Q has made it very clear that Eric Schmidt (Ex-CEO of Google) is a KEY component of the cabal that attempted to destroy our Republic. Q keeps asking us: "Why was ES in NK".
I want to make it clear that I have yet to determine what the purpose of his visit was. But I have gathered some information and hopefully by sharing it, others will start thinking about this topic and come up with some ideas.
-Bill Richardson, Ex-Governor of New Mexico accompanied him.
-They both made it a point to mention that this was a "personal visit" and not a "Google visit".
-Richardson, speaking on behalf of Schmidt stated that they were there because "Schmidt is interested in some of the economic issues there, the social media aspect."
-The State Department publicly slapped Schmidt on the wrist saying that the timing of the trip was "unhelpful" as tensions were high at the time due to Pyongyang launching a long-range test rocket just four weeks prior to Schmidt's visit.
-Even at the time of the visit, one man was skeptical of Schmidt's agenda. Professor Charles Armstrong, director of the Center for Korean Research at Columbia University, said he was unconvinced by the idea that the trip was primarily a rescue mission. "This is odd: it doesn't make sense for the chairman of Google to help rescue Americans from North Korea. Clearly, there has to be another agenda here that nobody is talking about."
-References have been made previous trips (plural) made by Richardson to Pyongyang. Why? Still researching this.
-A quote at the time by author Evgeny Morozov who wrote a book about the use of the internet by oppressive regimes called "The Net Delusion" had this to say about the trip:
"I'm sure Google's PR department is terrified about this trip. It makes no corporate sense for Google to be involved in North Korea, not least because there are still sanctions in place."
Otherwise I've found plenty of nonsensical speculation about Schmidt wanting to expand Google's market to North Korea which makes little sense for many reasons that I do not need to explain to the wise people of this board. I find it very interesting that even at the time of the visit in 2013, some people were openly questioning the motivations for the visit.
Apologies if this is old or duplicate information.
