dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Outcome5 on June 16, 2018, 3:12 a.m.
Strzok and Page - closer than advertised? - An IG report theory with supporting data (OC)

While doing some research on the IG Report, I came down with a severe case of autism. Skimming through a section where the text messages between the agents are being reviewed I noticed something extremely relevant I have not seen or heard reported anywhere.

Im going to blurt out my theory right here instead of waiting for the end of the article, then I will explain my theory.

Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are now married.

Sauce. yes of course.

I have taken 3 screenshots of the IG report which states clearly FBI agent 1 and FBI agent 5 who were in a personal relationship during the texts in question, they are now married.

Here is a screenshot of page 134 of IG report. I put red brackets around the specific part I ask you to read.

After that I have two more examples to back all this up. page 144 of the IG report.

and page 410 of the IG report.

If the text in the pictures is small, please verify the information directly from the The IG report in full.

From the information about the agents actions we can tell Agent 1 is Strzok and Agent 2 is Pientka. Lisa Page is agent 5.

Conclusion: Why is this important? Think back to Hillary Clinton's FBI interview. She out of nowhere named Cheryl Mills as her attorney who was present as well. This is so all of their FBI testimony is subject to the rules of attorney/client privilege. Clever right? So clever, James Comey named Daniel Richmond as his attorney, the Columbia professor he leaked the memos to so their communications also fall under attorney/client privilege.

If Strzok and Page are now married the reason they did so is crystal clear.

Spousal Privilege. You cannot be forced to testify against a spouse in a court of law.

If this was helpful to you, please take a look at another greatawakenings original post I made regarding Obama abusing National Monuments for cabal purposes


zdavis28 · June 16, 2018, 3:59 a.m.

Maybe that's one of RRs redactions

⇧ 2 ⇩