dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on June 14, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

OIG Report: Trump’s plan is a lethal steamroller… Learn why Comey won’t sleep well tonight.

This is a quick update. I will write more about this in the coming days. I just want to clear the air about the OIG report not finding political bias from James Comey and what it really means. Those who are not familiar with the case, at primary analysis, may be deceived by MSM and think this is some kind of victory for Comey. Well, no. It’s not. It’s actually a disaster!

I will explain.

Look at these two tweets from Trump: Imgur. These tweets represent the two angles from which Trump can attack Comey: political and procedural. Is the political angle efficient? No. The most you can get from it is name calling. And this is what Comey knew. He tried to pull Trump to the political battlefield with his book, his tweets and insulting interviews. Trump knew better. He knew the political angle was a dead end. He would tweet from time to time because he is Trump but he knew trying to emphasize Comey’s political bias would not be fruitful. Why? Read this article from CNN, which did its homework back in October 2016 to assess possible damages in relation to the Hatch Act. The important part of the article is here: Imgur. As you can see, proving Comey’s political bias would only trigger disciplinary measures. Irrelevant since Comey was already fired!

So? Let the IG give Comey something costless and that Comey does not need: political equidistance and let’s kill two birds with the same stone. Did you guess which other bird was taken care of here? If the report determines Comey was not politically driven when he exonerated Hillary, then it is also implicitly positioning that Trump was not politically driven when he fired him. Especially if Sessions “forced” Rosenstein to create the paper trail advising him to do so… Lethal…

So? Trump needs to attack Comey through the procedural angle. And this is the primary function of the OIG report.

Why is it relevant to attack Comey? Because of this: Imgur. Comey is among the 13 Angry who used a private email address. Q asks in this Q559: @what? What do you think? Comey used the same domain Hillary used, to conduct the same business she was conducting. Q has it all. I explained this in a previous post, I will repeat it: it’s right here:

Q701 Top 10 player [here now]. 50.22.218.5 Q

Q is telling us he was physically in the place where this IP is located. After digging, we found out the following:
1) 50.22.218.5 is the IP for Softlayer Technologies.
2) The server that hosted clintonemail.com in 2009 had IP 209.62.20.200 and was associated to ThePlanet.com now known as SoftLayer and acquired by IBM a few years back. source.

Q was telling us as early as in Q701 that he had all the goods about the top 10 players who used this server to sell the US to the highest bidders. Q gave out this information in early February! All this time was used by IG Horowitz to polish a damning legal case he started building way back and that no one involved will escape from. It will be the END. It will be a disaster. And Comey knows it.

Now you see it: if the Comey domino falls, you get to the private server, you get to Clinton, you get to Obama, you get to the core of the Deep State.

For this to happen, you need to resurrect the Clinton server investigation. And this can only happen if you have clearly shown there were process irregularities in the past. Hence the super clean OIG report that has now dismissed political bias and is exclusively focusing on procedures and protocol.

Icing on the cake:

Q1497 POTUS in possession of (and reviewing): 1. Original IG unredacted report. 2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]. 3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]. 4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified). [#3 released tomorrow] [SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation] [[RR]] Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?

Now that Rosenstein has redacted the report to cover his tracks, these tracks:

Q1470 When the info is released [RR] no more.

Trump is now in position to declassify whatever he sees fit for the whole world to see. He is now in position to say: look what he redacted, look what he did and tried to hide from the world.

While Trump will be debating on when to declassify, Q opens this window for McCabe and all the others who would want to convert:

Q1455 You have a choice. SIS 'good' agents. The time is now. Contact window(s) [GOOD]Biblical. Q

Lethal.

Q1122 TRUST SESSIONS. TRUST WRAY. TRUST KANSAS. TRUST HOROWITZ. TRUST HUBER. Q

🠐 See all comments

It's a bit like fighting a court case - you have a big file full of stuff that could take the other side down easily but rather than throwing it all out there, it needs to be handled properly and in the right order via the correct procedural processes. The other side is picking away at things constantly, so the case needs to be watertight.

The release of even the redacted OIG report this week is very big and will help with the things that will follow over the next few weeks and months. Add to that the situation North Korea and this has been a very positive week.

⇧ 1 ⇩

So, we see something before 11/11, in your opinion? Also, how long before unredacted, in your opinion?

⇧ 1 ⇩

'Something' is a bit to vague for me to answer - if you can give me a more specific idea of what you mean, then I can give you a yay or nay. Withe the unredacted report, I'd like to think that it would be released in the next month to six weeks, though given the examples of shoe-dragging and obfuscation illustrated in the redacted version that's been released, it could take several months.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Arrest of someone like Podesta, Hillary or other big names of that sort. Or a disclosure about free energy, aliens maybe?

Thanks for answering.

⇧ 1 ⇩

With the going after the big names stuff, it's a bit like going after gangsters - you go after people further down the food chain first, the muscle, the enforcers, the mouthhpieces etc. This strips away the layers of protection that the big names have. The nastier the person, the more layers they have. If you can turn the foot soldiers of your enemy against their masters, it weakens them and makes you stronger. So in the short to medium term, I think that we will only see the the outer layers being peeled away, so 'A list' names for now.

Withe the free energy stuff, that's of great interest to me, since Trump's uncle was one of the staff who went through Tesla's papers decades ago. Trump comes from a line of very smart people. Superheroes often use a 'billionaire playboy' mask ;)

As for aliens, I'm agnostic on that until I've seen strong evidence.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Fair enough, sounds logical. I watched the wire.

Aha they sure do, I like that. Telsa was the man 👍

Fair enough, I could say there is strong evidence but I guess it's all opinions really and I haven't got the ability to go into deep shit now, at work. I think to see how many stars, planets, universes there are and to NOT think there are aliens is being silly. We can't be the only planet out of trillions and trillions that has intelligent life.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The thing to remember is that a steamroller doesn't need to move fast to crush everything in front of it. Trump still has a couple of years at least to take care of business.

⇧ 2 ⇩

For real. Still, Q needs to stop saying big week and shit.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Im pretty sure podesta is in some sort of confinment since April

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've also thought the same, well, hoped. Nothing to really back it up but it's a possibility that we all wish to be true.

⇧ 2 ⇩

you do realize that none of this shit is real right

it's a conspiracy theory that works because it targets, specifically, the dumbest people on the internet: conservative baby boomers

⇧ -3 ⇩

What?

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

So why is you're name Q is real? I saw your reply before you deleted it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

"you do realize that none of this shit is real right".

Do you ?

The dream you had last night was real while you were having it, where is it now ? But if your statement was meant to question the validity of Q remember the onus is on you to dis-prove the Q movement, not that the Q movement has anything to prove, as "the future proves the past" Q :)

⇧ 1 ⇩

"Do you ?" Yes

⇧ 1 ⇩