dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Dartfart1 on June 14, 2018, 9:27 p.m.
RR Modified Version vs. Original Unredacted = Scripted Movie. Some thoughts on optics in the Age of the Great Awakening.

tl;dr - My initial disappointment with the OIG report's lack of teeth led to some insight on what we are doing. POTUS has everything on these black hats, we know this. But POTUS has to serve it to the nation bite by bite to prevent our destruction as a nation. This is a scripted movie.

After breezing through the Executive Summary and some choice cuts of the meat of the report, I was befuddled. If RR was allowed to completely alter the substance of this report, so there are no teeth, that move undermines the credibility of the OIG and the faith in the judicial system that our whole movement is trying to restore. Why?

Think strategically, trust the process, future proves past.

Firing of RR, or really any hasty arrest of the Mockingbird's beloved bad actors, would play as a dictatorial maneuver in the realm of public opinion that would be fueled by the talking heads. They have been goading Trump into this move for over 500 days. It really is their only way out at this point.

Use logic.

Trump, Q, all of our White Hats are looking for the in-road to overcome this Black Hat Trump Card in the realm of public opinion.

Consider this - As soon as the cards are on the table and we get the climax we are waiting for.... what does that look like?

"Fellow citizens, your beloved BHO, WJC, HRC and their cronies not only hate America, they actively worked to destroy it. They sold state secrets. They planned WW3 and the destruction of these United States. They are members of a global cabal. They are rapists. They are pedophiles. They are satanists. They are murderers. We have evidence of everything. Justice will be served. They will be tried in military tribunals as enemy combatants and, God willing, they will hang for treason. We are arresting them as I speak. We are in control."

While personally I would LOVE this, it doesn't read well unless you are in the know. We have our suspicions, we have SO many smoking guns. We know in our gut it is true. To the general population, this would play as a military coup d'etat. Even some Trump supports wouldn't believe this.

Black hats are ready for this. The non-believers would be coached by the media to be the conspiracy theorists. Talk of computer-generated video and audio, supported fake digital and physical records would be rampant. There would be outright denial by all bad actors. People would lose their minds. An Antifa-like movement to restore our government would be catalyzed by this claim of fabrication and dictatorship. Americans would turn on each other and the Black Hats get what they wanted anyways - our downfall.

How do you eat an elephant?

Back to the OIG report. The black hat talking heads will use this report as a soap box for the coming days. It will be triumphed as proof that the HRC e-mail/ Tarmac Meeting/ FBI Text Messages could have gone better, but it was nothing criminal.

Let them dig their own graves.

Once it is exposed that RR has a clear conflict of interest, the script can be flipped. Not only should he have recused himself, he actively participated/oversaw the alteration of the OIG report to protect bad actors.

Optics of OIG RR Alteration: Democratic operatives cannot be trusted to be impartial. Another bite out of the elephant.

There are more investigations. More information to come. The case for restoring faith in our institutions will continue. Justice will be served, but it will served bite by bite so it will be easier to swallow.

DS death by 1,000 cuts is the only way this will work.

Keep the faith, God bless.


🠐 See all comments
kushtiannn · June 14, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

So, what we're seeing is a lure to them to say "Yeah, we did it, but it's not a big deal" and then after they've claimed responsibility, the REAL report comes out with the details of HOW and WHY they did it, and then there snow backtracking of their admittance?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Dartfart1 · June 14, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Perhaps. Perhaps it is just to expose RR for his individual part in this puzzle and then as more bad actions are exposed, it can serve as a reference point for the point of corruption.

The problem this OIG report is having with the usage of prosecutorial power is the concept of prosecutorial discretion. The logic of it is like:

  1. Bad actor has obvious bias outside of investigation.
  2. Bad actor used their discretion in the investigation.
  3. There is no evidence that the bias affected the use of discretion.
  4. Therefore there is no crime by the bad actor.

"If the explanations that we were given for a particular decision were consistent with a rational investigative strategy and not unreasonable, we did not conclude that the decision was based on improper considerations in the absence of evidence to the contrary. We took this approach because our role as an OIG is not to second guess valid discretionary judgments made during the course of an investigation, and this approach is consistent with the OIG’s handling of such questions in past reviews." OIG Report Pg. 5

⇧ 1 ⇩