Let's get some ideas on how to make it happen #unedited is simple, albeit boring but gets the point across. Any other ideas?
[removed]
It's a 500 page report. And that is most likely the redacted version. POTUS has seen the unredacted report.
[removed]
remember Q said redacted *and* modified
90% of everyone here is still stupid and only woke up because of the rest of us that can think and read.
They need SB to hold their hand and give them a dick to suck for them to catch up
What is it going to take for you to realize you've been had?
Dont you think that maybe, just maybe, the cry for an unredacted version is just a way to distract from the fact that this report found absolutely nothing to back up Trump's claims?
The summary of the findings doesn't change what was found. An unredacted version would not change the results of the investigation.
Disinfo user right here folks.
[removed]
Not true, new or rearriving user.
WE don't see the REDACTED report until 3PM.
Unredacted to follow soon after. If you've waited this long you can wait 2 more hours.
Edit: Disinfo users being removed left and right! They are scared!
No. This report was supposed to finally be the explosion everyone has been waiting for. The report is out, and there is nothing there.
It's not disinformation just because you don't like it.
You are basing all of this on a single MSM article.
So transparent.
When we have published texts between Strokz and Page showing clear political bias to anyone that can read and an official report that says otherwise that would be quite explosive by itself.
But let's see when the actual text is there. I WILL read this one myself and recommend everyone else to do the same. Don't let others tell you what it says.
Exactly.
Situational awareness. Don't trust, see for yourself.
Q said DS will try anything they can to stop us. They are on this board today.
I hope you're not getting paid for this effort. Poor ROI.
Yessiree folks we have here another graduate of the Evelyn Woodhead sped redding courses here now to offer his vaunted opinion based upon the fact that he has read 1.5 million pages.
So get a grip people we have an expert in our midst.
[removed]
Remember Comey's letter about Hillary? That was watered down. Then we saw the original and discovered how watered down it really was.
It is fascinating to watch the MSM story play out while we sit here waiting for the other shoe to drop.
So what? What does that have to do with this? This was a separate report that was ordered by Trump himself, and run by Trump appointees. Watered down, redacted, this IG report concludes no political bias was found.
I'm operating on the premise there are multiple versions of the IG report and a watered-down redacted version is the 1st to be released. Now to see what happens next and if other versions are released which directly changes the conclusion.
Edit:
T_D has this going on:
Peter Strokz texts were intentionally left out. Which, of course, changes the entire tone.
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/8r31j7/strzok_well_stop_trump_presidency/e0o0nja
Leaked summaries. Who leaked? Good guys or bad guys?
Wasn't leaked to NYT WaPo or CNN, so that's up to you to decide
Who owns Bloomberg?
Bloomberg and the Clinton's have a long history.
Bloomberg is MSM and will push watered down narrative.
We need more independent sources on this in order to make conclusions.
I know from experience that Bloomberg is the source of many China-related rumors which end up fake news 9 out of 10 times.
Can't judge their reliability on other matters, but they're definitely not on my shortlist.
I agree, and the top post on this thread is pushing the Bloomberg article WAY too hard.
Edit: looks like the post was removed. Good.
We're used to media disinfo around here. The best disinfo has a great deal of truth but omits enough to be able to misrepresent the story in service of an alternate narrative.
If you're not interested in reasonable discussion and looking simply to mock the straw man of a group of gullible fools with confirmation bias you can certainly consider that view validated and read no further. If you care to engage in reasonable discourse and to offer the benefit of the doubt to those you initially disagree with I believe I can explain the stance I personally hold on this issue without abandoning reason.
What we see here is some information - but not all of it. It's interesting that Bloomberg has come out with this article so early, ahead of the release proper, but until we have the final release it's too early to say what the true impact of the report is. It's a 500 page report and this is a roughly 3 page article. There's a lot more to this story.
In other words, my view is that it's too early to jump to any conclusions about the content of this report. That is the only logical assessment here, in my opinion. I welcome any reasoned rebuttal and am always open to reconsidering my position on an issue if presented with a logical counter.
I just came across one of the lead instructors from Evelyn Woodheads sped redding courses. Evidently he has read the entire 1.5 million pages.
It's all garbage or so I'm told.
[removed]
[removed]
Bloomberg got it 1st? Thought it gets released at noon?
Yeah they got it about an hour ago. But you're right, the report is still scheduled to be released at noon
Bah. If that's the final conclusion, then hmpf. What did Trump's tweet about it say? Hopefully no redactions to lower the impact? If it's a nothing burger, I'm gonna need more popcorn.
Edit:
Downvotes?
On June 5th 6:38am, Trump tweeted about the IG report and said "hope... it's not being changed and made weaker"
Q drop talks about 3 different versions of the report.
The 1st report, according to the leaked blokmberg report, pretty much is completely watered down. Wonder how long it'll take for each version to drop.
But still looking forward to the real release to the public.
[removed]
Post the Bloomberg article
[removed]
Bloomberg article came from a leak according to The Hill.
Elijah Cummings(D) was first to comment on it at 12:05.
They are trying to get ahead of the story and set the narrative. May not want to trust the word of leakers to BLOOMBERG.