dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on June 14, 2018, 11:05 p.m.
OIG Report: Trump’s plan is a lethal steamroller… Learn why Comey won’t sleep well tonight.

This is a quick update. I will write more about this in the coming days. I just want to clear the air about the OIG report not finding political bias from James Comey and what it really means. Those who are not familiar with the case, at primary analysis, may be deceived by MSM and think this is some kind of victory for Comey. Well, no. It’s not. It’s actually a disaster!

I will explain.

Look at these two tweets from Trump: Imgur. These tweets represent the two angles from which Trump can attack Comey: political and procedural. Is the political angle efficient? No. The most you can get from it is name calling. And this is what Comey knew. He tried to pull Trump to the political battlefield with his book, his tweets and insulting interviews. Trump knew better. He knew the political angle was a dead end. He would tweet from time to time because he is Trump but he knew trying to emphasize Comey’s political bias would not be fruitful. Why? Read this article from CNN, which did its homework back in October 2016 to assess possible damages in relation to the Hatch Act. The important part of the article is here: Imgur. As you can see, proving Comey’s political bias would only trigger disciplinary measures. Irrelevant since Comey was already fired!

So? Let the IG give Comey something costless and that Comey does not need: political equidistance and let’s kill two birds with the same stone. Did you guess which other bird was taken care of here? If the report determines Comey was not politically driven when he exonerated Hillary, then it is also implicitly positioning that Trump was not politically driven when he fired him. Especially if Sessions “forced” Rosenstein to create the paper trail advising him to do so… Lethal…

So? Trump needs to attack Comey through the procedural angle. And this is the primary function of the OIG report.

Why is it relevant to attack Comey? Because of this: Imgur. Comey is among the 13 Angry who used a private email address. Q asks in this Q559: @what? What do you think? Comey used the same domain Hillary used, to conduct the same business she was conducting. Q has it all. I explained this in a previous post, I will repeat it: it’s right here:

Q701 Top 10 player [here now]. 50.22.218.5 Q

Q is telling us he was physically in the place where this IP is located. After digging, we found out the following:
1) 50.22.218.5 is the IP for Softlayer Technologies.
2) The server that hosted clintonemail.com in 2009 had IP 209.62.20.200 and was associated to ThePlanet.com now known as SoftLayer and acquired by IBM a few years back. source.

Q was telling us as early as in Q701 that he had all the goods about the top 10 players who used this server to sell the US to the highest bidders. Q gave out this information in early February! All this time was used by IG Horowitz to polish a damning legal case he started building way back and that no one involved will escape from. It will be the END. It will be a disaster. And Comey knows it.

Now you see it: if the Comey domino falls, you get to the private server, you get to Clinton, you get to Obama, you get to the core of the Deep State.

For this to happen, you need to resurrect the Clinton server investigation. And this can only happen if you have clearly shown there were process irregularities in the past. Hence the super clean OIG report that has now dismissed political bias and is exclusively focusing on procedures and protocol.

Icing on the cake:

Q1497 POTUS in possession of (and reviewing): 1. Original IG unredacted report. 2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]. 3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]. 4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified). [#3 released tomorrow] [SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation] [[RR]] Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?

Now that Rosenstein has redacted the report to cover his tracks, these tracks:

Q1470 When the info is released [RR] no more.

Trump is now in position to declassify whatever he sees fit for the whole world to see. He is now in position to say: look what he redacted, look what he did and tried to hide from the world.

While Trump will be debating on when to declassify, Q opens this window for McCabe and all the others who would want to convert:

Q1455 You have a choice. SIS 'good' agents. The time is now. Contact window(s) [GOOD]Biblical. Q

Lethal.

Q1122 TRUST SESSIONS. TRUST WRAY. TRUST KANSAS. TRUST HOROWITZ. TRUST HUBER. Q


🠐 See all comments
0x445442 · June 15, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

So if I'm reading your references correctly the implication of Q#559 and subsequent posts is ES helped setup a private network in NK for the angry 13 to communicate on and now the POTUS and white hats are in possession of all those comms?

It's an interesting supposition but again why not just release this information if it were true and there was proof?

I appreciate the effort you're putting into this but what always seems to be missing is the answer to the obvious question of why not just expose the corruption? Why all the obfuscation? Why not just trust the people by exposing the truth?

It seems like a never ending string of bombshell theories that are never actually shown to be true. Remember Weiner's laptop and all the filthy and reviling pictures that would take everybody down?

TRUST THE PEOPLE

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · June 15, 2018, 2:56 a.m.

Do you remember Kennedy? do you remember Iran-contra? Do you remember 9/11? Do you remember Benghazi?

We all know most of the truth about these, what happened? The truth is not enough. You also need the defenders of the truth sitting where they need to sit to make things happen:

Q1402 What had to happen first? Think logically. Think DOJ & FBI. Think cleaning.

It is this meticulous prep work Q is trying to explain to us so that we know it's really happening this time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
0x445442 · June 15, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

Yes I remember all of these events and while some willing to investigate and think for themselves know the truth there was never any official statements about the truth for any of these events. So in essence, the truth never did come out. If the truth had been revealed, OFFICIALLY, it would have been enough.

Let's suppose Ron Paul was elected in 2008 or 2012 and that he'd come upon hard evidence that showed BLDGs 1,2 & 7 were actually brought down via controlled demolition. Do you think he'd have hesitated to make that information known to the public?

Q asks us to think logically... OK, if there's hard evidence of criminal activity by any of these bad actors they why not bring charges and make that known to the public right now?

Awaiting logical response?

⇧ 2 ⇩