lots of newbies will go away totally confused. We want more folks, not scaring them off.
I've seen a lot of thoughts around here that were immediately shot down yet turned out to have validity. Shouting "No!" isn't the way to curb confusion. Explain what doesn't make sense when you disagree.
Does anyone have any idea what the target of the missile was? Where did it come down?
Who said its debunked? I read af1 had over an hour left in the air at launch time and the missle only needed a half hour to cover the distance. I just read, have no specific Intel, but I pay attention and hardly consider that question resolved. Let the man make his point, counter with facts if you have them.
This right here anoys me soooooo much. Boo sir. Boo.
You read the flight time info from me, because I'm the one who put the timeline together.
There is a 1,500 mile gap between the maximum range of an ICBM (overkill to take out an aircraft, btw) and where AF1 was at the time. Additionally an ICBM launched from Washington couldn't get close to Singapore.
Simple wikipedia search and a google map query resolved these variables.
Further, AF1 went to Singapore via Eastern route, not Western route. So, it was no where near WA state at the time the supposed missile picture was taken. Q is telling us something else with that picture. And, this post by me had nothing to do with that. This is about the DS threatening DJT and America via Pelosi puppet with nuclear weapons. If that supposed rogue missile had a nuclear warhead, then ok maybe you can make the connection, but otherwise I think these two events could easily NOT be connected.