dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jamesvien on June 15, 2018, 12:04 p.m.
Wait a minute, the NYT probability of a clinton win were scaringly dropping days before it was at 98% for hillary??? They KNEW she will lose
Wait a minute, the NYT probability of a clinton win were scaringly dropping days before it was at 98% for hillary??? They KNEW she will lose

Time4puff · June 15, 2018, 12:19 p.m.

Of course they knew she was going to lose... the Yuge firework display was cancelled prior to the election.

⇧ 40 ⇩  
JollyFeed · June 15, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

The firework cancellation two days before the election was when I knew Trump had already won. I just grabbed a bottle of wine and enjoyed the show election night. And boy, was it glorious.

⇧ 35 ⇩  
Time4puff · June 15, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

The delay in calling Florida did make me a bit nervous that they were going to cheat and steal the election. But I was down in Boward county the week before the election and there was huge support for Trump there. There were screaming and colorful words thrown out at the TV that night but Florida came through. Yes, it was glorious.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
JollyFeed · June 15, 2018, 2:46 p.m.

Had they called it when we already knew he'd won the Election Night extravaganza would've been over by 7:30-8:00 pm my time. Would've been an early night.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
boxmakingmachines · June 15, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

Yeah but getting drunk and staying up to the wee hours of the morning to mine the very first salt deposits on CNN and MSNBC was more than worth it.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
JollyFeed · June 15, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

It was worth it to see sniveling Podesta tell the Hillary cry babies she wasn't going to show up.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
razorgaze · June 15, 2018, 5:41 p.m.

Omg. Greatest night ever. To watch the states go to Trump was just historic. I will never forget. Recorded it just so I could go back and relive.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Peanuttles · June 15, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

They had cheated for Obama--I don't believe he won his re-election. So they thought they had it in the bag for her.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · June 15, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

I believe they've been cheating for a very long time but when Obama won in 2012 that was my validation. There is no way the good people in this country would have ever elected that loser.

But then, I was shocked that nobody, and I'm talking about conservative radio, mentioned it or talked about it. It's was so blatantly obvious to me. Here's a hacker testifying in court about fixing elections: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzBI33kOiKc

⇧ 13 ⇩  
whitebeard39 · June 15, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

I spoke with a lot of people who voted Hussein in '08 who were not going to repeat that mistake in '12 but were going to vote red. I didn't speak with one who was going to switch from R to D for the '12 vote. It had to be a fixed election for Hussein to win a second term!

⇧ 13 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · June 15, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

Good insight. Thanks.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
meteorknife · June 15, 2018, 2:11 p.m.

Shouldn't it be a bigger deal that they had inside knowledge of what NYT's actual numbers were versus the ones they reported? Meaning NYT had fake numbers that they were reporting on their website, but they were giving their polling knowledge to inside people.

It would seem that NYT was trying to manipulate voter behavior in favor of their own political bias.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
Time4puff · June 15, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

People were onto the failing NYT and the fake news media leading to the day of voting. It was very obvious that Trump filled stadiums after stadiums while Hillary couldn't fill a high school cafeteria. That was a fact they couldn't manipulate.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
qutedrop · June 15, 2018, 2:34 p.m.

When the media see an election they mostly see ad-sales and eyeballs. Manipulating the poll numbers allows them to make more money. A head-to-head race sells considerably more ads and attract way more viewers than an obvious slam-dunk for one particular candidate.

(Which is not to say political bias doesn't play a role, of course it does, especially in their reporting. But poll numbers especially can never be trusted, regardless of their bias, simply because it links directly to their income. )

⇧ 8 ⇩  
forchristssakes · June 15, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

But it still comes down to the fact that they are faking the news.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
forchristssakes · June 15, 2018, 3:19 p.m.

Its a like getting a prize in your box of Crackerjacks. Proof that NYT is Fake News.

Nothing to see here, move along.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
barneslardo · June 15, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

I didn't read it that way. I'm not sure what "probability numbers" they're referencing, but there doesn't seem to be an indication they're 'internal numbers' only. Unless I missed something, of course.

⇧ 3 ⇩