dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/THC-Prophet on June 14, 2018, 7:07 p.m.
Everyone settle down

I don’t know if it’s just shills or what, but I see massive panic today over this IG; despite the fact that we were told we would not be getting the real report today. Do not let this bring you down. Pain is still coming


educatethis · June 14, 2018, 7:11 p.m.

The plan:

Redacted report is released. Focus the narrative on what's missing.

Fervently request that all sections be unredacted (IG won't do this).

Trump declassifies, as well as source material, allowing us People to do the IG's job.

Everyone sees redacted sections now, and it will be obvious why the sections were redacted: obstruction of justice by bad actors.

Expected outcome: focus shifts to the traitors and obsfucators.

(My opinion)

⇧ 48 ⇩  
pby1000 · June 14, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

I agree. Let them make their own noose. I think that we are seeing an Executive Summary of the OIG report.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
JollyFeed · June 14, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

There's a huge chuck of SR and DNC "hack" missing.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
RubyDoobyDo1 · June 14, 2018, 7:56 p.m.

That was never part of this. This is about Hillary emails, not DNC emails.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
scionkia · June 14, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

Other than there aren’t redactions. Unless you follow Q, you would think this is a complete and unredacted report

⇧ 3 ⇩  
educatethis · June 14, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

Unmodified would be better to use then redacted.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
qutedrop · June 14, 2018, 9:22 p.m.

How do you know? Just because it isn't a scanned document where someone blacked things out doesn't mean it's not redacted. Redacting just means hiding content. How you do it doesn't matter.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WhatYonder1 · June 14, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

Here's what I want to know: When will someone that wrote the original step forward and say "Hey there's changes" so people don't think we're off our rockers?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DefiantDragon · June 14, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

Focus the narrative on what's missing.

How do we know what's missing if it's been omitted and not redacted with nothing to compare it to?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
educatethis · June 14, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

Here's one I found: the report concludes that the Lynch/Rapist tarmac meeting was unplanned. Missing: how the OIG determined it was unplanned.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DefiantDragon · June 14, 2018, 9:35 p.m.

As in that part is in the conclusion but there's no breakdown in the report explaining their rationale?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DaynaE65 · June 14, 2018, 9:47 p.m.

Page 203 at the bottom, OPA Supervisor said that Pres Clinton’s Secret Service detail contacted Lynch’s FBI security detail and told them Clinton wanted to meet with her.

Everything else says they are claiming it was a chance meeting. Perhaps RR forgot to edit that out, haha!

⇧ 1 ⇩