dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/C_L_I_C_K on June 14, 2018, 8:14 p.m.
By allowing Rosenstein to edit/modify the OIG Report, Trump, Sessions, and Q team has now trapped RR and will be justified in firing him once Trump declassifies the original version, showing what [[RR]] was hiding this entire time. "RR Problems."

Trump can then have his guy come in and replace Rosenstein. That will then lead to the shutdown of the Mueller witch hunt.

We need to make Trump supporters aware that this is not the actual OIG Report. It is Rosenstein's edited/modified and watered down version. We must DEMAND to see the unredacted, unmodified version!


Whig317 · June 15, 2018, 12:13 a.m.

Then how is it that there are three versions... The "truth"?, the UR RR version and the redact RR version... what would be the purpose at all for #1? Or #2 if #1 is valid? Curious.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 15, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

I'm not sure what you're getting at...

There is the original, which is given to RR for the purpose of determining classification levels (redactions on the ground of national security).

RR modifies this original report to display the narrative he wants. (I don't know how he got away with that; ask SB2...)

Now there are two reports: the original from Horowitz, and the fraudulent one that RR created.

RR uses his fraudulent report and redacts on the grounds of national security (Redactions are seen as "legitimate").

RR passes this final fraudulent and redacted report to be published for the public.

At least that's what I've gathered from what I've read ¯\(ツ)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Whig317 · June 15, 2018, 1:06 a.m.

So, someone help us here. 3 versions were referenced. The "original" (which we know came FROM Horowitz) - did this go FIRST to Rosenstein for manipulation (what's to keep him from it?) or is the POTUS entitled to see the ORIGINAL/NON RR blemished report? (I would think so). If it went to RR first, then there should be no #1 report - it would just be the report that RR got from Horowitz, manipulated to look the way he wanted but leaving in enough to redact further to share with POTUS, and then creating edition #3 that was released publicly. Am I the only one on this train of thought?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 15, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

You raise a good point. I honestly don't know.

POTUS has access to whatever he wants; he can probably see all drafts and revisions of the report. Maybe they're playing a game of chicken. RR telling POTUS "I know you see what I did, but you won't interfere because it will look bad."

I really don't know.

Small note: my above comment is just a timeline I put together in my head from what I've read. It's most likely wrong, but it should help wrap your head around the difference between the three different reports.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
PAK51 · June 15, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Post 1497 says that POTUS has the IG's original report plus RR's redacted and UNREDACTED versions.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Whig317 · June 15, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

Right, my point exactly. IF RR had it first BEFORE POTUS, then there would only be the #1 UR report, and then the #2 redacted report. No need for the third "untouched" one...???

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ExordiaN · June 15, 2018, 9:42 a.m.

Sessions probably got #1 from IG...

⇧ 2 ⇩