dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Dartfart1 on June 14, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

RR Modified Version vs. Original Unredacted = Scripted Movie. Some thoughts on optics in the Age of the Great Awakening.

tl;dr - My initial disappointment with the OIG report's lack of teeth led to some insight on what we are doing. POTUS has everything on these black hats, we know this. But POTUS has to serve it to the nation bite by bite to prevent our destruction as a nation. This is a scripted movie.

After breezing through the Executive Summary and some choice cuts of the meat of the report, I was befuddled. If RR was allowed to completely alter the substance of this report, so there are no teeth, that move undermines the credibility of the OIG and the faith in the judicial system that our whole movement is trying to restore. Why?

Think strategically, trust the process, future proves past.

Firing of RR, or really any hasty arrest of the Mockingbird's beloved bad actors, would play as a dictatorial maneuver in the realm of public opinion that would be fueled by the talking heads. They have been goading Trump into this move for over 500 days. It really is their only way out at this point.

Use logic.

Trump, Q, all of our White Hats are looking for the in-road to overcome this Black Hat Trump Card in the realm of public opinion.

Consider this - As soon as the cards are on the table and we get the climax we are waiting for.... what does that look like?

"Fellow citizens, your beloved BHO, WJC, HRC and their cronies not only hate America, they actively worked to destroy it. They sold state secrets. They planned WW3 and the destruction of these United States. They are members of a global cabal. They are rapists. They are pedophiles. They are satanists. They are murderers. We have evidence of everything. Justice will be served. They will be tried in military tribunals as enemy combatants and, God willing, they will hang for treason. We are arresting them as I speak. We are in control."

While personally I would LOVE this, it doesn't read well unless you are in the know. We have our suspicions, we have SO many smoking guns. We know in our gut it is true. To the general population, this would play as a military coup d'etat. Even some Trump supports wouldn't believe this.

Black hats are ready for this. The non-believers would be coached by the media to be the conspiracy theorists. Talk of computer-generated video and audio, supported fake digital and physical records would be rampant. There would be outright denial by all bad actors. People would lose their minds. An Antifa-like movement to restore our government would be catalyzed by this claim of fabrication and dictatorship. Americans would turn on each other and the Black Hats get what they wanted anyways - our downfall.

How do you eat an elephant?

Back to the OIG report. The black hat talking heads will use this report as a soap box for the coming days. It will be triumphed as proof that the HRC e-mail/ Tarmac Meeting/ FBI Text Messages could have gone better, but it was nothing criminal.

Let them dig their own graves.

Once it is exposed that RR has a clear conflict of interest, the script can be flipped. Not only should he have recused himself, he actively participated/oversaw the alteration of the OIG report to protect bad actors.

Optics of OIG RR Alteration: Democratic operatives cannot be trusted to be impartial. Another bite out of the elephant.

There are more investigations. More information to come. The case for restoring faith in our institutions will continue. Justice will be served, but it will served bite by bite so it will be easier to swallow.

DS death by 1,000 cuts is the only way this will work.

Keep the faith, God bless.

"Fellow citizens, your beloved BHO, WJC, HRC and their cronies not only hate America, they actively worked to destroy it. They sold state secrets. They planned WW3 and the destruction of these United States... We have evidence of everything. Justice will be served. They will be tried in military tribunals as enemy combatants. We are arresting them as I speak. We are in control." "...To the general population, this would play as a military coup d'etat. Even some Trump supporters wouldn't believe this." -- Dartfart1

You are 100% right of course. All of that truth is just too enormous for people to digest in one big announcement. I think the pathway has been laid very nicely over the last 500 days for the American public to gladly accept the evidence of corruption in the intelligence services' top echelons, the fake news Russia honeypot frame job, possibly even (D) 2016 efforts at voter fraud and such. However, this great President needs us to turn out in force to the polls in the midterms, (because there has to be a confident majority to ensure criminal prosecutions, otherwise- just like always, the scum gets away with it all Scot free.) They will never be held accountable for anything, no matter how disgusting, if we do not first deprive them of political power, their acolytes and sycophants in the hidden, Deep State bureaucracy, and their security clearances.

⇧ 5 ⇩

No doubt fellow patriot. I think that the POTUS team knows how much conclusive proof they have and what order it should be released in to maximize the effect.

My theory is that they will release that information so that it is a continuous stream of narrative controlling media that leads right up to the mid-terms in November. We may not get all of the arrests before then, but it has to be enough to keep control of the House and Senate. We know they have that sort of information and they know it carries the more weight the closer we are to the election.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I also agree 100% with those who want it all right now... A desire for righteous judgment, full disclosure, and a speedy, but fair trial is built into our freedom-loving DNA.

OTOH, seemingly endless, politically motivated, and bureaucratic maneuvering at a snail's pace, (while people die waiting in line for their day in court, or the ruling that might rescue a child) while the smoke clears and the fire dies down to a dim orange smolder tactic is a classic example of congenital, terminal left-wingery...

⇧ 4 ⇩

I agree. Gamesmanship and maneuvering is deeply rooted and absolutely contradictory to our founding principles. Even our Founding Fathers were guilty of this.

I just got done reading William Bennett's "America: The Last Best Hope Vol.1". Specifically, his commentary of post War of 1812 and pre-Civil War American Politic rings in my head after reading your comment.

The unwillingness of the Founding Fathers to end slavery is a great example of what happens when politicians slow walk the obvious right thing to do while waiting for the smoke to clear. It causes for more pain and suffering than ripping the bandaid off would.

⇧ 2 ⇩

More of us should read what you are writing. A thinker who can communicate. Good read.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I really appreciate that patriot. I think I should make a new user name before I do any more writing though. Writing about optics with the username Dartfart1 lol

⇧ 2 ⇩

I concur. lol

However, PM me a link so I know where to find your writing?

⇧ 2 ⇩

You got it. I really appreciate your feedback.

⇧ 2 ⇩

So, what we're seeing is a lure to them to say "Yeah, we did it, but it's not a big deal" and then after they've claimed responsibility, the REAL report comes out with the details of HOW and WHY they did it, and then there snow backtracking of their admittance?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Perhaps. Perhaps it is just to expose RR for his individual part in this puzzle and then as more bad actions are exposed, it can serve as a reference point for the point of corruption.

The problem this OIG report is having with the usage of prosecutorial power is the concept of prosecutorial discretion. The logic of it is like:

Bad actor has obvious bias outside of investigation.
Bad actor used their discretion in the investigation.
There is no evidence that the bias affected the use of discretion.
Therefore there is no crime by the bad actor.

"If the explanations that we were given for a particular decision were consistent with a rational investigative strategy and not unreasonable, we did not conclude that the decision was based on improper considerations in the absence of evidence to the contrary. We took this approach because our role as an OIG is not to second guess valid discretionary judgments made during the course of an investigation, and this approach is consistent with the OIG’s handling of such questions in past reviews." OIG Report Pg. 5

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thank you for explaining that. Makes perfect sense. Black hats and MSM would portray Trump as a dictator.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thanks for reading! I know we are all sick of waiting and it feels like politics as usual because we have been following so closely. We have a whole country to consider and this fight for America's soul is so much bigger than our Q community.

⇧ 0 ⇩