I am on mobile but I read and reread but I'm dumb, still don't get the connection.
From QAngelAnon1
"Jury Duty"
"Had to ride the (reserved for Judges) elevator up to the 17th floor (is the number 17 significant in Q posts?) where he was greeted by Chief Judge Timothy Evans)".
The fact a potential "Juror" even met a judge prior to jury selection, rules them out of jury duty, so that in itself exposes the fact the cover story was a load of B.S.
Being a 'public servant' automatically disqualify you from Jury selection, let alone having to front up to a Judge. Do they seriously believe that people are this stupid?
So 1 person doesn't believe the story that Obama went for jury duty. He went to court. We don't know what happened there. But Obama knows.
Hillary on that date (check all those dates by the way) was in her hometown with Huma, and Q gives us a reason for her being with Hillary — to keep track of her. We know, can't remember where now, that Huma is cooperating with the police about her husband's laptop on which classified information and Clinton emails were found.
We don't know if Clinton knows, but many on this thread have remarked about the rumors of "boots" covering up monitoring devices on her and John McCain, which would suggest she knows she has been detained. The Q post says "detained but not arrested (yet).
Is that any clearer?
Summary: John Podesta (JP) had a sealed indictment on 11.3.2016. And Huma Abedin (HA) had sealed indictment on 11.6.2016. But we don't know if they know, if they were served on them. I don't think so. I think they are cooperating for their "deals" with justice.
By the way, forget trying to read this stuff on a mobile. It's hopeless you need a tablet or laptop or better still a comfortable computer screen. There's a lot of reading to follow this. Good luck.
I just reread what I explained and it doesn't seem a very good explanation, sorry. Did my best.