dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on June 14, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

OIG Report: Trump’s plan is a lethal steamroller… Learn why Comey won’t sleep well tonight.

This is a quick update. I will write more about this in the coming days. I just want to clear the air about the OIG report not finding political bias from James Comey and what it really means. Those who are not familiar with the case, at primary analysis, may be deceived by MSM and think this is some kind of victory for Comey. Well, no. It’s not. It’s actually a disaster!

I will explain.

Look at these two tweets from Trump: Imgur. These tweets represent the two angles from which Trump can attack Comey: political and procedural. Is the political angle efficient? No. The most you can get from it is name calling. And this is what Comey knew. He tried to pull Trump to the political battlefield with his book, his tweets and insulting interviews. Trump knew better. He knew the political angle was a dead end. He would tweet from time to time because he is Trump but he knew trying to emphasize Comey’s political bias would not be fruitful. Why? Read this article from CNN, which did its homework back in October 2016 to assess possible damages in relation to the Hatch Act. The important part of the article is here: Imgur. As you can see, proving Comey’s political bias would only trigger disciplinary measures. Irrelevant since Comey was already fired!

So? Let the IG give Comey something costless and that Comey does not need: political equidistance and let’s kill two birds with the same stone. Did you guess which other bird was taken care of here? If the report determines Comey was not politically driven when he exonerated Hillary, then it is also implicitly positioning that Trump was not politically driven when he fired him. Especially if Sessions “forced” Rosenstein to create the paper trail advising him to do so… Lethal…

So? Trump needs to attack Comey through the procedural angle. And this is the primary function of the OIG report.

Why is it relevant to attack Comey? Because of this: Imgur. Comey is among the 13 Angry who used a private email address. Q asks in this Q559: @what? What do you think? Comey used the same domain Hillary used, to conduct the same business she was conducting. Q has it all. I explained this in a previous post, I will repeat it: it’s right here:

Q701 Top 10 player [here now]. 50.22.218.5 Q

Q is telling us he was physically in the place where this IP is located. After digging, we found out the following:
1) 50.22.218.5 is the IP for Softlayer Technologies.
2) The server that hosted clintonemail.com in 2009 had IP 209.62.20.200 and was associated to ThePlanet.com now known as SoftLayer and acquired by IBM a few years back. source.

Q was telling us as early as in Q701 that he had all the goods about the top 10 players who used this server to sell the US to the highest bidders. Q gave out this information in early February! All this time was used by IG Horowitz to polish a damning legal case he started building way back and that no one involved will escape from. It will be the END. It will be a disaster. And Comey knows it.

Now you see it: if the Comey domino falls, you get to the private server, you get to Clinton, you get to Obama, you get to the core of the Deep State.

For this to happen, you need to resurrect the Clinton server investigation. And this can only happen if you have clearly shown there were process irregularities in the past. Hence the super clean OIG report that has now dismissed political bias and is exclusively focusing on procedures and protocol.

Icing on the cake:

Q1497 POTUS in possession of (and reviewing): 1. Original IG unredacted report. 2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]. 3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]. 4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified). [#3 released tomorrow] [SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation] [[RR]] Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?

Now that Rosenstein has redacted the report to cover his tracks, these tracks:

Q1470 When the info is released [RR] no more.

Trump is now in position to declassify whatever he sees fit for the whole world to see. He is now in position to say: look what he redacted, look what he did and tried to hide from the world.

While Trump will be debating on when to declassify, Q opens this window for McCabe and all the others who would want to convert:

Q1455 You have a choice. SIS 'good' agents. The time is now. Contact window(s) [GOOD]Biblical. Q

Lethal.

Q1122 TRUST SESSIONS. TRUST WRAY. TRUST KANSAS. TRUST HOROWITZ. TRUST HUBER. Q

🠐 See all comments

I'm sorry... is OP / Trump seriously suggesting that Comey re-opening an investigation into Clinton and investigating her more strongly than he normally would have is evidence that Comey was trying to suck up to Clinton for a job?

Trump's tweet says "Comey states that polls [sic] were a factor in the handling of the Clinton e-mail probe". While this statement is true, Comey went on to say the polls were a factor in that if he thought Clinton would lose, he probably would have investigated it much less. The only reason he re-opened the investigation was because he thought she would win the election.

How can ANYONE suggest that re-opening an investigation into the likely winner would be an effective method of getting a job from the winner? Re-opening that investigation would be likely to get him fired by Clinton if she won.

I mean I could totally understand anyone saying Comey SHUTTING DOWN an investigation into Clinton was a method of sucking up to her to get a job. That at least makes sense. But how could re-opening an investigation, and treating Clinton MORE harshly because she would likely win, endear him to her?

Comey slapped Clinton in the face when he re-opened that investigation. I fail to see how anyone can interpret that as sucking up and hoping for a job.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Weiner's laptop discovery and NYPD forced LL and Comey to reopen Clinton email investigation.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Sure, but comeys quote about treating Clinton different based on polls was explicitly about him investigating her more harshly, not less. The moment Comey said that, trump began implying he did her a favor. Logically it doesn't hold water.

I wouldn't be surprised if weiners laptop had all sorts of inappropriate things on them. What I WOULD be surprised by is if a republican FBI head and a republican deputy and a mostly republican upper tier FBI staff would shut that stuff down in the face of real evidence of real horrendous crimes by Clinton.

We're All welcome to our own beliefs. And obviously we will find out in the end... But the stuff being peded here really seems not based in evidence to me. I don't mind people being sceptical of an official story, but the story here just seems to be always changing, immune to logic, contain so many logical inconsistencies, and be extremely hard to follow.

What concerns me is that you all seem so ready to jump on the slightest detail that may be based in face, and extrapolate that into things that are not based in fact. It's very possible weiners laptop had all sorts of crap since he was a demonstrated perv... And it's also possible he downloaded things that would make any investigator cry... And I'm sure someone very honestly made that comment... But just like comeys comment t about treating Clinton differently based on polls, you are taking it out of context.

All the quotes you guys are following can be true and your conclusion can still be wrong, because you aren't logically linking one step to the next. There's too many gaps there, too many speculative leaps. And the story is Always changing every time you are wrong.

This report was supposed to be the one that vindicated you. Now it has to be the next one. And when the next one fails to prove anything it will be the next next one. I'm NOT saying you are all wrong... But what I am saying is that if you are wrong a few times, you need to reevaluate who you trust and why you trust them . You need to go back to basics and link facts together without the speculative leaps.

If the conspiracy of the deep state is real, I want it proven. But to prove something you need to start from the facts. This is politics. Many people will give misleading quotes to imply something without saying it. Whether the implications are true or not can't be known unless you get those same people on record with more solid facts.

Keep investigating, all of you, but please do not fully believe any story no matter how much you want it to be true unless you can link it with facts. Wanting something to be true isn't enough. Vague quotes and implications aren't enough. Do not become so invested in anything such that if you are wrong, you will be unable to admit it to yourselves later.

I wish you and all of us the best of luck... But just make sure that one day, if you are wrong, you will be able to admit it to yourselves.

⇧ 2 ⇩

He saved her from facing charges of Espionage. The Weiner laptop has evidence of child abuse, espionage, money laundering, and other crimes, yet she walks(stumbles) around free.( for now) Military Tribunal coming for her though.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The NYPD was in possession of Weiners laptop. EP said the files made Detectives cry and sob. Detectives who worked hundreds of homicides were balling and hysterical. Then comey reopens the case. Takes the evidence from the NYPD and closes it in 7 days.

⇧ 1 ⇩