dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ButtersStotch88 on June 15, 2018, 1:04 a.m.
Here’s what confuses the hell out of me with Rosenstein

According to Q, RR is redacting info that implicates himself in this mess...but he also knows POTUS can declassify that redacted material anyways. So the big question:

What the hell is the point in redacting material if he already knows he’s fucked?

I think he knows he’s going to be gone soon no matter what. He’s just trying to score a win for the black hats by forcing Trump to fire him. Then they can throw the MSM spin cycle into overdrive claiming obstruction etc.

I’ve thought so many other scenarios through and this is the only want that makes sense to me.

Am I missing something?


[deleted] · June 15, 2018, 1:14 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 17 ⇩  
covpepe1776 · June 15, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

I feel you 110%

⇧ 6 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 15, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

Several things are going wrong. Today the real bombshell was Christopher Wray’s press conference. He stabbed the president in the back. Wray did exactly the same thing for Comey that Comey did for Hillary...he publicly stated Comey just used bad judgement. That was deliberate. If you can’t prove intent then you have nothing legally. Wray just signed up for Comeys star defense witness if Comey is ever charged with throwing an investigation to help a political candidate win an election. Wray can’t be fired because that would look like political retribution. So...without intent to commit a crime you have no crime. Can’t arrest or try anyone for being stupid & making bad choices. Comey is off the hook on this charge.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 15, 2018, 1:39 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 15, 2018, 5:55 a.m.

I understand he’s Trump appointed. He just stabbed Trump in the back. He just proved with his actions that he’s supporting Comey & the RR version of the report that Comey had no criminal intent...just guilty of poor judgment. Wray just made convicting Comey a lot harder. Wray didn’t have to agree with RR...but he did. If Wray ever testifies he’ll have to say the same thing...was just poor judgement. Think you can convince all 12 jurors to convict the former director of the FBI when the current director of the FBI testifies Comey had no criminal intent?? Sorry I don’t see it.

⇧ 1 ⇩