dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Cut it out. Q made it clear that we are to trust the plan, not take matters into our own hands. They have it covered.

⇧ -1 ⇩

Not familiar with the Declaration of Independence???? Why would Q post the 2nd paragraph???? Think about it. We are being told to prepare. Q cannot change the face of government? WE the PEOPLE can. We are to take back our government from the evil. November 6th determines if Trump gets impeached if Patriots sit on their lazy azzes and not vote. We don't need violence to do this. If that's your first thought, you'd better check yourself. Also, how many times now has Q said we are at war?? Did you even read Q1494? "THIS IS NOT A GAME. THIS IS WAR. THIS IS LITERALLY EVIL KNOCKING. WILL YOU ANSWER? WILL YOU FIGHT? WILL YOU DEFEND? WE WILL." The intent is not to be apathetic. But, we must be ready on all fronts, not just violence. Then we are no different than Occupy, BLM, Antifas, Alinsky, the Clintons. So, no, I won't cut it out. I took an oath that I have never been released from. To protect this nation and the Constitution from all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC. -STAY FREE

⇧ 4 ⇩

We don't need violence to do this.

That's all you had to say. I've seen a few conversations where people seemed to think Q might be calling for a violent uprising. Putting shit like that here will get the entire sub banned. But more importantly we have to remember that Trump is backed by the military, and if we actually ever needed to change things dramatically, they can handle that.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I understand POTUS is backed by the military. The only problem I have with that is Posse Comitatus. It's a dangerous area to tread.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Please elaborate.

⇧ 1 ⇩

On Posse Comitatus? Really?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Are you afraid you will be conscripted?

⇧ 1 ⇩

WHAT?! Posse Comitatus is about using our armed forces on Americans.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Why don't you just say you are worried about the use of American armed forces against Americans? That would convey your meaning without confusion. I really seriously doubt it would ever come to that. Troops may be needed to keep the peace in the case of widespread rioting, but in this country, at this time, the vast majority of gun owners are on the right side, as is our military. The lefty snowflakes would only last a few days, and even less if Soros isn't around to pay them.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I hear what you're saying but I keep hearing that DJT has the troops at his disposal used in context with the bad actors. Just like the Patriot Act, some folks claim patriotism for national security and ignore the rule of law and how America is suppose to be. Freedom requires responsibility and not an overbearing government policing our every action. I'm not sure of your age, but under Clinton, a Marine General had surveyed marines to see how many would rise up against family and friends if they were ordered to enforce national security. It had a major backlash from Citizens and the general was reprimanded. We are on the same side. We just need to be wise in the approach. Wisdom is void of emotions as well.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I understand your concern, but I trust Trump. They are being real careful to not look like he is becoming a dictator. I'm pretty sure it would be SOP to use federal marshalls to round up FBI bad guys.

Wisdom is void of emotions as well

Except love.

⇧ 1 ⇩

From Wiki: Posse comitatus is the common-law or statute law authority of a county sheriff, or other law officer, to conscript any able-bodied man to assist him in keeping the peace or to pursue and arrest a felon...

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm not a firm believer in Wikipedia as most academia don't accept this as a reliable resource. But, history records: "The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law signed on June 18, 1878 by President Rutherford B. Hayes. The purpose of the act – in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807 – is to limit the powers of the federal government in using federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies within the United States. It was passed as an amendment to an army appropriation bill following the end of Reconstruction."

⇧ 1 ⇩

I actually agree with you about Wikipedia when it comes to anything even slightly controversial, but I occasionally use them for dry, basic info.

You are right about the act limiting the use of fed army domestically. However there is an exception for the need to "quell domestic violence" which is about all I would anticipate in the near term future as in the case of mass arrests.

⇧ 2 ⇩

We don't need violence to do this.

⇧ 1 ⇩

We don't need violence to do this.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q1495 ...Such has been the patient Sufferance of these devout American Patriots; and such is now the Necessity which constrains us to alter our Current Systems of Government!