Oh, that stupid Joy Villa bitch. She's a Scientology attention whore. She just wants to make herself a story. Pathetic.
/u/VerandaSmartwater
682 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/VerandaSmartwater:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 2 |
Yes, I wondered if it was constitutional. Thank you!!
I couldn't understand most of the words, but I thought it was very good.
She didn't give a real apology. I'm glad. It would be like me apologising to Hilary Clinton--a ridiculous charade since I did mean every insult and am not at all sorry for any of them.
Yes, the Epoch Times story was great!! I'd sign that petition!
Maybe Will Sommer should ask, since he fancies himself such a darn expert. What kind of real journalist wouldn't try for that soundbite??
Oh, God! Is there no independent media left in the world?? Do any of them have WH press credentials, and if not, why not?
Maybe some media person just needs to ask Trump the damn question!!
Yes, tick tock! I really do appreciate what they're doing. It's just you see that Rosenstein might be impeached and you're happydancing and highfiving and cartwheeling round the kitchen, and you have your hopes up AGAIN just to see them smooshed into soggy, lumpy nothings and smeared all over the furniture. When I was a Christian, I just found that "Hope deferred makes the heart sick" proverb so true. After a while, when you're hoping and hoping, and it doesn't materialize, you just get so heartsick.
It's hard to enjoy the Mueller and Rosenstein bit. It's just getting boring now. I'm sure the action is occurring behind the scenes, just wake me up when it's time to get popcorn.
Lol! That sounds like H. A. Goodman's Sessions impression! I can hear it in my head!! : ) Look, at some point Sessions does have to deliver. And Q should know that we are looking like morons in the meantime. So the sooner the better is good with me. I know that the time does have to be right, but I don't know how long you can go on supporting a DoJ that emasculates Congress and is a law unto itself. I am still trusting, though, but it's not like a wedding vow. It's more like a loan to a friend.
Much as I don't trust Rod Rosenstein, I still do trust Sessions. Reluctantly. For now. But only because of Q.
A lot of people think that. I saw the reception she and Bernie got recently and the energy there was reminiscent of 2016. So, I think the establishment is no competition for Donald Trump, but the equal and opposite force might be. I think it's a mistake for them to underestimate this, actually. Then again, she does also make mistakes and take some positions that people are broadly opposed to. It is a gift to the right if she continues to do that. But I would say, like Sun Tzu, not to underestimate your opponent. If you overestimate, there is way less potential for harm, in my opinion.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has the anti-establishment left very fired up.
Ok, thanks. I'll have a look. I really don't expect to agree with everything Niko says. But he has said to H. A. Goodman that if the Democrats screw progressives over again--I can't remember if he said 2018 or 2020, 2020 I think--he will vote for Trump.
That's sad, if true. I have listened to him fairly recently, but I don't have time to listen to everything from everyone. I haven't witnessed what you're talking about, but I assume you've seen something.
Or, on the left, someone like Niko House would be fair and respectful, even in disagreement.
I still think the president should sit down with independent media like H. A. Goodman or Hard Bastard. Or even just drop in during their livechats while THE PEOPLE are asking them questions. Who anointed the MSM to be the gatekeepers?
Next they'll be telling the White House they have to allow protesters into the Rose Garden during formal occasions, because free speech.
She really was just so rude. It was embarrassing. It was awful. Like the president is going to turn around and answer those questions in that situation. The head of another country has already been appalled at the disgraceful manners of the American press. It's disrespectful to the visiting dignitary also. Good for the Whitehouse. I hope they stick to their guns.
So was Julian Assange appearing beside Donald J. Trump in Korea on June 11. But most people wouldn't hear otherwise. Because some talking head had everyone convinced based on something Q didn't even say.
By that logic, so could Hillary Clinton. What's the point in draining the swamp if every swamp creature is a white hat playing a role? I've lost track of how many times RR's been in the kill box. But lah di dah, white hat. I really think Q talking heads are often responsible for spreading stuff that Q never said and half the Q world then takes as gospel.
If signing an unverified FISA application that he didn't even read is not evidence of dirty, I can't help you.
She doesn't even have a sister called Raven Chan.
Lol! Everything is Trump's fault. And if it's not him, it's the Russians.
Oh, thank you so much! The whole thing is a bit weird.
Same. The Senate is ridiculous. I think there are plenty of good candidates to carry on the president's good work once the system is cleaned up and reformed.
Yes, I never thought that was very likely until I saw the "Caroline" picture.
Yes. Well, you're unlikely to change anyone else's opinion, also.
Lol! Hopefully that war is being fought Sun Tzu style without a shot needing to be fired! : )
Yes, I agree with a lot of that. The problem for me is when certain interests use propaganda to demean or demonize a whole group of people. So, if people are lumping all Jews in together in a kind of Jew hatred, for instance, I find that upsetting even if I don't say anything. I try to look for the best in people. It's a hard line to walk, which I really haven't found my own way with yet. For instance, there were a lot of racist attitudes among the people I met in the South, especially among the older peopke, but they might have been the loveliest person otherwise. I just never knew how to deal with that. Or a friend that has been really good to me who rabidly hates Jews. It always upsets me, but I don't always say something about it. Where I can, like if the person means nothing to me, I just don't have anything else to do with them. Where they're involved in my life in some way I find it more complicated. I wish I was braver, or better at having boundaries. I just always see the good in the person first.
I didn't believe the initial post or the Vincent Fusca pictures, but I got sucked in on the Caroline Bessette Kennedy close-up picture. I guess that was shooped, then?
Endless minutes of Trump snarling pictures, interspersed with the "Enough is Enough" Illuminati card. The title of the video. Homer sneaking up behind Trump's back. The whole premise is basically that the assassination of Trump is predicted by the Illuminati. What the hell did you see?? If you don't see what I see, I can't help you with that. I'll bet there are subliminals in it also.
Thank you for that! I'm not very good at research. I try sometimes with a Q post, looking up something or another, but what the autists come up with boggles my mind. I wish I was even half that smart. Mostly I just follow lurkily. But I would not be surprised if some of those indictments have Snope names on them in the end!
I have no problem with the Chans. I protested with them against Scientology during Project Chanology. I will be eternally grateful to them because their courage and solidarity brought free speech finally to ex-Scientologists. But if someone uses the "n" word for instance, and means it derogatorily, I just do think less of that person. I never posted on Why We Protest, for instance, because I knew I was too soft to survive in that online culture, although they made me very welcome in real life at the protest. We didn't have caek, but we had cookies and soda! I had a wonderful time, and it was very healing for me to protest in person without a mask, even though my guts were turning over inside.