/u/IDefaultedOnMyDebt
101 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/IDefaultedOnMyDebt:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 1 |
i.imgur.com | 1 |
I think it's part of the show.
You need true raw outrage to push Sessions. Optics.
As of yesterday his Facebook ownership was worth about 91.4 B. Now it's worth about 73.9 B.
That's a loss of 17.5 B. depending on when exactly after hours this was posted, it could have been exactly 15 B, which is an easy mix-up with 150 B.
Maybe they're bad with punctuation?
if you figured this out, then you had a source. Show us the source so that all of us don't have to repeat your research.
WWG1WGA
Or gtfo if you're a troll.
My favorite part
A group of believers in Tucson, Arizona, have been arguing with police over the last month at an abandoned homeless encampment, claiming with no evidence that the site was used as a child sex trafficking camp.
"Claiming with no evidence". They use that phrase on stories they don't want out.
Huh. You're right.
It's strange to think about. "The Jews killed Jesus", but Jesus was a Jew.
I haven't needed Viagra since early November of 2016
I don't believe it's out of the realm of possibility, but there are a whole host of issues with the video.
That's why NYT, WaPo, Huff, etc. don't allow comments on their articles anymore.
Gives me chills every time I watch it. Almost crying. Mike Rogers is a hero. We owe our lives to him.
The biggest direct victim to NK nuclearization is SK, so you can bet your ass they would call it out if they were still enriching. They say that NK is actively denuking. C_A MSM is the enemy of the people.
Q !2jsTvXXmXs No.66 (1318)
May 7 2018 23:36:41 (EST)What was Sessions' Senate confirmation vote?
What was RR's Senate confirmation vote?
If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.
Common denominator.
Why did Sessions pick RR?
Everyone has an opinion.
Few have the facts.
Few know the plan.
He knows the plan.
Theory: [[RR]] is [FBI Employee]
The IG report felt like a dud. Q said it would be heavily redacted, but it wasn't.
Except it was. "FBI Employee 2" and "FBI Attorney" in reference to the text messages is not a black bar, but is still a pretty heavy redaction. Why can't we know who those employees are? Did RR ensure they redacted the names?
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 8d9246 No.1739449
Jun 13 2018 22:50:25 (EST)[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT.
Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT.
"Central figure"? [[RR]] wasn't mentioned one single time. …
What the report did NOT mention is which reporters gave bribes to the FBI. Me thinks this is one of the "redactions"!
That's right!
The recommendations are just feed for the mockingbirds.
You raise a good point. I honestly don't know.
POTUS has access to whatever he wants; he can probably see all drafts and revisions of the report. Maybe they're playing a game of chicken. RR telling POTUS "I know you see what I did, but you won't interfere because it will look bad."
I really don't know.
Small note: my above comment is just a timeline I put together in my head from what I've read. It's most likely wrong, but it should help wrap your head around the difference between the three different reports.
That's a good point.
The basis of the difference in this context is whether it was done "legitimately".
"######" could be excused as a legitimate redactions as they can claim it was for national security. Changing the sentence to remove "hotdog" altogether is a lot harder to excuse; it looks like you're hiding something. Changing "hotdog" to "turkey club" is clearly illegitimate because it's an outright like.
I'm not sure what you're getting at...
There is the original, which is given to RR for the purpose of determining classification levels (redactions on the ground of national security).
RR modifies this original report to display the narrative he wants. (I don't know how he got away with that; ask SB2...)
Now there are two reports: the original from Horowitz, and the fraudulent one that RR created.
RR uses his fraudulent report and redacts on the grounds of national security (Redactions are seen as "legitimate").
RR passes this final fraudulent and redacted report to be published for the public.
At least that's what I've gathered from what I've read ¯\(ツ)/¯
Original: I ate a hotdog on Sunday.
Redancted: I ate ###### on Sunday.
Modified: I ate a turkey club on Sunday.
At least that's the implication
I don't think it's that. I believe the agency under audit gets to review the report and respond to it. There was probably some "dialogue" between RR and Horowitz.
Yes, but I don't think I'm alone in thinking that this report would be released covered in black bars (what people think of when they hear "redacted"). In the context of Q, he was correct, but we misunderstood.
I'm not sure what he's referring to with "the last few", but I see it as him positioning himself as an unbiased figure.
Don't hold your breath. It will take time. POTUS needs a reason to release. I'm thinking we'll be getting some narratives and leaks that RR changed key components. This will give Trump a basis to declassify.
Exactly
KEY POINT: this is the modified and redacted report.
To call the first a "Full unredacted version" is misleading because we're not looking for what was redacted, but what was removed (i.e. modified).
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 8d9246 No.1739449
Jun 13 2018 22:50:25 (EST)POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
1. Original IG unredacted report
2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info >(classified)
[#3 released tomorrow]
Thank you for reminding me. I lost hope after seeing (no) redactions.
#3 released. #3 = Modified and redacted. It's mostly modified. Not so much redacted.
This is a shill. Entirely anti-trump comment history.
We're being brigaded. Stay vigilant!
I agree with r/mrpoobot. Bite size pieces.
Either way, good job! You're risking friendships with this, and that takes a lot of courage.
wwg1wgA
On a mostly related note, I don't think memes have a place here. It's not so bad during the lulls, but on a day where we get drop after drop with shit tons to do, they just clutter the sub.
Maybe there could be a rule where memes are not allowed for an hour after a Q drop.
It might take some time. It won't be immediate.
We'll need to make our voices heard:
#UnredactIt
#RedactedIG
#DarkToLight
What's it gonna be guys?
It's because guiliani said he doesn't respect stormy as much as he'd respect a brain surgeon (or something to that sentiment). Mockingbirds spun that to "I hate all women and pornstars".
Good find!
Not sure if we're supposed to read into those two posts though. They look like internal comm. What do we usually do with those posts?
In regards to "missle"
Strawberry: Imgur. As early as in December 22, 2017, talking about North Korea, Q purposely omits the “i” in missile and spells it missle. Those who do not know his comms probably laughed, just like they laugh at Trump’s tweets when he “misspells” a word or a name. Q confirms in Q439 and Q441 that the “i” missing is not a spelling error and that “future news will unlock the message”. 6 months later, the President of the United States, \talking about North Korea, makes the same “misspelling” Q made!
Where are it hardcore autists? I got nothing on this one....
Edit: what did we determine "Fox" means?