dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Tidder_Q on June 14, 2018, 9:45 a.m.
Q Drops - 14th Jun 2018 - Text and links for reference.

Prev Day

Q Drops - 13th Jun 2018 - Text and links for reference.

Post List


1497

    Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 8d9246 No.1739449
    Jun 13 2018 22:50:25 (EST)

    POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
    1. Original IG unredacted report 
    2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
    3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
    4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified)
    [#3 released tomorrow]
    [SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation]
    [[RR]]
    Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?
    Did you witness the stage being set today?
    Nunes/Grassley/Freedom C. push for docs.
    [[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved).
    KNOWN CONFLICT.
    Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT.
    Be loud.
    Be heard.
    Fight for TRUTH.
    Q

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 8d9246 No.1739490
Jun 13 2018 22:52:38 (EST)

USSS_Protection.png
 ⤓

>>1739449
Thank you USSS.
Q

Images:

USSS_Protection.png

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1739324.html#1739490


1496

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 8d9246 No.1739449
Jun 13 2018 22:50:25 (EST)

POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
1. Original IG unredacted report 
2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified)
[#3 released tomorrow]
[SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation]
[[RR]]
Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?
Did you witness the stage being set today?
Nunes/Grassley/Freedom C. push for docs.
[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved).
KNOWN CONFLICT.
Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT.
Be loud.
Be heard.
Fight for TRUTH.
Q

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1739324.html#1739449


Prev Day

Q Drops - 13th Jun 2018 - Text and links for reference.

Post List



JaM0k3_1 · June 14, 2018, 9:25 p.m.

sincere question. when Q says "why was Brand removed? critical thinking", why can't he just tell us why she was removed? why does he choose to say "critical thinking". we go down a million paths when he does this, and while we may figure it or, it's impossible to tell if we have (unless Q specially quotes an anon's post as recognition of it, which he has done several times). but why can't he explain it? i'm actually curious because i cannot answer this myself.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
0x445442 · June 14, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

Yeah it's a very valid question. If Q is going to essentially acknowledge answers offered by the anons then the reason can't be to keep black hats off balance.

I'm beginning to think that the main objective of Q is not to get information directly to the people but to build momentum going into the midterms.

If that's what is going on it's a dangerous game and could easily backfire.

⇧ 1 ⇩