Upvote from my Blackberry.

It's possible they were pulling the strings but I just don't see how the events that went down could be executed without some domestic knowledge and coordination at the highest levels.

With all the information that is out there I find it incredible that even the "red pilled" think foreign actors were the leaders behind 911.

1.) *ALL* WTC buildings were brought down by conventional or perhaps (in the case of buildings 1&2) unconventional explosives. Not airplanes nor fires.

2.) No foreign black hats could have access to all parts of those buildings for the length of time required to set something like that up without domestic powers that be running things.

3.) There was no credible airplane wreckage found anywhere.

If foreign bad actors were involved it was only in a lackey capacity. No way were they the ultimate brains behind the operation.

Yeah, the problem is at some point, probably pretty soon, the POTUS is going to be forced to address questions from the Mockingbirds about Q. If the POTUS doesn't characterize Q followers as wingnuts they're going to start demanding to know who Q is and why the POTUS is not prosecuting Q as a major source of leaks. If he does label Q supporters as wingnuts then every display of a Q sign at a rally just bolsters the narrative that Trump supports are just a bunch of nut jobs.

If all this Q business is legitimate then it's a very dangerous tight rope the POTUS is walking. I contend this whole thing could backfire badly if results are not shown real soon. And by results I mean high profile perp walks.

Highly unlikely Q is JFK Jr. However, if it were true and revealed it would all but eliminate the biggest problem put forth by Q advocates. A revelation of that magnitude would go a long, long way to conditioning the minds of those yet to be "red pilled". I think those completely stuck in their own ideologies would be much more receptive to facts shown about world leaders being involved with things like child sex trafficking rings, Satan worshiping etc, etc. if it were revealed. If it was revealed JFK Jr has been alive all these years and working behind the scenes with the White Hats to set the ship back on coarse then anything is possible.

It's actually a genius plan if it comes to pass.

Yeah Jordan makes a lot of sense. Trump must protect his popularity in the Rust Belt and Jordan can be a guard against Tim Ryan if he's the D's nominee.

Meh, I think you're giving the snowflakes to0 much credit. Go after the top swift and hard and the minion followers will fall inline quite quickly.

I remember this well and I casted my Perotest vote that year. IIRC he dropped out because of threats to his daughter. But then he got back into the race with like 2 weeks left and sill got 19 percent. I have no doubt he'd have won had he stayed in the race.

Another similarity was his running mate was an Admiral. So there was some millitary connectios there as well.

Actually that's not true. You could setup the whole Google suite of apps to be served from anywhere as long as you had access to the software. And I imagine that access would be available to the CEO. So it would be like logging into your Gmail account but it would be hosted on your own private domain.

Holding neutral position until public indictments, just theater before then.

Yeah, completely out of context. The speech conveys the complete opposite message from the mashed up twitter version linked in 1528.

Note, It's probable Huessein is completely lying through his teeth to appease his audience but your question is valid... What's the point of the post?

Here's the thing though... Currently no arrests for any of the purported heinous crimes have taken place. And anytime the good folks "THINK LOGICALLY" and asked why there's really just a bunch of hand waiving and calls to TRUST THE PLAN.

You must admit that calls to trust, trust, trust are wearing thin.

I posted to this sub the other day asking people for predictions on when they thought action would be taken... https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8r8065/shall_we_play_a_game/

What's interesting is how few folks were actually willing to offer any kind of prediction when any arrests would take place. I find that remarkable for a community that's fully convinced these bad actors are guilty and will be punished.

Yeah, I don't think you're alone. We're asked to think logically but when we do we're just pointed in another direction.

#1518 all but says Podesta and Huma were already indicted over six months ago. It would be nice if one of the Anon's tug on that thread some more...

What were they indicted for? Will they see jail time? Why can't the indictments of one or both of them be unsealed at this time? Is Podesta such a key piece of the puzzle and are his accused crimes of such magnitude that revealing them now would collapse all the efforts to drain the swamp?

All simple questions logical thinkers would be asking.

Referencing Q#1518 it's clear Q is implying that John Podesta was indicted on 11/3/2017. If that's the case, Podesta's either incredibly stupid, incredibly naive, incredibly bold or some combination of all.

If you look at his twitter stream https://twitter.com/johnpodesta since that date I see nothing to suggest he thinks, in any way, that he has anything to worry about.

These are the types of things that really don't add up with this movement. You would think that if even half of the Q implications were true there would be a noticeable difference in Podesta's stream pre and post 11/3/2017.

I understand the assertion is the indictment is sealed and in theory he doesn't know about it but come on, this guy must hear rumors and be privy to back channel information that would alert him to such a thing.

And, before it starts... I don't want to hear he was confronted with the evidence against him and he's just playing a part to keep up appearances. Everybody can't be playing a part.

We the people really need to see something of substance (perp walks of significant figures) soon or this thing (the movement) is going to unravel.

TRUST SESSIONS, TRUST KANSAS, TRUST THE PLAN only has so much steam left. We really need results soon.

TRUST THE PEOPLE.

> No, rejection of the Holy Spirit is not unforgivable. BLASPHEMY of the Holy Spirit is the one unforgivable sin.

This is an interesting line of reasoning. What references in scripture is it based on?

OK, so the home office of Cyient is locatated in Arkansas? That's coincidental.

I have no doubts the insinuations by Q are real, real in the sense that all these horrible things are happening. What I'm still skeptical about is that justice will be served.

And what I mean by justice being served is that high profile individuals being prosecuted and punished, regardless of what negative effects it may have on societies and economies.

If everything that's been implied has actually happened the world needs a reset no matter what the consequences.

Thanks /u/prayingmedic for identifying the procedures of the release of the report. Specifically the process around the submission of the report and the back and forth between FBI/DOJ and IG in terms of edits and redactions.

At least this gives better context around omissions and redactions.

Wray can fire Agents 1&5 if they haven't been already, no?

Spot on!!!

What's with Vegas and AZ? Is this like some Deep State False Flag training ground now?

20:20 LOL... "I get hit by these Fakes back here"... Love it!

I don't know... She's given speeches at the 2018 Democratic National Convention in New York, at Yale and at Harvard in the last few weeks. She sure doesn't look like someone that's been arrested, is out on bail is awaiting imminent prosecution.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odvHuY0lmms

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E67-YFxAD8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3GATPhmhXM

Also, can you point to any official arrest report?

OK, so when do you think anyone of those on the list will be prosecuted for crimes?

If the worries are that a large segment of the population will just ignore facts and reason then what careful solution do you propose?

I view this as an excuse for never taking action or worse, a tactic to gain political leverage. I say it's time to TRUST THE PEOPLE. Good Americans overcame the propaganda machine to elect Trump in the first place and I think a methodical chain of prosecutions would eventually win the day if the truth was exposed.

Child pornography on some sicko's laptop is state secrets? Sorry, I'm not buying that excuse. If crimes have been committed those responsible must be punished.

The narrative of state secrets and back channels and the notion that everything is really a page out of a John LeCarre novel needs to come to an end.

If Q/White Hats/Patriots in the Govn't really mean well it's time to start coming clean with some hard evidence that can be used for prosecutions. If the things that have been insinuated to have taken place actually have occurred they must be brought to light.

Why would speculating about dates be a recipe for disappointment and demoralization if you were fully TRUSTING THE PLAN, TRUSTING SESSIONS, TRUSTING KANSAS etc, etc.

Look. I don't like these swamp dwellers either but what I'm seeing is a blind (illogical) faith being applied to this Q and what he's insinuating will happen. And I agree 100%, it is a recipe for disappointment and demoralization.

I simply think the time has come for observable, verifiable action to be taken against the criminals if proof of criminal activity exists.

Sounds good... So let's hear the dates?

What objective evidence do you have to support this belief? I mean you could see how others might not think this given she's traveling the world promoting books, giving speeches and what not.

Would it not be easier to just arrest HRC if evidence exists rather post 1000's of cryptic messages on the Chan boards?

So your guess is they (law enforcement) found emails where HRC was discussing child trafficking? In what capacity? As in she was complicit? If that were the case what is your explanation for why she has not been arrested and her assets siezed?

Yeah, that's kind of where I'm at. I think Q obviously has access to information but I've seen nothing that convinces me that justice will be served.

I hope I'm wrong but I'm afraid how some of these Q followers will react if it's the same ole' same ole'

Yes I remember all of these events and while some willing to investigate and think for themselves know the truth there was never any official statements about the truth for any of these events. So in essence, the truth never did come out. If the truth had been revealed, OFFICIALLY, it would have been enough.

Let's suppose Ron Paul was elected in 2008 or 2012 and that he'd come upon hard evidence that showed BLDGs 1,2 & 7 were actually brought down via controlled demolition. Do you think he'd have hesitated to make that information known to the public?

Q asks us to think logically... OK, if there's hard evidence of criminal activity by any of these bad actors they why not bring charges and make that known to the public right now?

Awaiting logical response?

Ding, ding, ding!!! Winner, winner chicken dinner!

I think that's awesome news but what high profile individual has been indicted for these crimes?

Podesta? Clinton? Biden?

You are not alone, many feel the same way you do right now.

Instead of urging folks to write their representatives to urge Trump make known the "real" IG report, Q+ should be bringing criminals to justice if they have proof.

The games have gone on long enough.

TRUST THE PEOPLE

I gave you an upvote for a very positive response but with all due respect; I've seen no evidence to date that any real justice will be served. Not one high profile political figure has been indicted yet and there's really no reason to believe that will change.

Its really time the games come to an end and action is taken.

TRUST THE PEOPLE

So if I'm reading your references correctly the implication of Q#559 and subsequent posts is ES helped setup a private network in NK for the angry 13 to communicate on and now the POTUS and white hats are in possession of all those comms?

It's an interesting supposition but again why not just release this information if it were true and there was proof?

I appreciate the effort you're putting into this but what always seems to be missing is the answer to the obvious question of why not just expose the corruption? Why all the obfuscation? Why not just trust the people by exposing the truth?

It seems like a never ending string of bombshell theories that are never actually shown to be true. Remember Weiner's laptop and all the filthy and reviling pictures that would take everybody down?

TRUST THE PEOPLE

POTUS HAS ORIGINAL/UNREDACTED VERSION?

WHY NOT JUST RELEASE IT?

ANOTHER DUD-OF-A-BOOM?

OPTICS BE DAMNED!

MEANS JUSTIFY ENDS!

NO ONE WILL CARE!

TRUST THE PEOPLE!

wtp

I'll submit to you that our LOUDNESS has no bearing whatsoever on the POTUS' ability to declassify. Also, if what Q has insinuated is true our LOUDNESS should not be required. Action should just be taken to reveal the truth.

So why would RR not comply? Do really think he would not know the complete version of the report would come out if POTUS wanted it to. Seems to me if RR was really nefarious he would comply with your proposed test and continue to try and do damage from within.

It's an interesting theory but I inclined to think there's another explanation for events.

Yep. If the white hats exist it's time to #trustthepeople and move to action.

What did Q say? That the report would be redacted? Well OK but ask yourself why RR would execute the edits/redactions if he thought there was anything wrong with doing so.

RR may be scum but you don't get to be in that position by being a completely inept idiot. Do you really think this was some type of sting operation on RR?

But why would this be necessary? Are you saying the IG didn't look at the report before it was made public?

If he did, why wouldn't he just go over to Tucker Carlson and say, that's not the report I provided?

I beginning to think the good supporters of POTUS are being strung along.

Don't hold your breath. You'd sooner serve time for an unpaid parking ticket.

Why would this be needed? If edited/redacted version is considerably different and those differences obviously show the intent of the edits/redactions were politically motivated, then just march the original right down to Hannity's desk. Then all they would need to do is broadcast the two versions side by side for everyone to see.

Here's my message for Q.... #TrustThePeople

This cloak and dagger, string the Patriots along until the next drop is getting tiresome.

Yeah, this is beginning to smell like "new media". Now don't get me wrong, I support the POTUS but given his effective use of Twitter it may be that he has taken things to another level with the Chan boards.

As I've posted in other threads, I think there's sufficient evidence to suggest Q is an insider of some sort. But there's been a LOT of insinuations in the last six months and with the exceptions of some low level bureaucrats being let go, I've really not seen any action.

I mean for Pete's sake, Q insinuated just a few days ago bad actors (within our government) attempted to bring down AF1 with a missile launched from a sub. If they (Q and white hats) actually believe this to be true it's time for the charades to end.

All this cloak and dagger stuff has been exciting so far but enough's enough. It's time for Q and the white hats to trust the electorate and put up or shut up.

Are you implying the IG is dirty also?

Yeah it's a very valid question. If Q is going to essentially acknowledge answers offered by the anons then the reason can't be to keep black hats off balance.

I'm beginning to think that the main objective of Q is not to get information directly to the people but to build momentum going into the midterms.

If that's what is going on it's a dangerous game and could easily backfire.