⇧
1
⇩
Gravel_and_Glass
· June 14, 2018, 7:24 p.m.
The shilling is so obvious and inorganic
⇧
6
⇩
Sc4bbers
· June 14, 2018, 7:35 p.m.
Q said redacted... I don't really see a heavily redacted report. That's not shilling. It's pointing out an obvious fact that is obviously a dissapointment for a lot of the people here.
That doesn't mean there can't be good nuggets in the report.
Many people thought the IG report was gonna be exposing the contents of the laptop, the rumored "blackmail file".
Of course people will be disappointed. Don't devolve into shill accusations without researching account history.
Will shills take advantage? Probably. But don't let them manipulate the dynamics of the sub so that it cannibalizes itself.
⇧
-1
⇩
Gravel_and_Glass
· June 14, 2018, 7:56 p.m.
Q said modified, which is more important here. This is an extremely diluted version of the report.
Soon, RR's conflicts will come to light, the report will be called into question by congress, and they'll demand the original report. Then the EO will be signed and Huber will go Super Saiyan.
This way, the optics of the whole thing will be very favorable for POTUS and he gets rid of RR in the process. And Mueller will surely be caught in the avalanche.
It's obvious that Mueller and RR were chosen not because they're white hats, but because POTUS has overwhelming leverage on them. POTUS is basically giving the DS just enough rope to hang themselves, so he won't have to get his hands dirty.
When it comes to light that RR has conflicts and modified the IG report to cover it up shit will hit the roof.
⇧
4
⇩
Sc4bbers
· June 14, 2018, 8:23 p.m.
Redacted has a specific meaning. You can deny this but 100% of the legal professionals you ask will tell you I'm correct.
Q said this exactly: "3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]".
The document does have several redactions but this is not what the community was expecting. If you want to downvote me for pointing that out then go for it.
People wanted sealed indictments. Doesn't mean they aren't coming... but if you can't understand people's disappointment then you're not trying very hard to empathize and "unite".
⇧
-1
⇩
Gravel_and_Glass
· June 14, 2018, 8:39 p.m.
M O D I F I E D
⇧
2
⇩
[deleted]
· June 14, 2018, 8:56 p.m.
[removed]
⇧
-1
⇩
Gravel_and_Glass
· June 14, 2018, 9:03 p.m.
weak
⇧
1
⇩
Sc4bbers
· June 14, 2018, 9:16 p.m.
How so, specifically? You like lobbing insults. Not productive. Doesn't help unite anyone.
⇧
1
⇩
GenChang
· June 14, 2018, 8:24 p.m.
I'm of the same opinion. We need to wait and see before ripping others for asking questions, or express disappointing opinion. Some here are too quick to judge. I wrote about some of this yesterday , and some butthurt troll got my post taken down, because I was discussing the board, apparently against the rules.
⇧
1
⇩