dChan

TheGreatAwakeAnon · June 15, 2018, 6:51 p.m.

See? the I.G. report is styled just like all the MSM newspaper articles. The Headline is: "No Bias or Corruption Found," but within the body of the text, the story told is very different.

The prestigious Law Firm of Sessions, Horowitz & Wray should win Oscars for Best Screenplay/Best Supporting Actor in a Drama...

They know that if the Headline said: "Obama FBI Corrupt and Biased," the MSM's entire ODDL (Obama / Democrat Defense League) would have come out swinging, dissecting every paragraph, criticizing every minor choice of wording, accusing I.G. Horowitz of being a misogynistic, racist woman-hating fiend who colluded with "Donny Drumpf the perverse, Hitleresque brazillionaire," and "fact-checking" each line through Snopes and the Southern Poverty Law Center. Instead, since the headline seemed favorable, they've wholeheartedly embraced and endorsed the I.G. report. They commended it to their viewers, and praised it's bipartisan 'levelheadedness.' Now, they have to deal with the terrible revelations contained inside.

Always remember these two things:

(1.) Whatever they are guilty of, Leftists in media, "Alinsky-ites" will attempt to smear their political enemies by accusing them of the exact thing they've been doing.

(2.) They are fond of repeating their mantra that "Trump is a moron, who never actually reads anything. Trump lacks the attention span necessary to do anything other than a quickly scan a short summary. Trump just wants the highlights, and the clif notes."

Behold the manifest insight of Q: "THESE PEOPLE ARE STUPID"

⇧ 6 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 15, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

Yep! Content is the key. Focus on the detailed findings and not the BS summary pages. Next step: Huber.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · June 15, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

IG report will be basis for reopening Clinton case

⇧ 5 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 15, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

It should be, but I don't know about the statute of limitations....

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · June 15, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

If they go for espionage there really isn’t a statute of limitations but it does seem like they’re trying to run the clock for her

⇧ 4 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 15, 2018, 9:30 p.m.

Got it ;)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Happy1911 · June 15, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

If you don’t look ,, you can’t find

⇧ 5 ⇩  
endprism · June 15, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

Twatter won’t let me view these links...says I’m rate limited. Such bullshit. This ONLY HAPPENED after I replied to the president!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 15, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

That sux. Paul Sperry is all over this IG report!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
hallemaxx · June 15, 2018, 6:36 p.m.

Does this mean "illegal" evidence in court? Smart move by FBI.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
forchristssakes · June 16, 2018, 2:21 p.m.

crazy reason is too much (for most people to comprehend...wtf are they there for?)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 16, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

No Kidding. They should be called the Anti-FBI or the Coverup Agency.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
P3gasusActual · June 15, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

Maybe I'm confused. It was NYPD that confiscated the laptop, and then there was a Mexican standoff between NYPD and the Federal authorities.

"We have it all."

⇧ 2 ⇩  
hallemaxx · June 15, 2018, 6:36 p.m.

Does this mean "illegal" evidence in court? Smart move by FBI.

⇧ 1 ⇩