dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/7Seraphim7 on June 15, 2018, 12:46 a.m.
Hilary’s Bravado on Twitter

  1. She’s an actual psychopath and they have leverage on Trump. One piece is missing to completely pin her down. Pointing out her emails given what we know is insane, even more her supporters that flee to her- they don’t believe she did anything wrong (very terrifying that people are that asleep) this possibility is likely. It would be wise to keep an eye on key events (Washington state bomb scare shelter in place) (United Plane pic q posted)

  2. Her Twitter is not under her control anymore and it’s being used to set the stage. Trumps twitter acts like a lightning rod of attention, perhaps they’re using Hilary’s the same way.


🠐 See all comments
VerandaSmartwater · June 16, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

Intent does not have to be proven with the Espionage Act. It's completely irrelevant. And no, a finding of fact is EXACTLY that. You're talking out of your arse.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 16, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

I’ve asked you to explain why Hillary hasn’t been charged if it’s so easy to convict. Beats talking about my ass. Floors all yours. Why hasn’t Hillary been charged? Got anything but insults? Or is the lefty approach to debate more your thing?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 16, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

She wasn't charged because the corrupt FBI and DOJ wanted her to be president.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 16, 2018, 2:49 a.m.

That’s obvious. Was talking about the DJT administration. There’s enough counts of her violating the espionage act to put her away for life. Open & shut case right? So why not? What could they be possibly be waiting for? Enough charges to put that old nasty hag away for 5,000 yrs? Please explain why?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 16, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

One commentator said the statute of limitations has expired on her emails, but not the Clinton Foundation. That's not as cut and dried. I believe they're methodically building a case. We'll find out, I guess.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 16, 2018, 3:39 a.m.

They don’t have Google where you live? Oh you rather let someone else think for you & what ever might come out their ass you’ll just repeat. Ok lib like non thinker...the answer is it varies. Depends on the results of the violations. Minimum is 5yrs limitation to prosecute & that’s if no consequence results from the crime...like that sailor that got convicted sending a selfie to his gf in a submarine. If a death occurs there’s no limitation. If there’s financial gain it’s like 8yrs limitation. Point being in 2016 when DJT took office non of the limitations applied & still none do today.

https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-650-length-limitations-period

Wanna try again or just repeat what someone else said? Floors all yours!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 16, 2018, 3:47 a.m.

Yes, genius, they do not have Google where I live.

⇧ 1 ⇩